For some in the legal system this week, it will be a time of celebration, as Mr Stuart Gair, a victim of a terrible injustice sadly died before receiving compensation for false imprisonment or a true accounting of why he went to jail and who was to blame for his injustice.
Mr Stuart Gair, who was jailed in 1989 for a murder he did not commit, died earlier this week of a heart attack, after spending 17 years protesting his innocence, and successfully seeing the Court of Appeal quash his murder conviction and the Judges attack the failure of the Crown Office to disclose witness statements to his lawyers.
A quote from the Scotsman newspaper article :
Jailed for life, he served 12 years but protested his innocence from day one. He was released in 2000 pending an appeal, but it took a further six years before his conviction was quashed at the Court of Appeal in Edinburgh in July last year. He insisted he had been the victim of a police frame-up.
Mr Gair, originally from Alloa, was cleared after it was ruled he had suffered a miscarriage of justice. In the judgment delivered by the Appeal Court, Lord Abernethy said it meant "the defence were deprived of a powerful argument on the crucial issue of identification".
Failure to disclose ... a common tactic of the Crown in many prosecutions has become an almost common factor in cases of injustice in the criminal legal system these days, and still the Scottish Executive Government have done nothing with regard to reforming laws on disclosure, although as recent reviews recommended reforms, we have yet to see any movement in the slow area of Scots Law on this issue.
I said earlier there would be celebrations in some quarters over the untimely death of Mr Gair, and I'm not just being cynical, I'm speaking from experience.
Those who caused Mr Gair's injustice, to be locked up in jail for a crime he didn't commit, will most likely be using his untimely death as an excuse to counter any call for a substantive accounting of their actions in this case - it happens all too often, a victim dies, and that is the end of the story, the people who are truly guilty escape justice and injustice continues with the silence of the dead, no longer able to question those who for their own ends altered the course of justice to injustice, a now familiar term in Scots Law.
Those who thrive on injustice, profit from injustice and cause injustice, can never be allowed to escape their crime, and those responsible in the case of Stuart Gair, should for all our sakes, and that of the Scots legal system, be held accountable for their actions of depriving an individual of his freedom, on the premise of a lie.
Articles from the Scotsman & Herald follow :
Innocent man jailed for 12 years dies just months before £1m compensation
TANYA THOMPSON AND EAMONN O'NEILL
THE victim of one of Scotland's most shocking miscarriages of justice has died, months before he was to receive £1 million in compensation.
Stuart Gair, who was jailed in 1989 for murder, died yesterday at Edinburgh Royal Infirmary following a heart attack.
Mr Gair, 44, who spent 17 years protesting his innocence, was last year cleared by appeal judges who attacked a failure to disclose witness statements to his lawyers.
Jailed for life, he served 12 years but protested his innocence from day one. He was released in 2000 pending an appeal, but it took a further six years before his conviction was quashed at the Court of Appeal in Edinburgh in July last year. He insisted he had been the victim of a police frame-up.
Mr Gair, originally from Alloa, was cleared after it was ruled he had suffered a miscarriage of justice. In the judgment delivered by the Appeal Court, Lord Abernethy said it meant "the defence were deprived of a powerful argument on the crucial issue of identification".
John McManus, co-ordinator for Glasgow-based Mojo, the Miscarriages of Justice Organisation, said he was with Mr Gair when he died.
He added: "This is a tragedy. Stuart had been waiting for compensation and the whole thing had put him under a lot of strain. He had suffered dreadfully, and had only just started to get some counselling."
In 1989 after a five-day trial at the High Court in Glasgow, Mr Gair was found guilty of murdering Peter Smith, a former soldier, who was stabbed in Glasgow city centre.
Mr Gair denied murder and put forward a defence of alibi, insisting he was in another part of Glasgow at the time. But he was convicted on a majority verdict.
He protested his innocence and campaigners rallied to his cause. Eventually, his case was sent to the Appeal Court by the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission.
Mr Gair had petitioned the Scottish Secretary over his case and was freed on bail in 2000. Identification was the key issue at the trial and lawyers acting for Mr Gair argued that, crucially, the Crown failed to disclose important information to his defence.
During the trial, a witness, Brian Morrison, who was 19 at the time, identified Mr Gair as a man he saw come out of public toilets and go in the direction of North Court Lane, where the attack happened.
In an initial statement, he said he would definitely be able to identify the two men he had seen and that one of them had threatened him.
But later, he told officers: "A lot of what I have already told the police is not the truth. I made up some of it to attract attention."
Mr Gair's defence counsel, Gordon Jackson, QC, argued that if this information had been available to his lawyers Mr Morrison could have been cross-examined in such a way as to show the jury they could not trust a word he said.
A note had been attached to Crown papers for the trial which said that at one point Mr Morrison had signed himself into a psychiatric hospital. It went on: "Morrison and his vivid imagination certainly set the police off on the trail of a red herring initially."
In the Appeal Court judgment, Lord Abernethy concluded: "In these circumstances, we have come to the conclusion that the non-disclosure of these police statements and other information resulted in a miscarriage of justice."
Sources close to Mr Gair said that, had he lived, he would have received about £1 million in compensation.
and now for the report from the Herald :
Miscarriage of justice victim Gair dies
LUCY ADAMS. Chief Reporter
Stuart Gair, the Scot who spent 17 years waiting to prove he was wrongfully convicted of murder, has died of a heart attack just 15 months after clearing his name.
Mr Gair, 43, suffered the attack on Friday while being filmed by Donal McIntyre, the investigative journalist. He was taken to hospital but died yesterday afternoon.
Last night, friends paid tribute to the man who spent 12 years in prison, wrongfully accused of murder.
Mr Gair was only 25 when, by a majority verdict, a jury convicted him of the brutal murder of 45-year-old Peter Smith during a knife attack in Glasgow city centre.
Mr Smith, a former soldier of West Plean, Stirlingshire, was stabbed in the chest at North Court Lane on April 11, 1989, and died later from his injuries in hospital. Mr Gair denied committing the offence, but was found guilty and sentenced to life imprisonment.
He had put forward a defence of alibi, maintaining that he was in another part of Glasgow at the time of the murder, which occurred near toilets at St Vincent Place.
His fight to clear his name attracted a number of high-profile campaigners. His case was referred back to the Appeal Court by the Scottish Criminal Cases Review in 1999.
In 2000, he was freed on appeal, and began a lengthy series of court hearings.
The question of identification was the key issue at the trial and lawyers acting for Mr Gair argued that, crucially, the Crown had failed to disclose important information to his defence at the time of the trial.
During the trial, a witness, Brian Morrison, who was 19 at the time, identified Mr Gair and his former co-accused as two men he saw come out of the toilets and go in the direction of North Court Lane, a well-known hang-out for homosexuals.
He said he had a good look at the two men and studied their faces carefully. But in previous statements to police, he had given conflicting information.
During an initial statement, he said he would definitely be able to identify the two men he saw and that one of them had threatened him.
But later he told officers: "I have to tell you that a lot of what I have already told the police is not the truth and I made up some of it to attract attention to myself."
Last year when Mr Gair's conviction was overturned he said he was relieved but "shattered".
John McManus, of Miscarriages of Justice Organisation (Mojo), said the stress of being wrongfully locked up had killed Mr Gair. "All we can do now is hope his death will prevent other people having to go through the same circumstances without any support or trauma counselling.
"He was released without any support whatsoever. People have no idea of the level of stress this puts people under.
"Like all of those who have been wrongfully convicted, he was suffering from severe post traumatic stress and he hadn't even received his financial compensation.
"There has to be better support put in place to help people in these circumstances."
Mr McManus said he died at 12.40pm yesterday. It is thought the funeral will be organised by Mojo.
Well said as always Peter.
ReplyDeleteRest In Peace Stuart … robbed of the best years of your life, and very cruelly brutalized in the process, by Scotland’s wicked, corrupt, rotten, uncaring and unaccountable penal and (in)justice system … and robbed of the £1 million pounds in compensation you so richly deserved.
Hopefully you are now in a much better place my friend … where the cruelties of this world (Scotland’s world) can no longer reach you.
Another unforgivable travesty of Scottish (in)justice.
WHO will be next?
http://shirleymckie.myfastforum.org/STUART_GAIR_ANOTHER_LOSS_TO_THE_SYSTEM__about73.html
http://shirleymckie.myfastforum.org/forum1.php
http://www.mojoscotland.com/news.html
I was beginning to think they had got you too after no updates to your blog.
ReplyDeleteKeep up the good work Peter and I will keep reading your work.Excellent stuff as always and dont let those SNP bastards and the rest of them get away with injustice.They are all just as bad as each other at the end of the day.
al - I second your comment.
ReplyDeleteIn answer to your question WHO will be next? I think theres a good chance it might be Cherbi himself.He must be a huge thorn in their side after writing all this stuff!Good to know there are people around like Cherbi ,Iain McKie and others who do something about this corruption all around us.
RIP Stuart Gair
snp brownshirts on the way to kill off injustice victims ?Fuck I will be staying away from Scotland this is some party you guys have going there.whens the swastika replacing the blue & white cross ?
ReplyDeletelast comment a bit strong but I agree the SNP are not doing much on justice or injustice
ReplyDeletebtw good blog and Im sure you keep many people on their toes with this stuff.
good luck to all
‘The Procurator Fiscal must hold a FAI when a death was caused during employment, or while in legal custody, i.e. while being held at a police station or prison.
ReplyDeleteIn other circumstances, the Procurator Fiscal can hold a FAI where there are issues of public safety or matters of general public concern arising from a death and there is a need to highlight hazardous or dangerous circumstances or systems that have caused or contributed to it.
At the end of a FAI, a Sheriff makes a determination. The determination will set out:
where and when the death occurred;
· the cause of death;
· any precautions by which the death might have been avoided; and
· any defects in systems that caused or contributed to the death.’
http://www.crownoffice.gov.uk/About/roles/pf-role/investigation-deaths/fatal-accident
It occurs to me that Mr. Gair’s tragic death falls exactly into these categories. His death certainly is a matter of public concern, his death might well have been avoided and the system that stalled and stumbled for 18 long years surely contributed to his death.
#Al @ 2.13pm
ReplyDeleteAgree with you completely.
#Ben@ 7.47pm
Still here, still writing, still ensuring things get into the media when they should... despite a few attempts to prevent it ...
#Anonymous @ 9.20pm
Wouldn't be the first time it was tried on a critic ...
#Anonymous @ 3.54am
If they start censoring criticism, burning books & blaming their own woes & excesses on their victims ... that will be the time to worry. Hmm, that almost sounds like a description of the Law Society's practices ...
The "blue and white cross" is called the Saltire. I don't think it needs a logo inside it as we aren't a one party state yet and neither should we ever be.
Scotland is bigger than any one political party, and if one party is only ruling for some of the people some of the time, instead of all of the people all of the time, I'm sure another will eventually take it's place.
Iain McKie @ 9.47am
ReplyDeleteIain - well said, and I agree with you entirely.
I think the circumstances of Mr Gair's death certainly do qualify for an FAI, and it is certainly in the public interest for one to take place, given Mr Gair's suffering at the hands of a terrible injustice.
Dear All
ReplyDeleteI also agree there should be an FAI into the death of Mr Gair,but what would happen if the FAI found, as we all know,Mr Gair died because of the way he was treated by the Justice System.Would such a finding be possible in Scotland? IF so it would tell us all what we already know - The Justice System and those who run it,are killers and enjoy it.
To PeterCherbi - Amazing blog you have here.Keep up the good work as everyone says.
I admire your tenacity.Lawyers are rich scum and they get richer by robbing people.Feed them to the dogs.
ReplyDelete