tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post6268111970851447679..comments2024-03-24T23:01:57.640+00:00Comments on The Justice Diaries: SILENCE IN COURT : Scotland’s top judge Lord Gill summoned to Parliament over ‘vested interests’ attempt to block Register of Judicial Interests petitionUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger121125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-73619552942129604542014-11-27T19:15:26.359+00:002014-11-27T19:15:26.359+00:00How can a judge get away with not going to a parli...How can a judge get away with not going to a parliament when anyone not going to a court is found in contempt and jailed.<br /><br />This Lord Gill must resign.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-29136638895648052122013-03-27T19:40:35.665+00:002013-03-27T19:40:35.665+00:00For a Chief justice to come up with excuses like t...For a Chief justice to come up with excuses like these because of your petition is pretty lame.It is now obvious there is too much to hide in Scotland's Banana Republic justice system.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-48404906241131511332013-03-26T22:10:14.504+00:002013-03-26T22:10:14.504+00:00Anonymous said...
Why don't all cases in Scotl...<br /> Anonymous said...<br />Why don't all cases in Scotland's courts be decided on the pull of a Christmas cracker?<br /><br />That way, the victimised party in the case would get a statistically better chance of success and it would have the following further benefits:?<br /><br />a) It would be a fairer system than the current one?<br /><br />b) It would be vastly cheaper for the victim and would effectively do away with corrupt Scottish lawyers who couldn't give a hoot for their client's case and who are only motivated by enriching themselves in free cash?<br /><br />c) The case would be dealt with quickly with no built-in delays possible?<br /><br />d) There would be no case backlogs within the court system?<br /><br />e) We could therefore employ less judges on a reduced salary?<br /><br />f) The rigging of cases would cease?<br /><br />g) The Law Society of Scotland, the SSDT & the SLCC would be put out of business?<br /><br />h) All that the victims could potentially lose is money, they would be left with their health and soul intact?<br /><br />i) There would be plenty of new burger flippers looking for a minimum wage job.<br /><br /><br />This way, everybody wins and the only lot losing are the vested interest Scottish lawyers et al?<br /><br />24 March 2013 02:00<br />£££££££££££££££££££££££<br /><br />In actual fact this idea really has merit.<br /><br />At least it would be an improvement on the Banana Split status quo?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-73327236581613882922013-03-26T16:19:21.961+00:002013-03-26T16:19:21.961+00:00I know what is under discussion is the propriety o...I know what is under discussion is the propriety of Scottish Judges?<br /><br />Tell me, is it normal, when your case is called for the 1st time before a judge and you have never been before a judge before (he does not know you - other than the Law Society has whispered in his ear to deliberately blacken your character) but as the judge enters the court room he starts shouting at you and telling you that you have not complied with the court all the way to his bench and then slams all of his papers on his desk, whilst his eyes are virtually popping out of his head and the veins in his kneck are sticking out.......?<br /><br />Is this normal?<br /><br />Then when the Clerk of the court tells the Judge that You have complied completely with the requirements of the court, that the judge is out of order but he doesn't apologise for his unfair and rediculous outburst but instead continues to fume and scowl at you?<br /><br />Is this normal in Scotland's courts?<br /><br />Then when you are giving your evidence, the judge repeatedly interrupts you and tells you that you cannot say 'that' in his court room even if it is true and that instead you have to agree with his 'version' even if it is false and misleading and untrue?<br /><br />Is this normal in Scotland and is this what is called 'JUSTICE' in Scotland?<br /><br />Then when the opposite side admit that they are wrong and that you are right and have told the truth, that the judge then finds in favour of Your opposition and in doing so, he completely disregards the main body of your testimony and instead portrays a position that was the false legal standpoint of the Law Society of Scotland in order that a miscarriage of justice could be perpetrated?<br /><br />I despair!<br /><br />If this is common practise then Scotland IS a Banana Republic after all run by crooks and spivs who pay absolutely no regard for the law and instead carry on as if this is the American Wild West where they can simply use the law for their own selfish and corrupt whims?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-2287025630789948442013-03-26T11:14:30.294+00:002013-03-26T11:14:30.294+00:00Anonymous said...
Why don't all cases in Scotl...<br /> Anonymous said...<br />Why don't all cases in Scotland's courts be decided on the pull of a Christmas cracker?<br /><br />That way, the victimised party in the case would get a statistically better chance of success and it would have the following further benefits:?<br /><br />a) It would be a fairer system than the current one?<br /><br />b) It would be vastly cheaper for the victim and would effectively do away with corrupt Scottish lawyers who couldn't give a hoot for their client's case and who are only motivated by enriching themselves in free cash?<br /><br />c) The case would be dealt with quickly with no built-in delays possible?<br /><br />d) There would be no case backlogs within the court system?<br /><br />e) We could therefore employ less judges on a reduced salary?<br /><br />f) The rigging of cases would cease?<br /><br />g) The Law Society of Scotland, the SSDT & the SLCC would be put out of business?<br /><br />h) All that the victims could potentially lose is money, they would be left with their health and soul intact?<br /><br />i) There would be plenty of new burger flippers looking for a minimum wage job.<br /><br /><br />This way, everybody wins and the only lot losing are the vested interest Scottish lawyers et al?<br /><br />24 March 2013 02:00<br />------------------------------—<br /><br />Great, the end of CASH TREES?<br /><br />I'll start the mass-manufacturing of the Christmas crackers now.....<br /><br />Inside each cracker will be a pair of novelty paper hats with £uck Scottish lawyers on it along with two vouchers for a £30 value for a bottle of champagne to be redeemed at all major supermarket chains. So that the winner gets to celebrate winning and the loser can celebrate the downfall of crooked Scottish lawyers and can drown their sorrows at the same time?<br /><br />What a perfect system?<br /><br /><br /><br />Dr Who?<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-16733459214872774522013-03-24T02:00:58.592+00:002013-03-24T02:00:58.592+00:00Why don't all cases in Scotland's courts b...Why don't all cases in Scotland's courts be decided on the pull of a Christmas cracker?<br /><br />That way, the victimised party in the case would get a statistically better chance of success and it would have the following further benefits:?<br /><br />a) It would be a fairer system than the current one?<br /><br />b) It would be vastly cheaper for the victim and would effectively do away with corrupt Scottish lawyers who couldn't give a hoot for their client's case and who are only motivated by enriching themselves in free cash?<br /><br />c) The case would be dealt with quickly with no built-in delays possible?<br /><br />d) There would be no case backlogs within the court system?<br /><br />e) We could therefore employ less judges on a reduced salary?<br /><br />f) The rigging of cases would cease?<br /><br />g) The Law Society of Scotland, the SSDT & the SLCC would be put out of business?<br /><br />h) All that the victims could potentially lose is money, they would be left with their health and soul intact?<br /><br />i) There would be plenty of new burger flippers looking for a minimum wage job.<br /><br /><br />This way, everybody wins and the only lot losing are the vested interest Scottish lawyers et al?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-29574739045956267172013-03-24T01:45:59.585+00:002013-03-24T01:45:59.585+00:00This is shocking!
I thought that the judges had t...This is shocking!<br /><br />I thought that the judges had to do this already?<br /><br />Otherwise, how can we tell if they are acting properly or not after all, we've had corrupt cardinals, priests, journalists, police, the BBC, MSPs, MPs, the Crown Office, the Law Society of Scotland, the SSDT & the SLCC caught out lying in recent months, so the judges cannot expect the Scottish Public to believe that any other civil servant is somehow different, when so many of our supposed trusted pillars of society in Scotland are utterly corrupt and rotten to the core?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-3871036915549567332013-03-22T11:40:49.621+00:002013-03-22T11:40:49.621+00:00This kind of thing could only happen in Scotland?
...This kind of thing could only happen in Scotland?<br /><br />Totally corrupt?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-66705355454072333422013-03-22T11:29:14.624+00:002013-03-22T11:29:14.624+00:00Anonymous said...
William Penn (1644-1718) Helps E... Anonymous said...<br />William Penn (1644-1718) Helps Establish the Right to a Jury Trial<br /><br />In the United States prisoners enjoy the right to trial by a jury if they choose it. On paper, William Penn also had that right. In actuality, the Stuart government bullied or tampered with juries to force them to return verdicts pleasing to its officials. (JUST LIKE THE LAW SOCIETY RIGG COMPLAINTS AGAINST CLIENTS) When Penn and William Mead were arrested in 1670 for preaching, the mayor and magistrate attempted to coerce their jury. (THE MODERN LAWYER DOES NOT GET ARRESTED BECAUSE THE COMPLAINT ABOUT HIM IS KEPT IN HOUSE) In the end, Penn and Mead prevailed on the sturdy jury to stand with them, and a higher court ruled that magistrates might no longer coerce juries. (AND NEITHER CAN LORD GILL EXPECT THE PUBLIC TO TRUST LAWYERS) Penn had helped establish a major civil right for accused prisoners in English-speaking lands. (BUT IN THE 21st CENTURY YOU DON'T HAVE THE RIGHT TO KNOW IF A JUDGE HAS A CRIMINAL RECORD, BENEFIT FRAUDSTER, AND THEY TRY TO AVOID SCRUTINY BY CLAIMING THEY WILL BE HARASSED BY PARTY LITIGANTS AND THE MEDIA. AND EXCUSE TO HIDE THEIR SECRET PECUNIARY INTERESTS AND CONFLICT OF INTERESTS.<br /><br />19 March 2013 14:23<br />^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br /><br />Scottish Legal Apartheid in action?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-59251641223235868382013-03-21T20:29:03.614+00:002013-03-21T20:29:03.614+00:00A magistrate claimed £22,500 in disability benefit...A magistrate claimed £22,500 in disability benefits but was filmed trying downhill grass skiing during a Channel 4 TV show, a court has heard.<br /><br />Wayne Middleton, 48, also abseiled down a 150ft tower and took part in stilt walking when he appeared on Coach Trip in 2011.<br /><br />North Somerset Magistrates Court also heard he took up salsa dancing as a hobby and continued to teach despite having told the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) he was 'unable to walk without being in severe pain'.<br /><br />Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2297027/Magistrate-48-appeared-C4-Coach-Trip-stole-22-500-disability-benefits-working-salsa-instructor.html#ixzz2OCy3OvwQ<br />Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on FacebookAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-45897103161882441772013-03-21T19:04:53.900+00:002013-03-21T19:04:53.900+00:00The thing about democracy is that power is meant t...The thing about democracy is that power is meant to be in the hands of the people. But this is easily bypassed by bureaucracy so that for example a lawyer ruins you and you stay ruined because there is no separation of powers. You collectively can remove a corrupt MP, or MSP, you cannot remove lawyer power because they are judge and juries of themselves. <br /><br />Even in a democracy if all those elected to parliament share the same view on Law Society power [maintaining self regulation} domination is the result. Tell all of your friends what this blog is exposing. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-29712319890959724572013-03-21T13:28:06.230+00:002013-03-21T13:28:06.230+00:00Lord Gill the dictionary definition of an oath. A ...Lord Gill the dictionary definition of an oath. A solemn appeal to witness one's determination to speak the truth, to keep a promise, etc.<br />----------------------------------<br />Just words the judicial oath is a promise. With the track record of your profession we have much proof that you are a confederacy of deceivers whose real aim is to dominate the public for your vested interests. No power judges the Judges. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-74545329192166863052013-03-21T11:59:39.514+00:002013-03-21T11:59:39.514+00:00Try posting comments on online newspapers about th...Try posting comments on online newspapers about the Register of Interests for Judges and see how free the press are. They never publish them. Most of them are in the pocket of The Law Societies of the United Kingdom. The Lawyers control everything apart from DOI, other internet blogs and The Sunday Mail. It is not Law Society domination, they have their agents throughout the so called free press. You would think it was Stalinist Russia the way this Law Society control everything. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-75523072616663847692013-03-21T00:46:22.936+00:002013-03-21T00:46:22.936+00:00Anonymous said...
No mystery why the rest of ...Anonymous said...<br /><br /> No mystery why the rest of the press 'failed' to pick up on this. It was down to the Law Society phoning round to make it clear "coverage is not desirable".<br /><br /> 20 March 2013 15:55<br /><br />Ah.Nice to know the Law Society are still clamping down on any news that portrays them in a less than desirable light.<br /><br />Shame on all those who acquiesce to such blatant corruption.No wonder you have a judge who feels omnipotent enough to write in such vile terms to elected politicians just because someone suggested a register of interests should be brought in for the judiciary.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-84654055790394728812013-03-20T23:49:52.999+00:002013-03-20T23:49:52.999+00:00And who is responsible for 'punishing' the...And who is responsible for 'punishing' the judges who might somehow, by chance, have been discovered to break their 'oath'? <br /><br />Why the Lord President of course - the same person who may very well have appointed the transgresor - hardly a ringing endorsement of either's character or judgement if it ever came to light.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-16844536340203403192013-03-20T20:53:27.766+00:002013-03-20T20:53:27.766+00:00Oaths are bullshit, a promise nothing else. There ...Oaths are bullshit, a promise nothing else. There is a world of difference between an oath and proof. Judges say they have to do the right thing by the oaths they take, that does not mean they do.<br /><br />Oaths are bullshit. In his book Leviathan Thomas Hobbes wrote "covenants without the sword are covenants". Similarly oaths without proof are oaths. The latter mean nothing. Just an oaf taking an oath. No proof that Judges do what is right and moral. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-81971287138345167442013-03-20T17:46:54.210+00:002013-03-20T17:46:54.210+00:00Ironically there is a case currently in the Court ...Ironically there is a case currently in the Court of Session where the judge has been told to recuse himself but has refused to do so.I understand several people at high level know about this yet nothing has been done to ensure the parties receive a fair hearing with a different judge.Your register of interests could make all the difference in cases like these.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-42364329958188529052013-03-20T15:55:35.561+00:002013-03-20T15:55:35.561+00:00No mystery why the rest of the press 'failed&#...No mystery why the rest of the press 'failed' to pick up on this. It was down to the Law Society phoning round to make it clear "coverage is not desirable".<br />Anyway don't moan folks,the story did well in the Sunday Mail and as someone said to me yesterday it far is better a story like this being in a newspaper people actually buy and read than one selling to a select audience and so-called 'professions' who are causing all the problems in the first place. Keep up the good work all.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-53335488016820977122013-03-19T23:41:28.602+00:002013-03-19T23:41:28.602+00:00What kind of role model does the antics of The Lor...What kind of role model does the antics of The Lord President portray?<br /><br />Why do we have to be satisfied with 'no bad' in Scotland when we should be striving for magnificent, fantastic, amazing and greatness?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-66901799994992370232013-03-19T23:30:26.547+00:002013-03-19T23:30:26.547+00:00How is it possible for Scottish judges to be found...How is it possible for Scottish judges to be found guilty and for nobody to know about it?<br /><br />We're they convicted in a SECRET court?<br /><br />What action did The Lord Advocate take to report these convicts to The Lord President?<br /><br />How can it be possible for ZERO press to report on these crimes by the judiciary when they were convicted?<br /><br />Was the Scottish Press served with a 'D' Notice and threatened NOT to bring this to the attention of the Scottish People?<br /><br />Why no intervention by the Justice Secretary & or the First Minister to protect the Scottish People from these usurpers?<br /><br />How much money has been erroneously been paid out to these judges as a salary, when they have been in default and so have made themselves ineligible?<br /><br />How many cases have these convicted Scottish judges presided over when ineligible to do so and now which require to be annulled, compensation paid and possibly retried?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-41422927838145444492013-03-19T23:16:15.276+00:002013-03-19T23:16:15.276+00:00What percentage of Scottish Judges have a criminal...What percentage of Scottish Judges have a criminal record?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-3379216314171796132013-03-19T19:45:29.729+00:002013-03-19T19:45:29.729+00:00Oh yes politicians get jailed from time to time fo...Oh yes politicians get jailed from time to time for perverting the course of justice. While lawyers and Judges judge the politicians no one judges the Judges and their lawyers, the secretive Crown Office, Law Society and SLCC deal with complaints in house so the create a perception of a complaints system. The Judges are at the top of the tree, no one except them are their to police their activities. hence Judges with criminal records overseeing court proceedings and covering up their vested interests. And old Lord Gill I assume he appoints judges now he has the top job. It is all a closed shop where they look after their Masonic brotherhood and cover each others backs from scandals. Hardly what the rational person could call a justice system. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-7804835102895433642013-03-19T14:23:52.654+00:002013-03-19T14:23:52.654+00:00William Penn (1644-1718) Helps Establish the Right...William Penn (1644-1718) Helps Establish the Right to a Jury Trial<br /><br />In the United States prisoners enjoy the right to trial by a jury if they choose it. On paper, William Penn also had that right. In actuality, the Stuart government bullied or tampered with juries to force them to return verdicts pleasing to its officials. (JUST LIKE THE LAW SOCIETY RIGG COMPLAINTS AGAINST CLIENTS) When Penn and William Mead were arrested in 1670 for preaching, the mayor and magistrate attempted to coerce their jury. (THE MODERN LAWYER DOES NOT GET ARRESTED BECAUSE THE COMPLAINT ABOUT HIM IS KEPT IN HOUSE) In the end, Penn and Mead prevailed on the sturdy jury to stand with them, and a higher court ruled that magistrates might no longer coerce juries. (AND NEITHER CAN LORD GILL EXPECT THE PUBLIC TO TRUST LAWYERS) Penn had helped establish a major civil right for accused prisoners in English-speaking lands. (BUT IN THE 21st CENTURY YOU DON'T HAVE THE RIGHT TO KNOW IF A JUDGE HAS A CRIMINAL RECORD, BENEFIT FRAUDSTER, AND THEY TRY TO AVOID SCRUTINY BY CLAIMING THEY WILL BE HARASSED BY PARTY LITIGANTS AND THE MEDIA. AND EXCUSE TO HIDE THEIR SECRET PECUNIARY INTERESTS AND CONFLICT OF INTERESTS.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-42766747411395601002013-03-19T14:05:38.310+00:002013-03-19T14:05:38.310+00:00Who cares?
The important thing is one paper is co...Who cares?<br /><br />The important thing is one paper is covering it and it is here for all time so anyone who needs to refer to it or who is worried about the justice system can come and see exactly what is going on!<br /><br />Anyway to be honest I stopped buying newspapers ages ago and dont bother with bbc news because it covers everywhere else on the planet except Scotland.But because of these kinds of stories I started buying the Sunday Mail so am quite happy thanks and it seems to get a better coverage there than any of the other rags dare or care doing!<br /><br />18 March 2013 18:25<br /><br />feel the same here and swapped the Sunday hootsmon for the Sunday Mail<br /><br />funny I bet Gill did the same this weekend hahahahaAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-2403915107978418752013-03-19T13:02:59.594+00:002013-03-19T13:02:59.594+00:00Ever since Lockerbie and before a lot of our judge...Ever since Lockerbie and before a lot of our judges have been at it in one way or another.Now its time to see what has really been going on behind the scenes and it must be so big the judge reacted so badly when suggested he declare his interests..Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com