tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post5106404820868203395..comments2024-03-24T23:01:57.640+00:00Comments on The Justice Diaries: Appeal lodged against High Court’s takedown of Solicitors from Hell, ICO tells Law Society CEO Des Hudson ‘to live with consumer criticism of lawyers’Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger49125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-36439712176135389272012-01-09T13:40:01.892+00:002012-01-09T13:40:01.892+00:00The Law Societies widespread maltreatment of clien...The Law Societies widespread maltreatment of clients over the decades, has destroyed their integrity as regulator of lawyers and protector of the public. Enough of us now know from dealing with them that their Statutory duty to protect clients is a worthless lie. <br /><br />Put it this way, if everyone made false promises the institution of trust would collapse. In his book In Defence of Politics Bernard Crick wrote "where there is no freedom of speech there is no politics, where there is total freedom in relationships there is no love". <br /><br />The Law Societies total freedom to cover up lawyer criminality behind office doors has wrecked that vital factor in all relationships of any worth, trust.<br /><br />People are realising that contacting the Law Societies is a futile waste of time and Tugendhat's ruling against Solicitors From Hell is an attempt to crush the political rights of the public to work together just the same way as the Law Societies do, with one major difference, clients are telling the truth. <br /><br />The Law Societies are staffed by intelligent people, but intelligence and common sense are not the same thing. Their years of abusing clients has got to the stage, few people in the know trust any lawyers. <br /><br />The Law Societies would shut every internet site if they could. Their treatment of Rick Kordowski proves that they see clients as enemies, fair game for expliotation and Tugendhat has stamped his seal of approval as being anti client. He has shot the messenger rather than deal with those like myself who have posted the truth on Rick's site. I thank Rick for giving me the opportunity to do what the Law Society are against, naming and shaming their crooked membership,Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-27929167719929776422012-01-09T02:00:49.701+00:002012-01-09T02:00:49.701+00:00Hudson's comments prove he cannot stand lawyer...Hudson's comments prove he cannot stand lawyers being on the receiving end of the way they treat clients.<br /><br />What goes around comes around. The boomerang effect Hudson, crooked lawyers will be extinct.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-73310771151115026832012-01-09T01:20:19.340+00:002012-01-09T01:20:19.340+00:00The Law Societies of the UK are as driven to prote...The Law Societies of the UK are as driven to protect their membership as the Nazi SS were driven to protect Adolf Hitler. <br /><br />People have resorted to web sites because the Law Societies are dedicated to client injustice. The venom of Hudson and Tugendhat just reinforce this fact.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-21191769468358270592012-01-09T01:03:07.965+00:002012-01-09T01:03:07.965+00:00Mr Hudson,
Joe Bloggs has been ruined by a lawyer...Mr Hudson,<br /><br />Joe Bloggs has been ruined by a lawyer. He goes to multiple law firms and cannot get a lawyer to help him. So Mr Hudson, I will tell everyone what the Law Societies should be saying if they were honest.<br /><br />1) If any lawyer helps a ruined client The Law Societies will withdraw their practicing certificate.<br /><br />2) All lawyers are insured by the same company so through the Law Societies and the latter do not want their insurers pating damages to anyone.<br /><br />3) Paying damages will cost the Law societies more through increased insurance premiums. <br /><br />4) The Law Societies will stop anyone's Legal Aid (if they could get it) and ruin any lawyer acting against another lawyer.<br /><br />5) The Law Societies want this system as it is because it is profitable, exonerates crooked lawyers and is very efficient at leaving unimportant clients rightless.<br /><br />Hudson said the web site was a danger to the public. What planet is he on, certianly not planet reality.LAW SOCIETIES, LEGALISE CRIMINALLITYnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-30959999496640937932012-01-08T14:26:38.283+00:002012-01-08T14:26:38.283+00:00Have you ever sat in a meeting and you say somethi...Have you ever sat in a meeting and you say something and the person you are dealing with goes silent. It because they know you are right but they want the opposite to be the reality.<br /><br />This is what happens in Councils where there is a manager protecting corrupt housing officers and it reviles me because someone is being framed because the housing officers colleague has complained about an innocent woman because her grandchildren cannot run through the accused woman's garden. It is an abuse of power and the only way to resolve it is to take the problem onto the streets letting others know what is happening.<br /><br />Where there is an office,and a compliant from someone connected to the office there will be corruption and I have a hunch. Out there on the streets there are others who have been treated the same way. And housing officers and council employees know when the latter complain even if they are lying the FOI Act will protect them.<br /><br />So an innocent person could be intimmidated out of their council home. <br /><br />Just like the Law Society, MacAskill sent me a letter on FOI stating the Law Society is a Professional Organisation therefore exempt. How convenient Kenneth. So professional theives are protected just like council employees. Where is that vital balance of power? <br /><br />They must never control cyberspace.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-66343981529977950802012-01-08T14:06:05.816+00:002012-01-08T14:06:05.816+00:00Hi Des Hudson,
Amazon has just introduced seller ...Hi Des Hudson,<br /><br />Amazon has just introduced seller feedback, going the same way as E Bay. It will become the internet standard. So Des if you buy a laptop from Amazon, or E Bay and you can rate your experience of the seller (which protects other buyers) but you do not want me to rate you, or any of the the other lawyers in Britain. Online we have a balance of power developing, buyers and sellers rate each other. Your faction cannot expect different treatment because you are not selling laptops, you are dealing with individuals life savings, mortgages, wills, etc. Grow up Des, and face reality, consumer attitudes are changing and lawyers because of their onmipotence cannot be exempt from feedback. The culture of the Legal Services industry must change because we will never give up protecting others from the scourge of croooked lawyers. If that is too painful for you to handle resign. <br /><br />Not being able to rate our lawyers my friend is sharp practice, and what is worse your lawyers take on cases against their own insurers and do not tell their clients. <br /><br />Those who are afraid of feedback are not to be trusted.Face reality Des Hudsonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-44657971369606380162012-01-08T13:26:33.333+00:002012-01-08T13:26:33.333+00:00Joe Platt insisted that the Society always worked ...Joe Platt insisted that the Society always worked in the best interests of the public.<br />=================================<br /><br />Just Like Douglas Mill protecting the Master Policy by his mendacity at the Justice 2 committee.<br /><br />Your family of lawyers may trust you Joe, we do not. Joe, your statement is in direct conflict with the University of Manchester's researchers. It should be called The Liars Society.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-9217978786224581902012-01-08T13:09:32.172+00:002012-01-08T13:09:32.172+00:00David Cameron £4m - Prime Minister, First Lord of ...David Cameron £4m - Prime Minister, First Lord of the Treasury and Minister for the Civil Service<br /><br />The PM and his wife both come from wealthy backgrounds and enjoy substantial property assets of their own: their London home has been valued at £2.7million and their constituency house at £1million. Mrs Cameron’s work as the creative director of Smythson, the upmarket stationers, earned her a £300,000 bonus. Both are in line to inherit fortunes from their parents: the combined wealth of the Camerons’ parents has been put as high as £30million. <br /><br />Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/election/article-1280554/The-coalition-millionaires-23-29-member-new-cabinet-worth-1m--Lib-Dems-just-wealthy-Tories.html#ixzz1is7DIMSSAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-22179110240757147232012-01-08T12:59:31.756+00:002012-01-08T12:59:31.756+00:00Look Desmond old boy, are your Scottish chums goin...Look Desmond old boy, are your Scottish chums going to target BentJudges.com or any other of the campainers sites? They are all true too yes Douglas Mill is a crook, so are all of the others but do these sites present a danger to the public. <br /><br />Let me give you some advice, people in holes should stop digging. If I lied in a Court of Law I would face the consequences. But the lawyers Court of Law in many instances bypasses public courts and allows people like you to deal with your members who pay your Law Society for practicing certificates. If a lawyer is struck off you lose money because he does not need a certificate. <br /><br />Similarly if a client is entitled to compensation would you lose your no claims bonus. If you watch Michael Moores Sicko, doctors get large bonuses for writing condition not treatable. One doctor confessed this to Congress because people on Medicare are dying when theyr condition is treatable.<br /><br />People need to start seeing lawyers as bank managers, or insurance company managers, you link justice to money and the lawyer is saved and the insurers DO NOT PAY OUT. <br /><br />I am not surprised you are on £400,000.00 per annum, you must be saving the Law Societies insurers great sums of money. <br /><br />PS Watch Sicko, and you will see Law Society practices in the Medicare world. Taking out insurance against illness is a waste of money, the conditions not treatable are infinite. <br /><br /><br />Oh Blue Chip companies are taking out life insurance policies on their employees. They complained they were losing money because too few of their employees were passing away, see Sicko.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-17995605673222954672012-01-07T22:39:40.024+00:002012-01-07T22:39:40.024+00:00There are some fantastic passionate contributions ...There are some fantastic passionate contributions on here...<br /><br />These Lawyers, Judges, Sheriffs, and Prosecuters claim to deal in the business of TRUTH but instead they trade in lies.<br /><br />They claim to be righteous with characters above reproach but instead they involve themselves in vice and corruption.<br /><br />Justice used to be the Pillar of Principle that held the system aloft.<br /><br />Now sadly, that Pillar upon which Justice was built has been reduced to rubble and sand due to the carelessness and neglect by successive custodians of the system, who have not felt the need to put the work in to maintain the standards required to preserve Justice.<br /><br />So that we now have 'their justice', which is literally a poor-mans justice.<br /><br />A hap-hazard, pot-luck justice system, which is no longer determined upon the Legal Principles at issue but can be determined by a variety of variables that are subject to continuous influence.<br /><br />Quite simply, greed and a system that has steadily and continuously been steered towards self interest has ruined the system beyond repair.<br /><br />These people have shown by their repeated actions that they are drunk on power and are no longer capable of steering the ship.<br /><br />There is only one solution and they Lawers will have to reorganise themselves quickly if they are ever going to have the trust of the public again:<br /><br />(i) The Law Society of Scotland no longer represents its members and has become a power crazed monster.<br /><br />Disband it.<br /><br />(ii) There must then be three distinct specialist organisations, all who have transparent and public supported regulation.<br /><br />Those who Prosecute and they will belong to a distinct separate organisation from those who Defend.<br /><br />The third separate organisation will be those who Judge, who will matriculate into a new organisation only if and when they have demonstrated an outstanding and longlasting ability to attain the high moral standards, far higher than those shown by their peers, to justify their position.<br /><br />Each discipline then can concentrate on ensuring the performance of their own members is maintained to a high level of skill and expertise and each discipline will not be holding to one another, as it is now.<br /><br /><br /><br />Then we will have our Justice back.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-54447441835901210562012-01-07T21:35:33.530+00:002012-01-07T21:35:33.530+00:00I said before - action is what is now needed.
Pet...I said before - action is what is now needed.<br /><br />Peter has stated he wants people to name and shame. People will not do so until libel and harassment laws are clarified. Fact.<br /><br />Over to you Peter. There will be a great deal going on in 2012 regarding Libel Reform and I hope you continue to play a part. Please understand in the meantime why folks are still on the back foot. These people need support - not words but action.<br /><br />Still lots of work to be done.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-1182438154766694202012-01-07T20:31:21.971+00:002012-01-07T20:31:21.971+00:00This would be like a company using the courts to s...This would be like a company using the courts to shut down Which? and their website just because they had criticised products etc<br /><br />Evidence enough the courts are utterly corrupt.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-39563646140172615412012-01-07T20:00:51.389+00:002012-01-07T20:00:51.389+00:00“In giving due weight to freedom of expression in ...“In giving due weight to freedom of expression in cases like this we have to accept that enforcing the data protection principles in respect of the activities of the website owner is likely to entail a disproportionate level of interference with the rights of the contributors, (WELL SAID I TOTALLY AGREE) however unpleasant their contributions may be.” <br /><br />Mr Hudson what is happening here is that you so used to self regulations advantages are attempting to use any means to close web sites. This is an outrage and I can assure you the more you can close the more will appear on the web. The internet is owned by no one, freedom of expression is vital for us. Self regulation is simply avoiding the consequences of actions. It is outdated, outragous and a crime against innocent people who are forced to trust criminals who know they are 100% above the law. Where there is an office there will be a coverup. <br /><br />Oh and all those good reputable firms you rant about. The profession is not reputable, a law breaking rabble who look after each others interests.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-7241380971231455432012-01-07T19:24:56.385+00:002012-01-07T19:24:56.385+00:00Appeal lodged against High Court’s takedown of Sol...Appeal lodged against High Court’s takedown of Solicitors from Hell, ICO tells Law Society CEO Des Hudson ‘to live with consumer criticism of lawyers’ <br />=================================<br />You see Hudson it is YOU and your LAWYER CHUMS who have to face the repugnant reality that Law Society power is crumbling. We have battlescars still raw from being treated as unimportant by office based corruption, and your days are numbered. People have had enough of a profession who want to protect each other and exploit the many. No more Hudson, your Law Society which blocks clients from the courts to save a lawyers career and leave us ruined. As Sherlock Holmes would say "Look my dear Hudson you have to learn your place and face the real consequences of your actions". In a dispute between client and lawyer the latter always win, not due to honesty but due to self regulation.<br /><br />We Hudson are regulating you whether you like that or not. If I could send my complaint to you or put it on a web site you would never receive it. Complaining to the Law Societies is a frustrating experience and clients have learned, bypass the Law Societies of the UK if you want justice. <br /><br />It is like World War II on the Eastern Front, like the partisans we target the supply lines (OF NEW CLIENTS) and tell people what the Law societies really stand for. INJUSTICE. <br /><br />No one will steal your childrens inheritance Hudson, and we will stop your lawyers stealing our kids money too by driving your lawyers out of business. Crooked lawyers are going to be extinct.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-59735810607137581782012-01-07T16:44:37.532+00:002012-01-07T16:44:37.532+00:00The courts are just another branch of the Law Soci...The courts are just another branch of the Law Society as far as justice for anyone who is not a lawyer is concerned. Tugendhat thinks we will stop them any way we can, these uneducated clients who dare question professionals like us.<br /><br />Time to fall of the plinth you put yourself on Tugendhat, you are nothing special just a man in a powerful job. Your rulings just reinforce what we already know.<br /><br />1) A member of the public cannot sue a lawyer.<br /><br />2) Lawyers are intolerant people who want to lord their power over clients but fear feedback from clients. <br /><br />Hudson known what every lawyer and we know, lawyers can do what they want to people and that is why SFH and other sites sare critical. If structural engineers worked like lawyers they buildings would collapse around us. <br /><br />Plato's character Glaucon said "we can have secret societies to cover up our crimes and appear respectable to the polity". The Law Society in a nutshell.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-91717545767953644462012-01-07T15:38:48.568+00:002012-01-07T15:38:48.568+00:00If the Law Society wants to make a fool of the UK ...If the Law Society wants to make a fool of the UK legal system by using it to shut down consumer review websites then let it.The result will be much less business for lawyers as people become ever more suspicious of who they are dealing with and more websites dedicated to naming & shaming those who claim to be able to obtain justice for their clients while in reality they are milking them and the system.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-24166181551051691462012-01-07T15:32:31.420+00:002012-01-07T15:32:31.420+00:00So Mr Hudson does not like clients having their sa...So Mr Hudson does not like clients having their say. This is because he known deep down the Law Society is as corrupt as hell and they have left many thousands of people ruined over the decades. <br /><br />Your Law Society Mr Hudson is like the church, there comes a point when children grow up and the truth comes out. Clients of lawyers know from bitter experience the Law Society specialise in Legal exoneration. Behind closed doors you engineer the outcome that protects corrupt solicitors. You do not like spoonfuls of your own medicine do you?Law Society rot is catching up with themnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-17436687233881938482012-01-07T12:24:56.124+00:002012-01-07T12:24:56.124+00:00To the tosser yesterday at 18:14 who said he was g...To the tosser yesterday at 18:14 who said he was going to steal from his clients<br /><br />I look forward to seeing your name and firm splattered all over the papers you crookAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-67309592489349198162012-01-07T10:17:19.663+00:002012-01-07T10:17:19.663+00:00I intend to seek an injunction preventing BBC Watc...I intend to seek an injunction preventing BBC Watchdog from further harassment and breaching data protection. Let's hope I get Tugenghat and close them down for good! After all, according to him, the truth is no defence.<br /><br />6 January 2012 06:29<br />===================================<br /><br />Presumably you will also pursue BBC Watchdog and Ms Robinson<br />bankrupting her in the process and seeking to gain control of the programme and her intellectual rights through the liquidator?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-16807298528568292562012-01-07T02:54:15.346+00:002012-01-07T02:54:15.346+00:00The following excerpt is taken from the Galloway G...The following excerpt is taken from the Galloway Gazette's article on the Forster Scandal....<br /><br />The Gazette reveals how the Law Society of Scotland ignored complaints about disgraced former solicitor John Kennedy Forster for NINE YEARS and only acted after our exclusive coverage of clients' misgivings.<br /><br />Forster was finally jailed for six and a half years for embezzling over £667,000 from client accounts even though The Law Society had told the Gazette as late as April 2000 that there were no aspects of the Forster case which required their intervention.<br /><br />But just two weeks later, after further revelations by The Gazette, The Law Society finally handed over the Forster case to the Crown Office for possible criminal proceedings.<br />One former client told the Gazette this week that he felt betrayed by The Law Society and felt that no action would have been taken had The Galloway Gazette not brought extensive publicity to the case.<br /><br />Positive Spin<br /><br />Yet despite this, the Law Society last week sought to put a positive spin on its eventual handling of the Forster case after the former solicitor was finally jailed in the High Court.<br />Its President, Joe Platt insisted that the Society always worked in the best interests of the public.<br /><br />He said: “This is an example of the Law Society doing its job well and taking every effort to ensure that the public are protected from any rogue solicitor.”<br /><br /><br />But Gazette Editor Peter Jeal said: “Far from demonstrating that The Law Society has ‘done it’s job well’ the Forster case has only served to highlight the need for an independent complaints authority to be set up.<br /><br />What is clear from this sorry tale is that The Law Society cannot possibly serve the interests of its members, solicitors, and the interests of the public at the same time."<br /><br />“On their own admission, they only started to take this case seriously in April 2000 after The Gazette highlighted client concerns which date as far back as 1991.<br />“We will be calling on the Justice Minister, Cathy Jamieson, to put in place an independent complaints authority to deal with complaints against solicitors.” <br /><br />Oh and Cathy Jamieson, well she wanted to close down Scotland Against Crooked Lawyers, some Justice Minister. The independent complaints authority she put in place is more bent than the Law Society of Scotland.LAW SOCIETY RADICAL EVILnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-17558016161892956202012-01-07T02:48:30.547+00:002012-01-07T02:48:30.547+00:00Those who are afraid of feedback on public forums,...Those who are afraid of feedback on public forums, are not fit to practice.<br /><br />TRUST NO LAWYER, I WAS RUINED TEN YEARS AGO AND I WILL STOP FIGHTING WHEN THE HUMAN CONDITION INTERVENES, WHEN I HAVE BREATHED MY LAST.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-54168732751496429642012-01-07T02:45:17.118+00:002012-01-07T02:45:17.118+00:00http://www.bentjudges.com/
MASTER POLICY RACKET F...http://www.bentjudges.com/<br /><br />MASTER POLICY RACKET FINALLY EXPOSED<br /><br />The University of Manchester's research confirms what everyone has known for years: that the Scottish Solicitors' Master Policy exists to protect lawyers - not clients. For years Mill, Platt and other senior members of Scotland's legal mafia have lied through their teeth by claiming that the Master Policy would cover clients in the event that their solicitor was negligent or dishonest. Note from the research document that both the Law Society and Marsh REFUSED to supply the researchers with any 'usable' master policy data. What a gang of cowards. So much for the Scottish legal profession's spirit of 'openness’ and ‘accountability'!<br /><br />Jesus Christ, how can any web site be a danger to the public, he is burying his head in the sand. Hudson Mill had to resign from the Law Society of Scotland as you know, take a reality check man.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-80170924968708799542012-01-07T02:41:07.831+00:002012-01-07T02:41:07.831+00:00“This website has served simply as a vehicle for p...“This website has served simply as a vehicle for pursuing personal grudges and vendettas against conscientious and reputable firms and legal professionals. No Hudson here is the proper statement;<br /><br />“These Law societies have served simply as a vehicle for pursuing personal grudges and vendettas against clients who have legitimate complaints by leaving them ruined, rightless outside the political community. The web sites are the only means clients have in 2012 for warning others and even if all postings on Solicitors from =Hell are true we shut is anyway". <br /><br />All you nice people out there, Hudson is a spin doctor and not a very good one. I would rather kiss a Black Mamba than trust a lawyer, at least the snake would kill me quickly, not torture me for life. <br /><br /><br /><br />I know I have complained to these mendacious lawyers.Your advice Hudson, shove itnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-53367026981838351432012-01-07T02:26:01.361+00:002012-01-07T02:26:01.361+00:00Where there is an office you can be sure the bums ...Where there is an office you can be sure the bums within will protect their bums outside to ruin you the client.<br /><br />The Law Societies policy, makes it impossible to identify culprits, so they can go on to ruin more clients. They don't want you reading web sites for a reason, the truth that the Law Societies are corrupt cover up specialists. They are a massive danger to consumers. You will not get Hudson even condemning those on BentJudges.com who like those on SFH are guilty. Lawyers never do anything wrong do they Hudson?Close the Law Societiesnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-25274174687975904082012-01-07T02:18:53.789+00:002012-01-07T02:18:53.789+00:00“This website has served simply as a vehicle for p...“This website has served simply as a vehicle for pursuing personal grudges and vendettas against conscientious and reputable firms and legal professionals. Far from being of any help to consumers, it has been a danger.<br />=================================<br />Okay Hudson, with your excellent legal mind explain to us how "the website is a danger to consumers". As we are touched by your concern for us please enlighten us what danger SFH is?<br /><br />Douglas Mill a man who was in your position in Scotland lied to the Justice 2 committee, he is on bentjudges.com as I am sure you know. He was protecting the Master Policy against a legitimate claim. Clearly Mill was a danger to consumers. Put it this way I have twelve years no claims bonus for safe driving. I would be shocked if you DID NOT GET A BONUS for killing off claims against claimants in England and Wales. <br /><br />You are full of the brown stuff Hudson, I would trust any client or web sites before I would trust a man like you. <br /><br />Mill was sorry not for killing off a legitimate claim, but for getting caught. To use a legal term I know a meeting of the minds with you is impossible, you believe your own spin but you do not fool us. Bentjudges.com these are the criminals who are a danger to the public, you are a biased man out of touch with reality. <br /><br />All you lawyers out there, people like Hudson are the problem not the solution.Who needs advice from Hudsonnoreply@blogger.com