Thursday, September 01, 2011

Law Society SCDEA ‘info sharing deal’ on mob lawyers wont affect 99% of Scotland’s crooked solicitors who rip-off, steal millions from clients

Scdea_logoSCDEA signs ‘info sharing’ agreement with Law Society over crooked lawyers involved only in crime gangs. AFTER MANY YEARS of chasing ‘crooked lawyers’ linked to Scotland’s criminal underworld apparently without gaining one single conviction, the Scottish Crime & Drug Enforcement Agency (SCDEA) has signed an ‘information sharing’ agreement with the Law Society of Scotland which allegedly grants the Police access to information on lawyers otherwise not shared by the Law Society such as breaches of professional rules, standards or criminal activity. The deal is two-way, with the Law Society expecting Police to inform the notoriously corrupt regulator of information relating to information they gather on rogue lawyers.

However, while Police will supposedly get an “in” to the murky world of Law Society investigations into their own members, the remainder of solicitors clients, both corporate and the ordinary consumer or man on the street, will not be provided with any information on how crooked their lawyer really is or who among the criminal fraternity they are associated with.

If for instance, it turns out an unassuming High Street solicitor or accountant in, say Edinburgh, or even better still, the sleepy Scottish Borders, has been quietly laundering cash & property for Scottish crime & drug lords or even a former-gang-member-turned-informer-now-back-into-crime, other clients of this particular solicitor or accountant will not be told of their lawyer’s dealings & profiteering from the legal underworld. Hardly seems fair now, does it.

A copy of the Law Society-SCDEA information sharing deal can be downloaded at an external link, here : Information Sharing Protocol between Law Society of Scotland & Scottish Crime & Drug Enforcement Agency (pdf) and it is worth noting the Scottish Legal Complaints Commission (SLCC),who are now supposed to be the single gateway for complaints about the legal profession in Scotland, is not covered in the agreement.

Philip YellandShare thee not : Law Society of Scotland’s Regulation Chief Philip Yelland not one to share info on colleagues. Since at least 2009, the SCDEA has been issuing annual reports alleging it’s officers are investigating at least 291 "professionals” employed by Scotland’s crime gangs to organise their highly profitable criminal empires. These “professionals”, who are known to receive large amounts of money for their advice & work, apparently include lawyers, accountants, property agents and surveillance experts, all furthering the ends of crime. However no recorded prosecutions have appeared in the SCDEA’s annual announcements and this year’s latest take on the story, published in June, revealed the SCDEA had been chasing crooked lawyers attached to Scottish mobsters for at least two years, apparently without any success, because the Law Society of Scotland’s regulation department, under the command of Philip Yelland and the notoriously crooked Institute of Chartered Accountants for Scotland (ICAS) were “still investigating” the cases.

In a report published in the Herald newspaper on Monday 6 June, the SCDEA’s director general, Deputy Chief Constable Gordon Meldrum, is reported to have claimed 12 of the specialists “taken out” were key players acting as lynchpins for the top 20% of Scotland’s 360 organised crime groups.

The Herald went onto report “Mr Meldrum is unable to name any of the 12, because of ongoing proceedings against them involving the Crown Office, the Law Society of Scotland and the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland.”

Since the June announcement by the SCDEA, which I reported on here : Two years later, Police Chief refuses to name crooked lawyers & accountants in SCDEA ‘swoop’ because Law Society & ICAS ‘are still investigating’, several insiders have told Diary of Injustice the Law Society & ICAS delays “were making a fool out of attempts to bring their members linked to organised crime, to justice”.

NO CASE TO ANSWER Sunday Mail 17 July 2011CRIME IS OK FOR SOME : Police & Crown Office refused to charge legal aid thief lawyers plundering millions from taxpayers. It has also emerged that while the Law Society of Scotland and the Scottish Crime & Drug Enforcement Agency are today eager for a bit of publicity, other elements of the legal profession linked back to the Law Society, such as the Legal Defence Union, have been ACTIVELY INTERVENING in criminal cases against solicitors and brokering deals with the Scottish Legal Board & Crown Office, deals which allowed up to FOURTEEN crooked lawyers to escape prosecution for LEGAL AID FRAUD, which I revealed in an earlier article published here : FOURTEEN lawyers accused of multi-million pound legal aid fraud escape justice as Scotland’s Crown Office fail to prosecute all cases in 5 years

The fact FOURTEEN crooked lawyers were not prosecuted for stealing MILLIONS OF POUNDS of taxpayers money after the Crown Office REFUSED to prosecute any of them, claiming there was insufficient evidence in each case, makes a mockery of the criminal justice system, the Police, regulation of the legal profession, and attempts to protect public money from fraudsters in the legal establishment.

It is worth noting not one single Police Chief or Scottish Government Minister has criticised any of the Crown Office FOURTEEN REFUSALS to prosecute legal aid fraudster lawyers.

Commenting in the agreement between the SCDEA and the Law Society, Deputy Chief Constable Gordon Meldrum, Director General of the SCDEA said in a Press Release published by the Law Society of Scotland : "We know that serious organised crime groups use the services of specialists, including lawyers, to support their criminal enterprises. Their role is crucial to the ongoing operation of criminal enterprises by providing the means necessary to launder money, acquire property and make other financial investments. Without this expert advice, crime groups would find it very difficult to operate.”

Mr Meldrum continued : "The vast majority of professionals are law abiding citizens, but there are a small number of unscrupulous lawyers, as well as professionals in other sectors, who are operating on behalf of organised crime. Some professionals may find themselves drawn into the criminal underworld through lack of awareness, or they may be subject to threats and blackmail by criminals. Their involvement can lead to reputational damage, loss of employment, a criminal record and even a custodial sentence.That's why our new collaborative agreement with the Law Society of Scotland is so important. We need to know more about who is involved and the nature of their involvement so that we can take steps to disrupt criminal activity."

Cameron Ritchie, president of the Law Society of Scotland, speaking on the smoke & mirrors agreement with the SCDEA for public consumption, said: "This is an important step for both organisations in ensuring the sharing of relevant information which will assist in the detection and disruption of organised crime in Scotland. It is absolutely vital for maintaining public trust and the reputation of the profession that we take the necessary action to ensure that our members adhere to the high regulatory and ethical standards expected of all Scottish solicitors.”

Law Society of ScotlandMore crooked lawyers than ever, yet Mr Ritchie trumpets the usual spin, claiming the Law Society operates a ‘robust regulatory regime’ Mr Ritchie continued : "We have a robust regulatory regime, including financial compliance systems, and know that the vast majority of our members are completely honest in their business practices and work very hard on behalf of legitimate clients. However those who are unscrupulous, those who are coerced into criminal activity or those who inadvertently serve organised crime, need to be identified and dealt with appropriately. "This initiative will further strengthen our financial compliance regime and we welcome the information sharing protocol as a deterrent to those involved in serious organised crime who would seek to use solicitors, or other professionals, to facilitate their activities."

However, all eight of Scotland’s Police forces do not appear to want to work together with the public when it comes to clients reporting their solicitor or accountant to the Police for theft, embezzlement or fraud in a growing number of instances where clients are usually given the cold shoulder by Police even when large sums of money or even property are reported stolen by their solicitors or accountants. In fact, in some cases, the Police have been positively hostile, and even threatening against members of the public who report corruption in the legal world.

In a rising, and perhaps ‘profitable’ (as an ongoing investigation appears to be revealing) trend for some Police Officers, it appears members of the Scottish legal profession are using the Police and even serving Sheriffs as a private army to threaten clients or creditors with grievances, as Scottish Law Reporter recently covered, here : Serving Sheriff’s law firm drafted in to defend Desmond Cheyne QC over French home work dispute, allegations builders ‘were threatened’ by Police

Neither the SCDEA or Law Society of Scotland are compliant with Freedom of Information legislation therefore the public will have to rely on less than believable media announcements from both organisations on how well this information scheme fares.

While the agreement between the Law Society & SCDEA is good for a few announcements, and perhaps Ministerial bragging rights at functions & evening dinners, the vast majority of ‘crooked lawyers’ who generate thousands of complaints from clients every year in Scotland will not be affected, nor will clients of crooked Scottish lawyers have any right to be informed of exactly what their lawyers are up to behind closed doors.

Just try reporting your crooked lawyer to your local Police and see how far you get. Nowhere, very fast, with the chance the solicitor will call in a favour and have the Police target you instead.

24 comments:

  1. So just more BS really from the cops & Law Society.

    I liked how you compared it with the legal aid robbers getting off the hook courtesy of the cops & Lord Advocate.Nice touch.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This agreement is a funny one - If you read through it they are forbidding its publication yet their press officers were whoring themselves all round the newsdesks.The bams caused me to miss my pie & chips

    ReplyDelete
  3. A bit embarrassing for Meldrum to be quoted saying he cant name the lawyers because the Law Society are investigating hahahahaha and now they force him to sign an agreement they probably worded themselves

    P*SH from the cops if you ask me

    ReplyDelete
  4. Why should a Police agency give details to a known corrupt regulator?

    For all we know the Law Society will probably use any info handed back to bury the evidence of corruption.

    I no longer trust the Police anyway as you say they are being used as a private army by some lawyers to get back at their clients who complain.

    ReplyDelete
  5. "It is worth noting not one single Police Chief or Scottish Government Minister has criticised any of the Crown Office FOURTEEN REFUSALS to prosecute legal aid fraudster lawyers."

    The lawyers cops and Scottish Gov Ministers are all making money out of the justice system so its not in their interests to criticise legal aid robbing lawyers is it.

    ReplyDelete
  6. One more reason for solicitors to leave the Law Society of Scotland.

    ReplyDelete
  7. From my own experience cops and lawyers (robbers) are perfect partners in crime.These two should get married.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Spin from the Police/Law Society

    ReplyDelete
  9. "While the agreement between the Law Society & SCDEA is good for a few announcements, and perhaps Ministerial bragging rights at functions & evening dinners, the vast majority of ‘crooked lawyers’ who generate thousands of complaints from clients every year in Scotland will not be affected, nor will clients of crooked Scottish lawyers have any right to be informed of exactly what their lawyers are up to behind closed doors."

    Which is precisely what we can expect from Police involvement with the Law Society.Zip!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Another of these strange unaccountable Police agencies who only show up when requiring to justify huge amounts of public money spent on maintaining them.
    If FMSalmond has any sense he will scrap this lot when a single Scottish Police Force comes along and save a lot of money.

    As for the agreement you refer to.It stinks like a skunk full on.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Your right!No SLCC in the agreement!

    They could be forgiven for forgetting it even existed since the SLCC has done bugger all so far!

    ReplyDelete
  12. That agreement has the potential for the Law Society to get rid of anyone whose face does not fit..

    ReplyDelete
  13. The Police have just signed an information sharing agreement with the largest criminal organisation in Scotland.

    ReplyDelete
  14. This headline from a well known Scottish rag "LAWYERS who ally themselves to organised crime are closer than they think to a “tap on the shoulder” a leading police officer has warned."

    Reality :

    Lawyers who ally themselves to organised crime are closer than they think to giving a "brown paper envelope stuffed with cash to corrupt Police"

    ReplyDelete
  15. Anonymous said...

    The Police have just signed an information sharing agreement with the largest criminal organisation in Scotland.

    1 September 2011 19:09

    I agree.

    ReplyDelete
  16. It just sounds so ridiculous to me the Police have to sign a deal with the Law Society to get information on crooked lawyers when clearly the Law Society should be telling the Police everything without it.

    What next?Will the Police be signing agreements with the mafia to get information on murder hits etc?

    The Police can go after anyone they want when they like but here again we see special treatment for lawyers with the kid gloves out once again.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I see, so the 'ask us no questions and we'll tell you no lies' Law Society of Scotland are suddenly going to spill the beans to the Police - who are also of course completely beyond reproach in matters of honesty.

    More window dressing from McAskill and Co.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Strange.This leaves more questions than answers and it looks almost as if they published this just to counter what you wrote about it in your earlier post!

    Why didn't the Police do this when they said they were pursuing crooked lawyers in 2009?

    ReplyDelete
  19. Having read this and that agreement I cannot for the life of me understand why the Police have to grovel to the Law Society for info on which lawyers are crooked.

    Really why do we have a Police Service at all if they cant even do the detecting themselves and who is to say the Law Society will provide truthful information?

    Scotland has turned into a really odd place you can all forget about getting justice with these kinds of people in their jobs.

    ReplyDelete
  20. What is this SCDEA?
    Is it some Scottish version of the Met?
    Are they just too damn lazy to hack these crooked lawyers they have to agree to do it via the Law Society instead?
    What a joke!

    ReplyDelete
  21. Fat lot of use the SCDEA are.

    This is the same lot who interviewed Cocaine head Steven Purcell and did bugger all about it except tell him his name had cropped up in one of their investigations.I doubt anyone will believe they will go after any lawyer or even be allowed to go after any lawyer by the wimpy Crown Office who are allowing all those legal aid crooks to run off without some well deserved jail time!

    Now lets remember the SCDEA (sounds a bit more like a quango if you read the scandal sheets) were created by New Liebour and lets remember Glasgow City Council is run by ........!

    Couldnt be any political bias in the lack of arrests surely!

    http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/home-news/purcell-the-end-of-the-line-1.1011630

    The officers of the Scottish Crime and Drug Enforcement Agency are not average police.

    The detectives of the elite squad don't spend their days huckling shoplifters or sweeping drunks off the streets at closing time.

    Instead, their duties are focused on the most serious and violent criminals in the country.

    They investigate the bosses of organised crime, seize their drugs, and freeze cash and assets."

    So when two SCDEA officers spoke to Steven Purcell last year about his name cropping up in an investigation, it was never going to be a run-of-the-mill chat.

    That meeting, in Mr Purcell’s office in Glasgow’s City Chambers on May 12 last year, was the first glimpse of the scandal which finally broke around him last week.

    Questioned afterwards by his closest colleagues, the leader of Glasgow City Council denied he was using cocaine, but admitted to having dabbled with the drug in the past.

    It also emerged that some of those around him in the Yoker area of the city, where he grew up, were the subject of the SCDEA’s interest. Mr Purcell was also warned by his aides that they would resign if he took drugs again.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Yes good point about the lawyers who got away with legal aid fraud.

    If the cops manage to catch any lawyer without rigging the evidence against them the Crown Office will probably screw up the case when it gets to court so no worries really and they can all blame each other in the headlines later on.

    ReplyDelete
  23. This "agreement" is based on the scdea going after 10 or 11 solicitors at the most out of 10,000.If the Law Society feel they have to sign such an agreement without even consulting the profession they are unfit for purpose.

    ReplyDelete
  24. There's a story on the SCDEA's website about an indecency charge - why do we need a special Police outfit to do this kind of stuff?
    Roll on a single Scottish Police force

    ReplyDelete

Comments should encourage & promote an acceptable & respectful level of public debate on law & legal issues, the judiciary, courts & justice system.

All comments are subject to moderation. Anonymous comments are enabled.
Abusive or unacceptable comments will not be published.
Comments & links to material may not always be published but will be noted and investigated.

Sourced information, news leaks, or cases with verifiable documentation for investigation should be emailed to blog journalists.