tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post6781376517506729787..comments2024-03-24T23:01:57.640+00:00Comments on The Justice Diaries: CASHBACK QC: Legal regulator’s files reveal senior QC reduced claim without instructions, withheld key evidence & witnesses including Cabinet Secretary from Court of Session caseUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger14125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-32010027898887108452017-12-19T09:39:56.794+00:002017-12-19T09:39:56.794+00:00Great. very very informative and helpful post. I a...Great. very very informative and helpful post. I always found your blog very interesting. Thanks for sharing.Jonhttp://www.lochlaw.co.uk/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-18654022216279219762017-05-12T11:06:41.023+01:002017-05-12T11:06:41.023+01:00If we had any MSPs worth their salt this would be ...If we had any MSPs worth their salt this would be raised immediately on the floor of what passes for the scottish parliament.<br /><br />Some chance!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-51432817896339242572017-05-07T16:48:32.502+01:002017-05-07T16:48:32.502+01:00When is the next cover up due from the Faculty of ...When is the next cover up due from the Faculty of advocates?bunch of crooks the lot of them in their wigs!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-43709308933829340692017-05-06T22:03:38.077+01:002017-05-06T22:03:38.077+01:00Anonymous Anonymous said...
This case smacks of co...Anonymous Anonymous said...<br />This case smacks of coruption through and through why is the Lord President not intervening in this case and ordering a re investigation to<br />What happened here especially as Peter Watson now disgraced tempory sheriff was involved from the start.<br /><br />5 May 2017 at 17:45<br /><br />===========================================================================<br /><br />Because the Lord President is as bent as the rest of them thats why he got the job. Just think how many cases should he have recused himself from over the years. Why do you think he doesn't want a register of interests and is awkward with the parliament petition comity because he is an upstanding & honest person NO its because of his own years of corruption rigging cases to suit his own needs. <br /><br />Look at it this way do you really think they assess a case on its merits NO the common denominator is maximising the case in a way which will make them the most money because the merits mean nothing to them. And this behaviour begins when you first sit in front of your lawyer. MONEY MONEY MONEY Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-64184212188363951462017-05-06T18:33:15.400+01:002017-05-06T18:33:15.400+01:00and the same faculty claim Scotland has a world cl...and the same faculty claim Scotland has a world class legal system? world class corrupt legal system where every case is tainted by corruption strike off all who are involved in this case!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-5103299908356148672017-05-06T11:18:25.407+01:002017-05-06T11:18:25.407+01:00Drummond Miller, Simpson & Marwick (now Clyde ...Drummond Miller, Simpson & Marwick (now Clyde & Co)should immediately have their licenses revoked and prevented from undertaking any future legal work in Scotland and Advocate Craig Murray and John Campbell QC likewise disbarred from practice.<br /><br />The fact that Lord Woolman has done absolutely nothing to draw attention to these matters and the very serious concerns arising from them speaks volumes and shows just how the rot has spread throughout the legal profession - to say nothing of the politicians of all major parties who have known of this for decades and done NOTHING to remedy it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-89531272234698687292017-05-06T00:11:52.112+01:002017-05-06T00:11:52.112+01:00This is the problem with lawyers looking after the...This is the problem with lawyers looking after their own and here is a good example going right up to the judiciary!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-27492560476916660152017-05-05T17:45:10.082+01:002017-05-05T17:45:10.082+01:00This case smacks of coruption through and through ...This case smacks of coruption through and through why is the Lord President not intervening in this case and ordering a re investigation to<br />What happened here especially as Peter Watson now disgraced tempory sheriff was involved from the start.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-58244304466828424192017-05-05T13:50:39.366+01:002017-05-05T13:50:39.366+01:00also wanted to comment on what you say here
The F...also wanted to comment on what you say here<br /><br />The Faculty of Advocates have also refused to speak to the press on Mr Campbell’s actions and their previous investigation which it has since been confirmed relied on a second, highly edited version of written evidence given by fellow Advocate Craig Murray - which Murray now contests ever existed. <br /><br />so why is this allowed to happen and they get away with it?faculty of advocates must be completely corrupt to allow these things to go onAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-92194072428105734182017-05-05T13:46:30.093+01:002017-05-05T13:46:30.093+01:00He seems to be saying he can do as he pleases in h...He seems to be saying he can do as he pleases in his answers to the slcc so what is the point of having a client when the qc says bring client to court then dont bring client to court and qc does as he pleases anyway?<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-91945405542065977062017-05-05T02:09:56.319+01:002017-05-05T02:09:56.319+01:00"Serious questions remain as to why this evid..."Serious questions remain as to why this evidence relating to bribery was not introduced during the court case, and the motives of Mr Campbell in omitting such headline grabbing material from the court."<br /><br />As we say any dumb schmuck will realize you got more than one guy offered a bribe in this mess.<br /><br />Read thru your info this relates to dumping toxic trash right?do you guys have an Environmental Protection Agency? Check out how we do it https://www.epa.gov/enforcement/waste-chemical-and-cleanup-enforcementAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-85219027080803196962017-05-05T01:38:33.409+01:002017-05-05T01:38:33.409+01:00long past time someone started ripping court of se...long past time someone started ripping court of session opinions to shreds most of what comes out of the Edinburgh mafia's playground for weirdos is edited rubbish so not to piss off any big banks or lenders or the other creeps in business who rip people off keep up the good work!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-70740000223561956382017-05-04T23:37:17.360+01:002017-05-04T23:37:17.360+01:00Yes I know what it feels like, the old I was takin...Yes I know what it feels like, the old I was taking instruction from my client ploy. When I reported my lawyer & advocate to the Faculty of Fuckwits & the Law society & slcc, thats exactly what they both came away with, the advocate said she was taking instruction from me & the lawyer advised it was my case & they were also taking instruction from me. So get this guys at the time I knew nothing about the law and yet they all claim that it was me who was advising them of case merits and what direction they should take and how it was all my fault for it going wrong as it was my case and it was up to me what to do with it. <br /><br />There are all these wasters getting free this & free that through the courts & here we have a decent hard working couple being treated like this its a disgrace man.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-27315467371134823382017-05-04T23:03:29.940+01:002017-05-04T23:03:29.940+01:00There may well be a case for striking off the QC, ...There may well be a case for striking off the QC, his regulator and the judge all at the same time given what happened in court and to the complaint.I am curious as to why this John Campbell did not answer questions or publish any record of his client telling him to drop the claim.From his letter to the slcc and the who said what to who one can only assume no such instruction was given.The opinion by the judge.Who wrote it for him?Opposing counsel?Anyone out there currently in front of Lord Woolman feel they are in for a fair hearing? if so I'd say they have real problems.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com