In the bag ? ‘Sniffer dogs may have a better chance of catching John O’Donnell than Law Society’s Elaine Motion’. A ROGUE SOLICITOR remains at large in Scotland today after Law Society Chiefs claim they could not find him to serve a court order banning him from working as a solicitor. The lawyer in question, John G O’Donnell, who was suspended, then had his practising certificate removed after the media focussed on his trail of destruction which includes many ruined clients, is, according to the Law Society of Scotland “nowhere to be seen”, thus preventing the incompetent regulator from serving a court order obtain earlier in October at Scotland’s Court of Session.
The recent case in Scotland’s Court of Session, where the Law Society sought an Interim Interdict preventing O’Donnell posing as a solicitor, only came about after further investigations by the Sunday Mail newspaper, who revealed that O’Donnell had been receiving clients desperately in need of legal assistance from ‘wannabe lawyers’ working for Hamilton Citizens Advice Bureau.
The Sunday Mail revealed that O’Donnell had targeted an elderly widow, Elizabeth Campbell, who produced evidence that one of Hamilton CAB’s In Court advisers had sent her to O’Donnell, sending a handwritten note he hoped the crooked lawyer would be able to scoop £3000 from his latest victim. Diary of Injustice reported on the case, here : Crooked lawyer impersonates DEAD COLLEAGUE to lure clients in fraud scam as Law Society of Scotland’s self regulation of solicitors fails yet again
QC Elaine Motion of Balfour & Manson, has represented the Law Society against John O’Donnell at hearings before the Scottish Solicitors Discipline Tribunal and now at the Court of Session, yet years have gone by, and the numbers of victims of O’Donnell increased markedly, without any substantive action on the part of regulators or Scotland’s Crown Office to go after O’Donnell to end his reign of terror over Scots who take him on, unknowingly. In an earlier attempt to get O’Donnell off the hook, and limit media coverage of the serial conman, legal representatives of O’Donnell tried to broker a deal at a Law Society Christmas party in 2009.
A ‘sanitised‘account’ of the meeting between Elaine Motion & Steven Gold, is reported in the Tribunal's hearing into one of the complaints against O’Donnell, which is published online here Council of the Law Society of Scotland v John G O'Donnell and reprinted below to give a flavour of the double dealing behind the closed doors world of self regulation of Scottish solicitors :
Law Society’s 2009 Christmas party was scene of deal to save O’Donnell from disciplinary moves. Page three of the Council of the Law Society of Scotland v John G O'Donnell states : “In December 2009, Elaine Motion and Steven Gold, Solicitor were both at a Law Society’s Christmas Drinks Party. They were involved in a conversation with regard to the health and welfare of the Respondent. Mr Gold made representations on behalf of the Respondent to Elaine Motion to the effect that it would be humane and advantageous to everyone involved if a way could be found to allow the Respondent to hand in his practising certificate without having to undergo the ordeal and expense of an appearance before the Tribunal. Elaine Motion was sympathetic to the representations but indicated that she would require to discuss matters with the Law Society of Scotland who would make the decision. There was no undertaking given at this meeting to Steven Gold that if the Scottish Solicitors’ Discipline Tribunal struck the Respondent’s name from the Roll of Solicitors in Scotland no further Complaints would be brought against the Respondent and no undertaking was given that if the Respondent accepted pleas of guilty to the outstanding Complaint, no further proceedings would be brought against him.”
Commenting on the latest development in the O’Donnell saga, a legal insider told Diary of Injustice this afternoon he felt the case was being handed very poorly by the Law Society, who could have gone after O’Donnell “years ago” to stop his trail of destroyed clients.
He compared the latest efforts made by the Law Society of Scotland to stop O’Donnell working as a solicitor, as “a joke”, going onto say “The Law Society clearly don't want to find him to quickly. Perhaps they might have a better chance if they call out some sniffer dogs.”
If you know where rogue solicitor John G O’Donnell is, tell us via scottishlawreporters@gmail.com and the information will be passed on to the appropriate channels.
The Sunday Mail has reported on the new developments :
BANNED LAWYER FACES NEW COURT DATE
A rogue lawyer is being hunted by watchdogs so they can tell him he's banned - again.
John O'Donnell, 62, has been accused of breaching a ban on working as a solicitor following a Sunday Mail probe.
The Law Society of Scotland's Elaine Motion is trying to take him to court but does not know where he is.
O'Donnell has been repeatedly rapped for professional misconduct and negligence.
The Law Society won an interim interdict at the Court of Session Edinburgh three years ago, banning him from posing as a solicitor. Six Months ago, we revealed that O'Donnell was allegedly using another lawyer's identity to beat the ban.
That prompted the Law Society to take action against him for flouting the interdict.
One source said : "The problem is that he's nowhere to be seen and does not appear keen to make himself available."
The Law Society said : "John O'Donnell does not hold a current practising certificate and therefore cannot practise as a solicitor in Scotland.
"The Law Society applied to the court to serve notice - by way of an advertisement in the press - of an alleged breach of an interim interdict."
"The Interim Interdict included an order preventing Mr O'Donnell from holding himself out as entitled by law to practise as a solicitor."
"The application to service a notice was granted by the court on October 16"
Slow motion Elaine - We expect nothing more!
ReplyDeleteThis is a farce,the Law Society can find him in fact he;s probably right on their doorstep!
ReplyDeleteIf the dogs get one whiff of Motion they will be off like a shot in the opposite direction.
ReplyDeleteI dont envy any idiot handing money over to a QC who is supposed to be chasing some bent lawyer since 2009 (presumably even longer)
ReplyDeleteOne would think this is an embarrassment to one's career surely?
Elaine Motion to star in remake of Police Academy?
ReplyDeleteExcuses excuses and by the sounds of the Christmas party they were all having fun over O'Donnell's victims.
ReplyDeleteJust a thought here but with Elaine Motion involved in this so long isn't it about time someone was on the case who will actually do something instead of "oh dear I cant find the bugger to serve the papers on" lark?
Poor state of affairs at the Law Society no wonder you all want rid of them.
This is a well practised fraud by the Law Society of Scotland's Agent Elaine Motion?
ReplyDeleteDid she spin on one heel and say, oh, I cannot see that loveable rogue big John O'Donnell......Oh we'll, at least nobody can say I did not try to see him?
I have a far better idea.......why do the police not intervene, instead of the Law Society of Scotland trying to keep their crooked lawyer out of the jail?
How can the Law Society of Scotland be allowed to defeat the ends of justice in this way to allow their crooked member to continue on his attacks against the unsuspecting Public?
This lot must be having a laugh surely?They claim they cant find him to serve a write?What an utter load of crap!
ReplyDeleteI heard that Elaine Motion has a history of 'helping' crooked Scottish lawyers evade justice and intervenes to 'clean-up' for the Law Society of Scotland so that the police are not involved all to protect crooked Scottish lawyers from jail?
ReplyDeleteThe Law Society of Scotland are taking the piss and are laughing at us?
ReplyDeleteElaine Motion agreed that it was advantageous and better for all and to save O'Donnell money to let him off Scot-Free?
What about O'Donnell's victims?
As usual the victims of this crooked lawyer are treated with utter contempt and before you know it O'Donnell pops up again, continuing to wreak havoc every where he goes?
I wonder who, acting for the Law Society, brokered the deal for O'Donnell to continue to work at another solicitor's office, so that he can continue to charge inflated fees to unsuspecting victims?
It's almost as if the Law Society and their Agents are running a book on how to be the most corrupt that they can possibly be?
Can anyone explain why the Law Society's slippery Agent is being allowed to act in place of the Police, especially as she had a hand in O!Donnell being a crook on the loose in the first place?
ReplyDeleteMakes you wonder just how hard Elaine Motion is prepared to look for someone she has already tried to give a soft sanction to?
When the poacher has run off with the farmer's chickens, you don't allow the person who cut the hole in the fence to search for the poacher to bring them to justice?
This is a very unconvincing failed public relations attempt to fool the all of the Public all of the time?
Why no police involvement?
ReplyDeleteWhy is this crime different?
How can the Law Society of Scotland be allowed to take the place of the police?
Just as with those who protect lawyers it is now easy to see now how Savile and the pedos manage to get away with their vile abuse when these sick so called 'regulators' step in to prevent any charges or bad publicity.
ReplyDeletePersonally I feel it is time for all victims to move against their abusers in whatever form the abuse takes and in all walks of life and end their reign of abuse NOW
Peter I am surprised!
ReplyDeleteI thought you'd be using a pack of Rotweilers to flush out O'Donnell, not a Spaniel!
Anyway good luck.Headline suggestion : Daft Law Society sits on it's f.a. moaning "ah dinnae ken" while law blogger hunts lawyers in need of jail time!
Your night desk friends in the south :)
A ROGUE SOLICITOR remains at large in Scotland today
ReplyDeleteAYE AND DONT FORGET THE OTHER 9,999 ROGUE SOLICITORS STILL AT LARGE!
I feel that it is about time the Police concentrated their gaze on Elaine Motion for her part in this crime?
ReplyDeleteWhat I cannot understand is how the Law Society of Scotland's lawyer (who is employed by them to minimise any potential claims against the Law Society of Scotland's Guarantee Fund) is allowed to replace the police, so they can try to keep this scandal in-house by locking the police out so that it blocks the police's ability to Report this crook to the Crown Office, which is all part of their agenda of defeating the ends of justice with impunity to ensure that they can unlawfully keep their lawyer out of jail?
ReplyDeleteThe Law Society have sent Elaine Motion into this scandal to pull the wool over the Public's eyes?
ReplyDeleteWhy would Elaine Motion serve an Interdict against O'Donnell to stop him from continuing to pass himself off as a lawyer?
This Interdict's purpose is to ask O'Donnell to stop continuing to pass himself off as a lawyer in the future, which is NOT the priority of the Public & his victims and only serves the interests of the Law Society of Scotland and O'Donnell himself?
We all know that O'Donnell has already broken the law and defrauded his clients therefore the Police should have an all ports bulletin posted to apprehend him as he is clearly attempting to flee justice?
It would not surprise me if the Law Society has paid for O'Donnell to leave the country for a few months in the hope that this scandal will be forgotten?
The Law Society said : "John O'Donnell does not hold a current practising certificate and therefore cannot practise as a solicitor in Scotland.
ReplyDelete"The Law Society applied to the court to serve notice - by way of an advertisement in the press - of an alleged breach of an interim interdict."
"The Interim Interdict included an order preventing Mr O'Donnell from holding himself out as entitled by law to practise as a solicitor."
"The application to service a notice was granted by the court on October 16"
Where is this advertisement?I haven't seen it.
Why should O'Donnell be afraid of this latest move because he does not hold a PC anyway?
Law Society are selling a lie I reckon
I thought that it was the Police who had the job of arresting and charging crooks?
ReplyDeleteHow can the Law Society keep the Police away from doing their job?
Is Elaine Motion a police officer as well as being the Law Society of Scotland's lawyer?
ReplyDeleteNO, I don't think so?
So, why the hell are the police allowing her to try and obfuscate their investigations into their crooked Scottish lawyer?
Could it be that the Crown Office have STOOD THE POLICE DOWN and told them NOT TO INVESTIGATE their colleague crooked Scottish lawyer so that they can ensure that he gets off Scot Free again?
I have heard that all of the notorious crime families and organisations are putting their people through to become lawyers because:
ReplyDelete(i) their Scottish lawyers are above the law
(ii) their Scottish lawyers will be able to extort and defraud the Public of cash knowing that the Law Society of Scotland will aid and abet them so that they can be kept out of jail and that they receive the softest sanction possible?
(iii) they will be able to double and triple bill their client victims with impunity?
(iv) they know that whenever they commit crimes that the police will be told NOT to investigate them and that the Law Society of Scotland's lawyer will ride to their rescue?
(v) the SLAB fund can be used as a tool for them to automatically augment their already inflated salary?
I was chatting to my colonic irrigationilist yesterday and she commented on the problems associated with slow motion?
ReplyDeleteShe felt that it was disgraceful for the Law Society of Scotland to put in their OWN lawyer (to protect the Law Society's criminal liability) in place of the police in an attempt to pervert the course of justice?
I wasn't sure if she was talking shit or not?
Answers please on a stamped addressed envelope to:
Poot Shits Away
PO Box NO 2
Drumsfeugh Gardens
Stench Passage
Staines
London
W33 0OT
Isnt it interesting the Law Society are taking legal action only because the paper has been chasing this story?
ReplyDeleteThis proves without a doubt if anyone wants some action about their bent lawyer there has to be some publicity or its a no hoper!
Who needs the police when we have Elaine Motion?
ReplyDeleteI've commented before about Elaine Motion,suffice to say I was the original complainer in a case she took before the SSDT and the Law Society completely cut me out of it,doctored the terms of my complaint and the solicitor was let off with a suspension.
ReplyDeleteI offered a statement it was refused and I was told nothing of what happened instead having to find out for myself.
A word of warning to anyone dealing with the Law Society and their so called "Fiscals" such as Elaine Motion you should always copy any paperwork you give them and every time you are forced to hand over original paperwork get them to sign a form saying you will get it back by a certain date because if you don't they lie and say they don't have it or they have lost it so cant return it to you.
Anyone talking to her or the Law Society should take full notes of any conversation and I mean FULL NOTES and hand it over to the press that way you stand a better chance of something happening in your case.
It's good to see you and the Sunday Mail keeping up with these horrible characters so keep up the good work all.
Anonymous said...
ReplyDeleteI've commented before about Elaine Motion,suffice to say I was the original complainer in a case she took before the SSDT and the Law Society completely cut me out of it,doctored the terms of my complaint and the solicitor was let off with a suspension.
I offered a statement it was refused and I was told nothing of what happened instead having to find out for myself.
A word of warning to anyone dealing with the Law Society and their so called "Fiscals" such as Elaine Motion you should always copy any paperwork you give them and every time you are forced to hand over original paperwork get them to sign a form saying you will get it back by a certain date because if you don't they lie and say they don't have it or they have lost it so cant return it to you.
Anyone talking to her or the Law Society should take full notes of any conversation and I mean FULL NOTES and hand it over to the press that way you stand a better chance of something happening in your case.
It's good to see you and the Sunday Mail keeping up with these horrible characters so keep up the good work all.
4 November 2012 20:31
_________________________________________
You too?
I know three others who were shafted by shifty Motion?
In my experience, if you feel you have to talk to any of these fiends then you are strongly advised to record every conversation digitally to protect yourself from their lies and double dealing?
I know of someone who's lawyer was being taken to the Law Society's SSDT, which they were a witness to their lawyers criminality?
When it became clear that there was serious corruption between the Law Society and their SSDT and they (as the Primary Witness) pointed this out to all the parties involved......they were told by the Fiscal and the Law Society's SSDT that THIS CASE WAS NOT OF THEIR CONCERN & THAT THEY WERE ONLY A MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC AND HAD NO INFLUENCE ON THEIR PROCESS OR CONDUCT !!!!!!!!?
Needless to say the crooked Scottish lawyer was let off Scot-Free, despite prime facie evidence of their criminality?
This Interdict or Breach of Interdict is a complete con of the Public and an insult to O'Donnell's victims's intelligence?
ReplyDeleteThe police should be allowed to do their job.....arrest this crook and recommend to the Crown Office that they throw the book at him?
To do otherwise is to wilfully defeat the ends of justice, which also should be prosecuted by the police then Crown Office?
I have it on good authority the only reason the Christmas party reference was included in the SSDT hearing was because they were too many witnesses of the kind likely to talk.
ReplyDeleteVery good Peter.
ReplyDeleteAnyone who has a complaint in with the Law Society or the SLCC should read this and realise the entire tribunal process of the SSDT is a charade.
Of course I know this to be the case anyway as I am a solicitor myself!
Keep up the good work!
Exciting stuff.
ReplyDeleteTell me,are these judges thick or what?
Dont they know about the hundreds of stories on this O'Donnell guy and all these cases against him?
Is it not about time one of m'luds told Motion to get off her slow motion and actually do something to help O'Donnell's victims?
This is more a case of who let the dogs in rather than who let the dogs out.
ReplyDeleteClearly the LSoS were only moved to act after the press coverage and this is the same Law Society who claim to protect clients just as much as their members.
Elaine Motion please note. Mr O'Donnell and the Law Society are the same. Only unsuspecting clients or gibbering fools think you lawyers are honest decent people. I would rather die before I would trust lawyer filth again. Human vermin they are.
ReplyDeleteA member of my family had her access to benefit stopped for five months to starve her into submission. Mr Cherbi and the DOI Team are spot on where you lot are concerned. I would jail everyone in the Law Society and weld the doors shut. And I would sleep well knowing the public were safer for it.
Mr O'Donnell is just a public version of a group who are all criminals. When clients look across any lawyers desk they are looking at an O'Donnell.
You are all dealing with people who want to ruin you and then they expect you to forgive them.
ReplyDeleteThey created a system to keep them clean when they are devious crooks.
The Courts and Motion will kiss his butt. They want to reward him for running people.
ReplyDeleteIf they meant business he would go to prison. If I impersonated a dead person for financial gain I would be in jail. Join the right club and breaking the law is legal. Motion is fooling no one.
They fail to serve court order banning him from targeting new victims.
ReplyDeleteWell their web site states http://www.lawscot.org.uk/forthepublic
'As well as representing its members, the Society promotes the interests of the public in relation to the solicitors' profession. This section contains information on some common legal issues, solicitor standards, consumer protections for the public and how to make a complaint about a solicitor'.
The bit about Solicitor Standards is bullshit too. They want to protect all their lawyers no matter what they do to you. This is why they designed the complaints system the way it is.
http://www.lawscot.org.uk/home#node-1064
ReplyDeleteThe web site of a Confederacy of liars.
Is it possible that the reason the Law Society of Scotland sent Elaine Motion in to try to stifle any police investigation is that they are worried about potential claims against their Guarantee Fund?
ReplyDeleteThe Guarantee Fund is a little known fund that is supposed to compensate client victims who have been preyed upon by crooked Scottish lawyers (but they don't like you to know about it)?
O'Donnell's mob stink. They are crooked control freaks. Stay away if possible people.
ReplyDeletePoor John eh Elaine. The guy should be in prison out of clients way.
ReplyDeleteIn one email, she Margaret Scanlan wrote: "I would prefer that we not give any recognition to Scotland Against Crooked Lawyers. "I do not see why we have to name them even if we are bound to engage with them. "Their website is offensive and so far as I am aware no reputable organisations has anything to do with them"
ReplyDelete===============================
Her idea of reputable organisations. The Law Society and SLCC. You cannot reason with a lawyer. They think campaigners should be silent about Scottish lawyers who ruined them. She wrote they were offensive. But she did not say they were liars because Margaret knows Scotland Against Crooked Lawyers and A Diary of Injustice are telling the truth.
I know a Hamilton lawyer who was derobed. 0h not for stealing from clients. He stole from his lawyer colleagues. But if he was doing what O'Donnell is doing he would have been protected. No Margaret you are immature and offensive. If l stole your property and the Police stood down you would be furious. But when lawyers steal from clients the Law Society & SLCC stand down.
Grow up Margaret, put yourself in the clients shoes. Campaigners are standing up against those who are meant to protect the public. They just want protection, just like you would if I stole your property.
Anonymous said...
ReplyDeleteVery good Peter.
Anyone who has a complaint in with the Law Society or the SLCC should read this and realise the entire tribunal process of the SSDT is a charade.
Of course I know this to be the case anyway as I am a solicitor myself!
Keep up the good work!
5 November 2012 15:55
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
At last an honest Scottish Lawyer.....
I thought that they had gone the same way as the Do do?
Why don't you speak out about the criminal acts perpetrated with impunity by Law Society of Scotland?
The SSDT are a bunch of crooks themselves and are more likened to a KANGAROO COURT and have ZERO credibility?
Anonymous said...
ReplyDeleteExciting stuff.
Tell me,are these judges thick or what?
Dont they know about the hundreds of stories on this O'Donnell guy and all these cases against him?
Is it not about time one of m'luds told Motion to get off her slow motion and actually do something to help O'Donnell's victims?
5 November 2012 20:35
////////////(/(/(/)/)/)/(/(/)/)/)//))/(///))/)/)/)/)/(//(/(/()/)/)/)/(/
Don't you know that Elaine Motion has been supplanted in there so as to do the exact opposite?
She is there as the Law Society of Scotland's personal lawyer and her job is to exact as much pain and humiliation to O'Donnell's victims?
Otherwise, she would have caught O'Donnell by now and got him sentenced to jail?
Her job is to prevent O'Donnell's victims claiming compensation through the Law Society's Guarantee Fund?
Anonymous said...
ReplyDeleteThis is more a case of who let the dogs in rather than who let the dogs out.
Clearly the LSoS were only moved to act after the press coverage and this is the same Law Society who claim to protect clients just as much as their members.
6 November 2012 14:33
llllllllyyyyyyyyeeeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrsssssssss
This is of course their well practiced lie to deceive the Scottish People who they hate with total contempt?
Anonymous said...
ReplyDeleteElaine Motion please note. Mr O'Donnell and the Law Society are the same. Only unsuspecting clients or gibbering fools think you lawyers are honest decent people. I would rather die before I would trust lawyer filth again. Human vermin they are.
A member of my family had her access to benefit stopped for five months to starve her into submission. Mr Cherbi and the DOI Team are spot on where you lot are concerned. I would jail everyone in the Law Society and weld the doors shut. And I would sleep well knowing the public were safer for it.
Mr O'Donnell is just a public version of a group who are all criminals. When clients look across any lawyers desk they are looking at an O'Donnell.
7 November 2012 13:20
________________________________________
Well said......
I'll hold the steel door steady for you while you weld it shut?
Anonymous said...
ReplyDeleteThey fail to serve court order banning him from targeting new victims.
Well their web site states http://www.lawscot.org.uk/forthepublic
'As well as representing its members, the Society promotes the interests of the public in relation to the solicitors' profession. This section contains information on some common legal issues, solicitor standards, consumer protections for the public and how to make a complaint about a solicitor'.
The bit about Solicitor Standards is bullshit too. They want to protect all their lawyers no matter what they do to you. This is why they designed the complaints system the way it is.
7 November 2012 16:24
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Hallelujah!!!!!!!!
Bingo!
Well Done.......
Yes, the Law Society of Scotland's standards are a complete LIE?
The Law Society of Scotland have been wilfully defeating the ends of justice to keep their members out of jail now for many years?
The Law Society of Scotland have been overtly disregarding the Solicitor (Scotland) Act 1980 for years and have increasingly become one of the worst criminal gangs Scotland has ever witnessed?
Some of the Law Society's Office Bearers should be spending many years in prison for acting above the law to damage and destroy good Scottish citizen's lives and the politician's stand guilty as charged for standing by watching this crime being committed without lifting a finger?
Bring back Guido Fawkes?
Anonymous said...
ReplyDeleteIn one email, she Margaret Scanlan wrote: "I would prefer that we not give any recognition to Scotland Against Crooked Lawyers. "I do not see why we have to name them even if we are bound to engage with them. "Their website is offensive and so far as I am aware no reputable organisations has anything to do with them"
===============================
Her idea of reputable organisations. The Law Society and SLCC. You cannot reason with a lawyer. They think campaigners should be silent about Scottish lawyers who ruined them. She wrote they were offensive. But she did not say they were liars because Margaret knows Scotland Against Crooked Lawyers and A Diary of Injustice are telling the truth.
I know a Hamilton lawyer who was derobed. 0h not for stealing from clients. He stole from his lawyer colleagues. But if he was doing what O'Donnell is doing he would have been protected. No Margaret you are immature and offensive. If l stole your property and the Police stood down you would be furious. But when lawyers steal from clients the Law Society & SLCC stand down.
Grow up Margaret, put yourself in the clients shoes. Campaigners are standing up against those who are meant to protect the public. They just want protection, just like you would if I stole your property.
8 November 2012 12:35
:::;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;
EXACTLY WHEN DID HUMANITY MAKE THE TRUTH OFFENSIVE.
One day all of this bad Karma will rebound tenfold on these crooked Scottish lawyers?
Remember, not to fall down any holes and expect to be pulled out?
What is the difference between the Sarlet Pimpernel & O'Donnell?
ReplyDeleteThey eventually caught the Sarlet Pimpernel?
I was just wondering, is the reason the Law Society cannot find O'Donnell that he is really a shape-shifting changeling from the planet Thar?
ReplyDeleteDifference between Osama Bin Laden and O'Donnell?
ReplyDeleteIt took quite a considerable time but at least they got him in the end?
I went round to O'Donnell's house the other night and peered through his living room window.......?
ReplyDeleteHad his feet up and was watching I'm a celebrity get me out of here (in the jungle) eating cake and slurping champagne?
Wasn't someone supposed to be looking for him...........?
Thank you the team at DOI, you are the upholders of truth for every citizen in Scotland.
ReplyDeleteJust imagine the terrible state we would be in if it was not for your incredible diligence and wisdom.
Once again, thank you for all your selfless work on behalf of the Scottish Public.
Peace out.
I wonder where the Law Society of Scotland's safe house is that is keeping O'Donnell safe from Justice?
ReplyDeleteIs Elaine Motion charging by the hour to find the fugitive O'Donnell?
ReplyDeleteTwo words.
ReplyDeleteFantastic Journalism.
I have a solution for finding O'Donnell?
ReplyDeleteTo get rid of Motion and allow the police to do their job?
The police would put out an arrest warrant on O'Donnell so that he could be brought to justice, charged and sentenced to jail, under the rule of law?
Simples!