Accountant in Bankruptcy seized disability benefits to pay law firm’s disputed fees MEDIA REPORTING of a case in which a sequestrated client’s Disability Benefits payments were illegally seized for nearly FOUR MONTHS by the Accountant in Bankruptcy (AIB) over a wrangle involving debts which a Perth based law firm, Kippen Campbell claim are owed to them over a collapsed court case, appears to have helped the client, Mr William Gordon (also of Perth) finally gain access to money desperately needed for living expenses.
Mr Gordon apparently discovered his accounts had been unfrozen last weekend, but no one from the AIB has contacted him over the matter or offered explanations as to why they had seized his benefits payments.
Diary of Injustice reported last week that Mr Gordon was apparently sequestrated by his former law firm after a series of bitter, ‘one sided’ court actions held in Perth Sheriff Court, where agents acting for Kippen Campbell demanded Mr Gordon be sequestrated to pay fees they claimed were due to them for legal services provided for a medical damages claim being heard in the Court of Session.
Even though it transpired Mr Gordon was too ill to attend court for any of the hearings, and his doctor had written to the court informing them of his patient’s medical circumstances, it appears Sheriffs at Perth Sheriff Court ignored the doctor’s medial opinions and sided with the local law firm who were demanding fees for representing Mr Gordon in the now collapsed medical damages claim. More on the story can be found here : Personal injury client dropped by Perth based solicitors Kippen Campbell ‘being hounded’ by court attempts to recover disputed fees
Earlier last week, the Herald newspaper & Scottish Law Reporter reported that attempts had been made to seize Mr Gordon’s home by Glasgow based accountants Wylie & Bisset who are acting on behalf of the Accountant in Bankruptcy. Wylie & Bisset were apparently convinced Mr Gordon owned his property. Apparently not content with seizing Mr Gordon’s home, the agents acting for the AIB attempted to seize another property owned by an unconnected family who live in Rattray, Blairgowrie, whose surname is also Gordon.
Jane Irvine, SLCC Chair : £300 a day for some, benefits seized to pay lawyers for others as regulator accused of failure to clip disputed fees. It is clear from persistent failures & a reluctance on the part of the Scottish Legal Complaints Commission (SLCC) to use their powers to abate or nullify disputed legal fees, that had the SLCC chose to exercise its powers in Mr Gordon’s case, he would not have been facing the wrath of courts, the Accountant in Bankruptcy & attempts to throw him onto the street over fees a law firm are claiming for walking away from his case. Diary of Injustice tackled these issues in last week’s report here : Solicitors regulator blamed for failure to use powers on fees as accountants seize Disability benefits to pay Perth law firm for collapsed court case,
The official went onto tell Diary of Injustice that her organisation had received numerous reports of law firms threatening clients with bankruptcy if they did not pay what appear to be dubious demands for fees. In other cases, law firms have simply gone ahead and made their clients bankrupt without even giving them a chance to question the legitimacy of the fees claimed to be owed.
The Accountant in Bankruptcy was asked to explain why Mr Gordon’s bank accounts & benefits payments had now been unfrozen after the media coverage. The AIB refused to issue any comment.
It has also been revealed the Financial Ombudsman is investigating why Mr Gordon’s bank accounts were seized and why benefits payments were also frozen by the AIB. While the Financial Ombudsman has declined to comment on the case, documents provided to them appear to raise serious questions over the validity of court documents coming out of Perth Sheriff Court which were used to ‘sequestrate’ Mr Gordon and put him through months of torture.
Since last week’s report, a number of individuals have contacted Diary of Injustice with regard to problems with the Accountant in Bankruptcy, and their agents apparently seizing benefits payments on multiple occasions. Coincidentally or not, some of these cases also relate to dubious fee demands by law firms who have left their clients with ruined legal cases.
Indeed, the trend of law firms using threats of bankruptcy against clients appears not to have gone unnoticed by the Scottish Government, reported in last week’s article where a senior source in the Government acknowledged there was a growing problem with law firms threatening clients over legal fees. He went on to say he believed law firms were using their influence in local courts to easily obtain bankruptcy orders against clients who have little or no chance of obtaining legal representation to challenge the law firms demands.
Diary of Injustice would like to hear from any reader who has endured difficulties with the Accountant in Bankruptcy and law firms demanding fees which cannot be substantiated. Please contact us with your information via : scottishlawreporters@gmail.com
These people should be jailed. As someone said in the previous report of this case "they do this because they are able" in other words no one to stop them.
ReplyDeleteMy sister had a horrific time just like Mr Gordon. Now Kippen Campbell as you covered up what happened to this person you are not entitled to fees. These coverups between the medical and legal mafia are standard practice in cases for non visible injuries.
But of course the Court will side with the law firm that is standard practice too. If any lawyer tells you he or she can sue your employer that lawyer is a liar.
If you were not reporting this DOI Team they would torture him to death.
Nice to see the media exposing crooked AIB as well as crooked lawyers!
ReplyDeleteDisability Benefits payments were illegally seized for nearly FOUR MONTHS by the Accountant in Bankruptcy (AIB) over a wrangle involving debts which a Perth based law firm, Kippen Campbell claim are owed to them over a collapsed court case, appears to have helped the client, Mr William Gordon (also of Perth) finally gain access to money desperately needed for living expenses.
ReplyDeleteThey are also cutting off people's money to starve them into submission. These professions are exceptionally dangerous, because there will be people who have not been fortunate enough to have the DOI Team reporting their case because the team don't know. It is shocking what these criminals are doing and it is even more shocking that their professional unions condone this.
The courts know injuries are constantly covered up but it is a great moneyspinner for these criminals. They have total power and it is a good job the DOI team and some others are on the case. As one political theorist wrote "evil can only prevail when good people do nothing". Good on you all DOI Team.
How much was the actual debt anyway if they went after 2 properties?
ReplyDeleteNice quite racket going on between law firms and the AIB me thinks.Time for more media reporting of this and the seizing of the benefits scam to get the clients to cough up.
ReplyDeleteGood work.
It was against the law to seize state benefits under section 187 of the Social Security Administration Act 1992 which clearly states “On the bankruptcy of a beneficiary, such benefit shall not pass to any trustee or other person acting on behalf of his creditors.”
ReplyDeleteSo Mr Gordon will not be able to get legal representation to sue, like my sister. If he cannot sue in civil law these torturers should be charged under the criminal law and prosecuted accordingly. This case it the tip of the iceberg, there will be many many more.
Mr Gordon apparently discovered his accounts had been unfrozen last weekend, but no one from the AIB has contacted him over the matter or offered explanations as to why they had seized his benefits payments.
ReplyDeleteYes Mr Gordon the rats want to starve you. The stole Peter's families assets, freezing accounts, plundering funds, you name it these scumbags have done it because there was nothing to stop them. They will put a member of the public through utter hell, for £££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££.
A filthy corrupt network of ruthless criminals who have no compunction for what they do. Glad to hear your account has been unfrozen. Long live dissent and journalists with the guts and determination to expose this ruthless criminals for the rats they are. Tortured so Kippen Campbell could have ££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££
after covering up what happened to you. It is another case of standard practice, but the story is outside the SLCC and Law Society.
Don't concern yourself Sally McCartney, you know the Law Society and SLCC will hold you in high esteem. They are fine with what you people do, but furious the story has broke. Welcome the tipping point, where no one trusts a lawyer.
The AIB are clearly corrupt and/or stubbornly malicious - how many others are being made to suffer as Mr Gordon has?
ReplyDeleteClearly the dregs aka known as the legal profession read the Diary of Injustice blog and this is yet another feather in its cap.
I hope Mr Gordon sues the lot of them for the stress and financial hardship he has been made to suffer.
He went on to say he believed law firms were using their influence in local courts to easily obtain bankruptcy orders against clients who have little or no chance of obtaining legal representation to challenge the law firms demands.
ReplyDelete@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
What chance does a member of the public have against these mendacious thugs?
The Accountant in Bankruptcy was asked to explain why Mr Gordon’s bank accounts & benefits payments had now been unfrozen after the media coverage. The AIB refused to issue any comment.
ReplyDeleteI will comment for them. We were aiming to take every penny Mr Gordon had, but realised once the press got hold of the story we would look like real B******s. They still are, trust no lawyer, doctor or accountant.
And this in spite of them claiming last week they didn't know anything about benefits payments etc?
ReplyDeleteAIB = Thugs operating on behalf of the legal profession.I bet their staff have a jolly good laugh at their bankruptcy victims and all the houses floating around on the cheap because of their fine work ruining all our lives!
No doubt there will be hundreds of law firms out there doing the same thing. Hopefully they will be exposed for the criminals they are.
ReplyDeleteNice to end the week on a bit of good news for a change and hope Mr Gordon gets some peace from these villains.
ReplyDeletePayments were illegally seized for nearly FOUR MONTHS by the Accountant in Bankruptcy.
ReplyDeleteThey can do what they want, my sister's doctor and lawyer resposible for working with employer to cut of money.
That was years ago, but AIB in Mr Gordon's case should face criminal charges for the abuse of his human rights.
I wonder how Jane Irvine would like this to happen to her?
ReplyDeleteHey Pete I think you are onto a big story here with this bankruptcy scandal get it all into the papers and spread everywhere so we know what we are dealing!
ReplyDeleteGood to know you are on the case!
So what gives these Sheriffs the right to counter a doctor's opinion and rule against someone because they are too ill to show up?
ReplyDeleteMy god these tin pot dictators in the courtroom need a new set of rules and by the sounds of it a new set of judges.
Seizing benefits for 4 months what a pack of monsters work at this aib make sure you give them as much bad publicity as possible
ReplyDeleteaye Irvine will be happy with her £300 a day and not bothered too much about poor Mr Gordon and all those the slcc step on
ReplyDeleteAlarming this can happen to someone without any appeal to these bankruptcy proceedings and the judges do as they please even against doctors opinions.
ReplyDeleteBest wishes to Mr Gordon and hope for a good outcome!
Evil people.
ReplyDeleteI keep getting e mails about healthcare insurance. I have no doubt these companies will have doctors who write "condition not treatable" and some medic will get a bonus and I will end up in the funeral parlour.
ReplyDeleteSame as lawyers who always have an escape route to evade justice after ruining lives.
Anonymous said...
ReplyDeleteHe went on to say he believed law firms were using their influence in local courts to easily obtain bankruptcy orders against clients who have little or no chance of obtaining legal representation to challenge the law firms demands.
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
A client without rights against the Judicial steamroller. There will always be human rights abusers where their is no balance of power.
I read about the hell the Law Society and the accountants union put the Cherbi family through and now this. Now this man has been tortured for being injured at work.
ReplyDeleteStay away from these professions as far as is practicable. There will be more cases of client torture today. They might as well have taked the food out of Mr Gordon's fridge and cupboards.
So you must be onto something if they unfroze his benefits so quickly.What's the betting the AIB are holding people's benefits until they get 'cooperation' over whatever it is they want?
ReplyDeleteKind of like sticking a gun to already broke people's heads isn't it?
If they will seize benefits for legal fees, they are bad people.
ReplyDeleteScary stuff, might as well take the food out of his mouth. Then his accounts are unfrozen, no doubt as a result of the matter going public.
What values do people have that stoop to these measures? Would they like to be on the receiving end of this kind of treatment? Shocking.
A millionaire ex-solicitor was jailed yesterday for running a lucrative brothel empire.
ReplyDeleteJohn Burrows, who moved into the sex industry after being struck off for forging a dying client’s will, also faces losing his £900,000 home.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2179066/Lawyer-jailed-running-brothel-empire-Horrible-creature-trapped-police-offered-girls-mistake.html#ixzz21y4ByN8L
Perhaps the self regulators are becoming more assertive with their colleagues.
" it appears Sheriffs at Perth Sheriff Court ignored the doctor’s medial opinions and sided with the local law firm who were demanding fees for representing Mr Gordon in the now collapsed medical damages claim"
ReplyDeleteThis is the part that really gets me!
So these Sheriffs (former lawyers themselves) just agree with some law firm claiming they are owed fees even though they walked away from their client who I imagine will find it impossible ever to get legal representation as long as he lives! and if that's not bad enough the Sheriffs bin the doctors letters so the lawyers can have their pound of flesh and then some!
Perth Sheriff Court must be as crooked as hell and so must the courts supervisory body for allowing all this to happen without someone picking up on it!
"I hope Mr Gordon sues the lot of them for the stress and financial hardship he has been made to suffer".
ReplyDelete=================================
He will need a lawyer. He cannot get one just now. This is another aspect of what Kippen Campbell and their mob have done. They know they can freeze disability benefits, among all of their other evil crimes, and the victim will not get a lawyers help.
A truly outrageous situation in a country which is called a democracy. And Jane Irvine's and Austin Lafferty's bureaucracies, and their underwriters Royal Sun Alliance will be pleased because Master Policy payouts are impossible. They have engineered a bulletproof compensation scheme, and lawyer protection racket.
Unfortunately for them they are not yet like Dr Goebbels, able to silence all of the press.
http://www.scottishlegalcomplaints.com/how-to-complain.aspx
ReplyDelete"How to Complain
What you need to know
You must first of all give your legal practitioner the chance to resolve your complaint. If you have not done so, we will ask you to make the complaint to them and it will be recorded by us as premature. We will also write to the practitioner to tell them we have done this. A practitioner is someone who is a solicitor, advocate, commercial attorney, conveyancing or executry practitioner.
If your practitioner is unable to resolve the complaint, you should send it to the SLCC. We deal with three types of complaint; service complaints, conduct complaints and handling complaints.
What kind of complaint do you have?
There are different types of complaints about legal practitioners and you can read a brief description of what they are below. This will help you to select the complaint form which is appropriate to your complaint.
If you would like advice about making a complaint from a member of our Gateway Team, you can call them on 0131 528 5111, send a fax on 0131 528 5110 or by email.
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Well Jane Irvine, your quango's propaganda on the SLCC site is what we expect total B******t. Mr Gordon had his Disability Benefits account frozen by AIB who were acting for the criminals you are meant to deal with to protect the public.
You are human rights violaters, and in a balanced justice system there would be criminal prosecutions. If you people will attempt to starve the disabled for legal fees, you are not fit to practice. No doubt your blood pressures are up but not for Mr Gordon's plight.
An E Bay feedback system naming those that have protected law firms in the SLCC would be nice. As the old saying goes Jane, "if you can't stand the heat get out of the kitchen".
This man has been ruined by professional vermin, who destroy human beings for £££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££.
http://www.scottishlegalcomplaints.org.uk/about-the-slcc/who-we-are.aspx
ReplyDeleteBoard Members
Chair. Jane Irvine
Lay Members
* Iain McGrory
* Siraj Khan
* Ian Gibson
* Fiona Smith
* Samantha Jones
Lawyer Members
* George Clark
* Ian Leitch CBE
* Maurice O'Carroll
I wonder if any of these people would like to explain the following. Why a man injured at work and in the legal and medical profession standard practice, had his injuries covered up has had his Disability Benefits account frozen for Kippen Campbell's fees.
Would they like to explain why this quango did not use their powers to protect Mr Gordon. Same happened with a Glasgow law firm.
The truth is that there is nowhere anyone can get fair treatment in this country against self regulators. Fill offices with people of the same mindset and Mr Gordon's brutal treatment is the inevitable result.
The Board of the SLCC is appointed by Scottish Ministers in consultation with the Lord President of the Court of Session.
ReplyDeleteDavid Buchanan-Cook is our Acting Chief Executive. he is supported by all SLCC staff and in particular, an experienced management team comprising a Personal Assistant, the Finance and Corporate Services Manager, the Investigations Manager and the Gateway Team Manager.
SLCC Board
The Board of the SLCC is appointed by Scottish Ministers in consultation with the Lord President of the Court of Session.
Currently, the Board comprises a lay chair, 5 lay members and 3 lawyer members who were appointed by Scottish Ministers in consultation with the Lord President of the Court of Session.
We must have a minimum of 4 or maximum of 8 lay members and a minimum of 3 or maximum of 7 lawyer members.
Ministers may change the number and balance of the members, but there must always be a majority of lay people. Membership of the SLCC Board is for 5 years as chair and 4 years as a member.
=============================
Propaganda from the Scottish Legal Coverup Commissions web site. "Ministers may change the number and balance of the members", but they will always protect lawyers. That is why they are there.
Trust no lawyer.
"The SLCC was set up under the Legal Profession and Legal Aid (Scotland) Act 2007 to modernise the legal complaints handling system and to enable complaints against the legal profession to be resolved quickly and effectively".
ReplyDeleteQuick and effective resolving of complaints. Oh yes Mr Gordon complaints about Kippen Campbell and the SLCC do nothing. MacAskill's Pipers are playing his tune, an asshole of a justice minister.
About the SLCC
ReplyDelete"In brief, the Scottish Legal Complaints Commission investigates complaints made against legal practitioners in Scotland. MR GORDON STARVED AND KIPPEN CAMPBELL PROTECTED. We operate wholly independently of the legal profession [LIARS]] and government, and are impartial,[LIARS] accessible and independent".[LIARS].
When I look at their web site or the Law Society web site, I think publish 1000, leaflets about my lawyer and hand them out in my home town. This is far more productive and prevents the utter torture of complaining to people who hate my guts. When all roads leading to Rome close [or in this case Edinburgh} go public yourselves.
Target the potential clients in your town to warn them instead of a futile battle with people who think it fine for lawyers to ruin you for their lifestyles. They froze a man's Disability Benefits for four months illegaly and the Law Society and SLCC do nothing to protect him.
What manner of evil are we dealing with, what type of persons can do this to clients who have zero protection. Pure evil. Link all the complaints structures and link all lawyers, employers and insurers. It is not about justice, it is about reputations and money.
http://www.aib.gov.uk/Services/creditorportal
ReplyDelete"Are you owed money by someone? Are you trying to recoup the money owed to you?
This section of the website is for you if:
You are owed money by someone (the debtor)
You are interested in making the person who owes you money bankrupt
What to consider
Bankruptcy has serious consequences for debtors.
The person who owes you money may already be bankrupt. You should be aware that you may not recover the amount you are owed by making someone bankrupt.
You should also consider what it will cost you, how long it will take, whether you are likely to get the money you are owed and who you would like to administer the bankruptcy".
================================
If anyone trusts a Scottish Lawyer they risk being ruined by the Law Society and SLCC and then the AIB. I am sure Mr Gordon like us will never trust a so called professional again.
http://www.scottishlegalcomplaints.com/useful-links.aspx
ReplyDeleteUseful Links
Related Bodies
- Law Society of Scotland
- The Faculty of Advocates
- Scottish Legal Services Ombudsman
- Association of Commercial Attorneys
- Conveyancing & Executry Practitioners
Other Sites
- Citizens Advice Scotland
- Office of Fair Trading
- British and Irish Ombudsman Association
- Asian Ombudsman Association
- Scottish Legal Aid Board
- Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission
- Scottish Solicitors' Discipline Tribunal
- Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service
- Judiciary of Scotland
- Scottish Government
- Scottish Government Justice Department
- Scottish Public Services Ombudsman
- Consumer Focus Scotland
- Scottish Mediation Register
- LawCare
================================
A leaflet campaign is better than trusting any of these.
Kippen Campbell LLP
ReplyDelete48 Tay Street,
Perth, PH 5TR
Avoid at all costs.
“Whatever crushes individuality is despotism.”
ReplyDelete― John Stuart Mill
“Experience hath shown, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny.”
ReplyDelete― Thomas Jefferson
Just as applicable today in Scotland where judicial tyrants operate with impunity.
“A democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of the people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine.”
ReplyDelete― Thomas Jefferson
Or a small faction of organised criminals will dominate the majority through the ignorance of the great unthinking mob.
This is proof that the SLCC are anti-consumer from their inception and that they ARE part of the Law Society of Scotland?
ReplyDeleteThe legislation bringing the SLCC into fruition is a Ruse?
This is not the first time that the AIB have been involved in fraud at the bequest of the Law Society of Scotland?
It is now not enough for Scottish lawyers to double and triple bulk bill, now they must get paid for refusing to take their client's Instructions and acting against their best interests?
Utterly corrupt and morally bereft?
I trust the sitting on hands police stand up and read the riot act to the Crown Office and take the necessary action against these crooked Scottish lawyers and the AIB for their part in unlawful activity with intent to cause their victim as much harm and damage as possible?
£300 a day for fiddling about on complaint against lawyers and here we have a case where this slcc should have done something what a rip off
ReplyDeleteThe sections of the press who remain silent on these matters are no different from the SLCC and Law Society.
ReplyDeleteIt could be argued they are extensions of the SLCC and Law Society.
"He who pays the piper calls the tune". Easy to say when the one who said it is not in Mr Gordon's shoes.
ReplyDeleteTime for some organised protests against all this injustice in Scotland..
ReplyDeleteI have seen people out on the street to encourage clients into lawyers offices. I do not believe this is only due to the economic problems. On the contrary people in debt need legal help.
ReplyDeleteI believe the word is getting out just what this profession really are. I would never trust another one of them.
Well done and your story seems to have got a result - cant get better than that!
ReplyDeleteIf your lawyer ruins you and you want justice here is what happens.
ReplyDeleteAll lawyers will hate your guts. In their offices when you say you want your lawyer sued you can smell the hatred. It REEKS. That is why Mr Gordon cannot get a lawyer to represent him.
Whether it is one or ten thousand of them, they are all bastards.
Anonymous said...
ReplyDeleteMr Cherbi and the DOI Team of investigators.......
Thank You, Thank You, Thank You, Thank You, Thank You,
You are all doing a wonderful job for the Scottish Public.
Keep up the good work, we are so proud of you.
Yes we are so proud of you all, I could not have put this better myself. Thank you from all of us. DOI Team we have right on our side.
Benefits taken to pay lawyers for ruining someone's life and its all happening under the SNP.What will it be like if they get full independence?Probably allow lawyers to take your organs to pay their dummy fees!
ReplyDeleteWe never hear Salmond talking about this blog. Independence Alex, with a lawyer protecting bum like you and the MSP's in charge. No thanks.
ReplyDeleteThe Scottish Legal Compliants Commission aka Law Society wanted to conceal this groups evil activities beneath their innocent exterior.
ReplyDeleteJournalism unfreezed Mr Gordon's benefits not any of these professional protected thugs.
Anonymous said...
ReplyDeleteSo what gives these Sheriffs the right to counter a doctor's opinion and rule against someone because they are too ill to show up?
My god these tin pot dictators in the courtroom need a new set of rules and by the sounds of it a new set of judges.
27 July 2012 20:47
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This is exactly the point!
IT DOES NOT MATTER WHAT THE RULES OR LAWS OF THE LAND ARE? SOLICITOR (SCOTLAND) ACT 1980, LPLA (SCOTLAND) ACT 2007 etc THESE CRIMINALS DO NOT PAY ANY ATTENTION TO THEM.THEY CONSIDER THEMSELVES TO BE ABOVE THE LAW IN SCOTLAND?
When the AIB were caught out committing fraud for the Law Society of Scotland before, guess what?
ReplyDeleteYES THAT IS RIGHT?
The Crown Office failed to prosecute Gillian Thompson, even though there was a prime facie case against her...?
Instead, she was allowed to slink away under the pretence that she had already decided to retire and within weeks was made a Dame by the Queen?
Utter corruption?
Anonymous said...
ReplyDeleteThe AIB are clearly corrupt and/or stubbornly malicious - how many others are being made to suffer as Mr Gordon has?
Clearly the dregs aka known as the legal profession read the Diary of Injustice blog and this is yet another feather in its cap.
I hope Mr Gordon sues the lot of them for the stress and financial hardship he has been made to suffer.
27 July 2012 16:47
##########################################
These criminals have decided they are going to have poor Mr Gordon as their prey?
They do not want to kill him off, instead they want to torture and humiliate him to the Nth degree, disregarding the Law in Scotland in the process because they want this man to suffer and to probably take his own life for having the temerity to think that he COULD get JUSTICE in Scotland?
Mr Gordon is their play thing and they will decide his fate?
They do this because the system in which they operate is a closed system, with no checks and balances and no body to protect the innocent victim, just the way they have engineered it?
These people are intrinsically evil?
They do what they do to us because they can?
But also because the love to wield their power over us, to see us broken and crushed to the point that they take your life from you?
They are LIFE STEALERS?
Anonymous said...
ReplyDeleteTime for some organised protests against all this injustice in Scotland..
30 July 2012 12:28
:::::::::::::::::;::;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:::::::::::::
The more people who are protected from these vindictive cheaters the better?
Where are the police?
Why are they not protecting Scotland's citizens from these butcherers?
If the AIB have been caught oit willfully breaking the law to damage someone into submission then why are arrests not being made?
If the police are incapable of doing their lawful job of protecting the People then the People will have no alternative to protect themselves?
For a start, a Demo outside Kippen Campbell LLP in Perth sounds like a good place to start?
I wonder what the good people of Perth would think of this firm's unlawful behaviour?
Accountant in Bankruptcy unfreezes benefits payments of client caught up in sequestration battle with Perth law firm Kippen Campbell.
ReplyDeleteYes you people are simply rotten to your souls. What an evil cold world we live in.
If Mr Gordon's lawyers have failed to comply with his instructions and failed to represent him, then they are in default of their contract with him?
ReplyDeleteIt is not as if the lawyers can argue that they have withdrawn for any legal reason or moral reason because Scottish lawyers are professional liars. That is part of their job?
That is why Scottish lawyers represent people who they know have committed crimes, under the use that everyone has a right to representation under the human rights legislation?
Given this explanation, the only reason for Kippen Campbell LLP to withdraw from acting for Mr Gordon, may be that the Principal acting for Mr Gordon leaves the firm or dies....?
However, even then they are required to pass their Client to another Scottish lawyers firm so that Mr Gordon's human rights are preserved?
Indeed serious questions have to be asked of Kippen Campbell's motivations and legal authority to pursue Mr Gordon for any fees?
In fact it may be that they have acted unlawfully against Mr Gordon by disregarding his human rights but the system is set up in such a way that Scottish lawyers, the Law Society of Scotland and even the Courts (and now the AIB) will unilaterally take unlawful action against client victims for reasons of vengeance and spite?
Mr Gordon, deserves to be protected from these criminals and be recompensed for these criminals deliberate and calculated efforts to damage him?
Have the DOI team asked the Bold MacAskill for a statement on the AIB apparently breaking the law to comply with the Law Society of Scotland's Instructions to freeze Mr Gordon's benefits, as the AIB is convened under the Justice portfolio?
ReplyDeleteA series of comments posted today have not been published.Given the stated policy on comments and so called "recognition" the author should understand why.
ReplyDelete# Anonymous @ 1 August 2012 11:53
DOI has sourced more helpful information on this case from Scottish Government sources than is available from the Justice Secretary.
A further report and update will follow ...
DOI has sourced more helpful information on this case from Scottish Government sources than is available from the Justice Secretary.
ReplyDelete@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Great DOI Team. Yes we expect nothing from Mr MacAskill and as one commenter stated these people are intrinsiclally evil. I have no doubt Mr Gordon's case is the tip of the iceberg, the same starving technique was used by a Hamilton GP. It will be common practice with these criminals who as someone pointed out, the laws of Scotland do not apply to them.
As a regular reader and comment contributor to your brilliant blog, I am delighted with the work you do exposing this evil people for what they are. The DOI Team cheer me up.
The treatment meted out to Mr Cherbi and Mr Gordon is nothing less than what I expect from these evil people. They use their full power to destroy people who are not part of their club. Merciless mendacious criminals, who operate with the full support of Mr MacAskill.
IT DOES NOT MATTER WHAT THE RULES OR LAWS OF THE LAND ARE? SOLICITOR (SCOTLAND) ACT 1980, LPLA (SCOTLAND) ACT 2007 etc THESE CRIMINALS DO NOT PAY ANY ATTENTION TO THEM. THEY CONSIDER THEMSELVES TO BE ABOVE THE LAW IN SCOTLAND?
ReplyDeleteThe fact is that they are ebove the law. When it happened to a member of my family, [same as Mr Gordon] there was nowhere any help was available. They would have to act against themselves and no lawyer, doctor, accountant, Law Society, SLCC will ever do that.
The sad reality is that our justice Minister Mr Kenny MacAskill thinks Mr Gordon's brutal treatment like many other victims of these criminals is fine. They dominate by not enforcing the law against each other. The rules as the commenter above pointed out are not applicable to these people.
If this situation could be applied to the criminal law a lawyer, accountant or doctor could murder a member of the public and the Police [having been told to stand down] would do what Mr MacAskill is doing, nothing.
Hopefully the Police would not do this, but an enforcer of the law is needed. The Solicitors Scotland Act and the LPLA Act are just words on paper, if a legal enforcer will not act. They are above the Laws of Scotland because no one can enforce the law against them.
They want to dominate every aspect of life but they cannot stop blogs because they would really be a dictatorship. They are a thoroughly dangerous faction of teflon criminals.
No lawyer will ever enforce Mr Gordon's human rights because these people's human rights are more important to them. They are client crushers, and lawyer saviours.
ReplyDeleteA faction so brutal and ruthless act behind closed doors and dominate because the Mr Gordon's of this world are superfluous to them, all he is is money to fuel their vile client crushing machine.
Their power stems from two centuries ago. Aristocracy was ruled out and replaced by democracy because it gave the people rights. Divine rights of Kings to rule was crushed.
This is happening now because these rats are constantly abusing their victims human rights and they are reaping a nemisis of their own making. Utterly shocking in 2012. It is also happening because many politicians support them. It will and must be stopped.
No wonder they have been responsible for client suicides when this is the way they treat human beings.
What about the bank or building society who froze Mr Gordon's benefits they have broken the law too and are equally as guilty as the AIB???? Surely their own in house legal people would have advised them of this???? This is truly fraud on the grand scale I mean we are not talking about a week to ten days man, we are talking according to previous articles four months for christ sake??????????? I'm sure I speak for others when I ask if the DOI team can find out & tell us all what bank or building society agreed with Wylie & Bisset to do this to the poor guy?
ReplyDeleteSounds mysterious!Did someone offer you another award?Good on you for chucking it!You are much better off and do a heck of a lot more good without them!
ReplyDeleteHeck I'd rather come to you than my msp!
http://www.scottishreview.net/KRoy58.shtml
ReplyDeleteAnonymous said...
ReplyDeleteWhat about the bank or building society who froze Mr Gordon's benefits they have broken the law too and are equally as guilty as the AIB???? Surely their own in house legal people would have advised them of this???? This is truly fraud on the grand scale I mean we are not talking about a week to ten days man, we are talking according to previous articles four months for christ sake??????????? I'm sure I speak for others when I ask if the DOI team can find out & tell us all what bank or building society agreed with Wylie & Bisset to do this to the poor guy?
1 August 2012 14:28
=========================================
If my bank was the one involved in this fraud against Mr Gordon I would terminate my business with them forthwith....?
Let us be clear here....The AIB has access to the 'best' and highest paid Scottish lawyers at the drop of a hat....therefore who gave the Legal Advice to the AIB for them to be involved (up to their neck) in defrauding a lawyer's client?
Could it be that the Law Society of Scotland is the source of this legal advice to the AIB?
I think this question should be put to the Law Society of Scotland directly to answer and also to MacAskill, as the AIB is part of the Justice Department?
Notwithstanding that the AIB may have received deliberately false legal advice, they would still be contributory negligent in not scrutinise this legal advice through due diligence?
Maybe Rosemary Winter-Scott (AIB) can reveal who gave her this legal advice?
Dear DOI, can we please have a traffic light rating system for Sottish lawyers?
ReplyDeleteHow else can we be expected to know the clean ones from the utterly corrupt ones?
Is it possible for the Scottish Public to raise a class action against the Law Society of Scotland, the SSDT & the SLCC for their collective efforts to let crooked Scottish lawyers off Scot-Free, so that they can continue to cause harm to their clients?
I want to kow why the police are not interviewing Mr Gordon's lawyers, the Law Society of Scotland and the AIB for their part in this fraud?
ReplyDeleteApparently the bank in question is the TSB!!
ReplyDeleteNo surprises their then.