Wednesday, September 08, 2021

REFORM JUSTICE: Scottish Government announce host of justice sector reforms - including register of judges’ interests, reform to regulation of lawyers & legal profession, Police complaints transparency & consultation on not-proven trial verdict

Justice reforms announced by Scottish Govt. PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS and key reforms to Scotland’s justice sector have been announced in the Scottish Government Work Programme 2021-2022 - including a register requiring all Scottish judges to declare their interests, and long awaited reforms to how Scotland’s lawyers investigate themselves.

In relation to regulation of the legal profession - the Scottish Govenrment Work Programme document states: “..we will also launch a public consultation on reform of legal services regulation, expected later in 2021, to consider what changes may be required to the statutory framework to protect consumer interests and promote a flourishing legal sector.”

And, on the subject of transparency and accountability in Scotland’s courts – the Ten year investigation of Scotland’s judiciary by the media and a petition to require judges to register and publish all their interests - backed by Scottish Parliament’s Public Petitions Committee – has contributed to action in the form of a committment to create the judicial interests register for all members of Scotland’s judiciary.

The Work Programme document states “To safeguard the independence and reputation of the judiciary, we will begin work on establishing a register of interests of its members to increase public confidence and improve transparency.”

Petition PE1458 was originally lodged at the Scottish Parliament in 2012. The Petition calls for the creation of a publicly available register of judicial interests – containing information on all judges’ backgrounds, figures relating to personal wealth, undeclared earnings, business & family connections inside & outside of the legal profession, membership of organisations, property and land, offshore investments, hospitality, details on recusals and other information routinely lodged in registers of interest across all walks of public life in the UK and around the world.

An earlier report on Petition PE 1458 and the committment to create a register of judges’ interests can be found here: JUDICIAL REGISTER: Scottish Government confirm Register of Judges’ Interests will be created - after Holyrood TEN YEAR probe of judicial interests & recusals survives lobbying by legal vested interests to close public interest transparency petition

The package of measures also include body worn cameras and reforms to complaints handling for Police Scotland, legislation to pardon Miners from convictions & unfair treatment suffered as a result of their participation in the 1980’s strikes, increased access to justice for court users & a re-visit of earlier proposals to reform the law of corroboration – where evidence must be verified from two independent sources.

The proposals can be found in the Scottish Government’s 2021-2022 work programme, available here: Scottish Government Work Programme 2021-2022

The full text of the Scottish Government’s Reforming the Justice System to Make Scotland Fairer, Safer & More Equal:

“We are proud of Scotland’s justice system and our distinctive Scots law. We will build on their foundations to bring in targeted reforms aimed at making Scottish justice still stronger and better.

During this year, we will launch a public consultation on the three verdict system and whether the not‑proven verdict should be abolished.

We will also consider reform of the corroboration rule, engaging with justice partners, opposition parties and people with direct experience of the criminal justice system to develop a shared understanding of the evolving legal position, and the implications and potential unintended consequences of corroboration reform, including in relation to sexual crimes.

The Scottish Government’s law officers, amongst other roles, act as the head of the independent prosecution service and as members of the Scottish Government. We will consult on whether the prosecution and government functions of the law officers should be separated.

We have already begun to address the backlog of court cases that accumulated during the pandemic, providing £50 million this year to help drive forward recovery.

We will review how offending is dealt with by the summary justice process, to make access to justice as efficient and effective as possible.

We will engage with both legal professionals and victim support organisations to review the Legal Aid system, and will introduce a Legal Aid Reform Bill in this Parliament, ensuring that the system is flexible, easy to access and meets the needs of those who use it.

And we will also launch a public consultation on reform of legal services regulation, expected later in 2021, to consider what changes may be required to the statutory framework to protect consumer interests and promote a flourishing legal sector.

Access to the courts is an important part of upholding individual rights and the rule of law; but there are times when other non‑litigious means of resolving disputes are preferable, notably in non‑criminal proceedings.

The Scottish Government will work with stakeholders to expand the availability of mediation and arbitration services within the civil justice system. The Scottish Government is working with stakeholders, and will consult on future changes as appropriate, to give people access to flexible, affordable and less stressful means of settling disputes, benefiting them and saving time in courts.

To safeguard the independence and reputation of the judiciary, we will begin work on establishing a register of interests of its members to increase public confidence and improve transparency.

Scotland’s police officers work hard every day to keep their communities safe, and have shown a strong, rights‑based approach to compliance during the pandemic. We will work to build on that model of policing by consent. To better understand and service the needs of our communities, we will support Police Scotland and wider partners to improve the diversity of their workforce and to enhance the quality of data across the justice system.

We will support Police Scotland and wider partners to build on improvement work in response to Dame Elish Angiolini’s review. We intend to accept and implement the majority of Dame Elish’s findings following consultation in 2022. This will include bringing forward a Bill and Regulations to promote fairness and transparency and strengthen public confidence in our Police.

We want Scotland’s police force to benefit from and take advantage of new technologies, such as body‑worn video, but to do so in a controlled way that commands public confidence. The Independent Advisory Group on Emerging Technologies will report to Ministers in 2022, recommending changes that should be made to existing legislative frameworks and policing practices: we will respond to its findings and act to ensure there is robust scrutiny and oversight where new technology is adopted.

We will also address the disproportionate consequences and stigma suffered by many miners as a result of their participation in the 1984‑85 strike. We will bring forward a Miners’ Strike Pardon Bill, and implement the pardon as soon as practicable should it become law – restoring the good name of the miners, and bringing comfort to their friends and families, and to former mining communities.

We will also support and resource the Sheku Bayoh Public Inquiry in its thorough scrutiny of the circumstances of his tragic death.”

With regard to the consultation later this year on how to reform regulation of legal services & solicitors – readers with experience of how complaints are handled by the Scottish Legal Complaints Commission, Law Society of Scotland, and Faculty of Advocates – should ensure their views are made known to the consultation when it is launched by the Scottish Government.

Anyone with cases which involve questions relating to Scotland’s judiciary, the conduct of judges in court, conflicts of interest & related issues should continue to email material to this blog for further study and reporting as appropriate.

12 comments:

Anonymous said...

Bring back Moi Ali, whatever it costs. I don't trust the politicians, and she would speak truth to power.

Anonymous said...

I am reading your wonderful blog for the first time today.
Really amazing piece of work and all your achievements!
More power to people such as you Mr Peter Cherbi!

Anonymous said...

For your information when miners were convicted of crimes in the 80s there were lots of nasty comments from judges in courts on obeying the law and striking

Anonymous said...

I remember a BBC Scotland journalist who said in an email chain your petition will be "booted out" in early 2013.
Here we are in 2021 with a Scottish Gov announcement and acceptance your petition was the correct way to go on the judicial register added to all your work on regulation of solicitors.
Well done PC.

Anonymous said...

Very good Peter and nice to see goverment accept your argument of judicial transparency for judges interests

Anonymous said...

Peter I have commented on your blog and told people for twenty years. Man you cheese those lawyers off and that is brilliant. You like many others including myself know what they really are a faction of mendacious crooks masquarading as respectibility. Thanks to you and the rest of the DOI team.

Anonymous said...

The register for judges will only work if Cherbi is somehow dragged kicking and screaming to make sure all Scottish judges do as they are told and register interests otherwise nothing will happen.You pursued this for how many years? so you have to be part of what you helped bring about!Am I right?I am!

Anonymous said...

Peter Cherbi and Moi Ali the two people in Scotland made Scottish judges more accountable!
Keep going Peter make the whole legal profession accountable as you have always worked for those who never obtain justice!

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/judges-must-register-financial-interests-to-ensure-transparency-bfzpm789m

Judges must register financial interests to ensure transparency

Kieran Andrews, Scottish Political Editor

Wednesday June 16 2021 The Times

Judges will be forced to register their financial interests after SNP ministers confirmed they would push ahead with the transparency scheme.

At present all judiciary in UK jurisdictions have a duty to declare any relevant interest in cases before them such as shareholdings, directorships and memberships but they are not required to register any before a case arises, unlike in some other countries.

This means the rules are different for judges and sheriffs when compared with politicians and public board members, who have to publish details of any directorships or shares they hold.

Senior legal figures have voiced opposition to the plans but Keith Brown, the justice Secretary, has confirmed the “openness scheme” will go ahead.

“It was a manifesto commitment to create a register of interests for members of the judiciary to improve transparency and trust in the justice system,” he told the Daily Record.

“Now the new government is in place, we will start looking at ways this register can be introduced.”

Judges in Scotland have argued that such scrutiny could put their personal and financial security at risk from criminals, expose them to scrutiny by “aggressive media” and deter lawyers from seeking a career in the judiciary.

Lord Carloway, the lord president, who is the most senior member of the Scottish judiciary, previously claimed the policy would be “detrimental”. He also declined to appear before Holyrood’s justice committee when it investigated the idea in 2019 as he felt that it would simply “go over old ground that has already been covered extensively”.

In a letter to the committee, he again raised the prospect of a register deterring prospective judges. MSPs went on to back the principle of a register.

This argument has previously been dismissed by Moi Ali, a former board member of the Scottish Police Authority and now the independent assessor of complaints for the Crown Prosecution Service in England, as “the baseless claims of a backward judiciary seeking to defend an opaque system that is open to nepotism and bias”.

The transparency row was sparked nearly ten years ago by Peter Cherbi, the campaigner and legal blogger, who submitted a petition to Holyrood calling for a register to be introduced.

“Rules of declarations of interest for the judiciary should at least equal those applied to elected politicians,” he said.

In Norway, judges must complete a register of interests listing honorary posts, investments, memberships of political parties, companies, religious communities and charities among others.

A Judicial Communications spokesman said: “Judges are obliged to declare an interest where there is any real or perceived conflict in a court case before them. If there is a conflict, they will step down from the case (called a recusal) and it will be heard by a different judge.

“The lord president’s position was made clear in his evidence to the Public Petitions Committee that an additional, mandatory register of interests is not necessary or beneficial.”

Anonymous said...

PC saw this through to the end and I sense from his writing he will keep an eye on what happens next.
Not many if any manage such a feat against the all powerful judiciary as your friend MSP Angus MacDonald said in the Scottish Parliament.
I honestly do not know of anyone else who could pull this off and keep an investigation of judges going for ten years.
Well done Peter.

Anonymous said...

“The lord president’s position was made clear in his evidence to the Public Petitions Committee that an additional, mandatory register of interests is not necessary or beneficial.”

The judges are so afraid of revealing their interests they do not deserve to be judges.Come to think of it Peter why has it taken so long for people to understand and grasp the idea judges should declare their interests like everyone else?This is one of those issues when you sit down and think about it we should have been demanding judges are forced to comply with the same laws affecting politicians and their interests.Just goes to show how public are told what not to ask or think and no discussion allowed on certain subjects such as the judiciary.

Keep up the good work Peter!

Anonymous said...

By not covering your petition the BBC actively assisted judges campaigning against the register.Of course when anyone sits down and takes time to look at the BBC instead of take everything they say as fact.BBC is an organisation with many problems a lot of dishonesty appeasement of aggressive judges vested interests and a very belligerent attitude towards anyone let down by courts or judges or lawyers.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...

By not covering your petition the BBC actively assisted judges campaigning against the register.Of course when anyone sits down and takes time to look at the BBC instead of take everything they say as fact.BBC is an organisation with many problems a lot of dishonesty appeasement of aggressive judges vested interests and a very belligerent attitude towards anyone let down by courts or judges or lawyers.

25 September 2021 at 12:16

judge and lawyer bias from BBC is nothing new.Their so-called 'consumer' programmes ignore thousands of complaints every year against lawyers and courts.
I wrote to Watchdog years ago about how the Law Society of Scotland ruined a complaint I made against my solicitor.The BBC told me it was illegal for them to broadcast any information about my complaint and referred me back to the Law Society of Scotland!
BBC programmes pretend to campaign on issues but they do not really protect consumers all they do is ask you for all your information about your complaint then send everything back to the Law Society or the lawyer to get you into trouble.
BBC=Fake News and Fake consumer help.BBC give themselves medals for doing bugger all and fooling viewers into believing they are helping when they never did anything!