tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post3274687206948987954..comments2024-03-24T23:01:57.640+00:00Comments on The Justice Diaries: Law Society ‘puppet’ tribunal allows crooked lawyer to remain in practice as fraud levels soar in Scots legal professionUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger51125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-11783446570429523182009-05-04T17:36:00.000+01:002009-05-04T17:36:00.000+01:00much like over at the RNLI wouldn't you say ?much like over at the RNLI wouldn't you say ?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-80821972364936302532009-04-28T16:16:00.000+01:002009-04-28T16:16:00.000+01:00I made a complaint against my solicitor and the sa...I made a complaint against my solicitor and the same thing happened.The committee recommended prosecution at the ssdt and it was stopped after the crook sent them a letter.The Law Society gave me no explanation about it and the ssdt threatened me if I wrote again asking what happened.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-58473187412626197602009-04-24T10:15:00.000+01:002009-04-24T10:15:00.000+01:00The problem for patients is that they are brought ...The problem for patients is that they are brought up to trust doctors. Like lawyers, medics have a cover up culture and it could be argued this undermines the trust patients have in doctors. One GP actually reported Shipman (She cared about patients and her practice), over the number of deaths he had, but she was warned about damaging his reputation. In the face of such a culture, patients should know if doctors have been reported to Primary Care so they can make an informed choice. Shipman was taking drugs and had stockpiled them. When he was caught the partners threw him out of the practice. This is when his future patients should have been informed, ruining this monsters career would have saved countless lives. But no, he was allowed to be rehabilitated? and future patients kept in the dark, just like the General Medical Council did with the rapist above. So this culture of coverup is the factor that allowed this evil man to continue perpetrating his crimes against the most vulnerable in our society. A doctor's reputation and career are what is important to the medics. Like lawyers, complaints against the medical profession are ignored, and this case highlights the fatal consequences of that culture. Primare Care managers are coverup managers. Going to a doctor is a necessary part of life, but the culture of coverup makes me wonder how honest your average doctor is?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-58319773533690859852009-04-23T15:43:00.000+01:002009-04-23T15:43:00.000+01:00BBC News Story.
Sexual assault doctor struck off ...BBC News Story.<br /><br />Sexual assault doctor struck off <br /> <br />Crosby was jailed for five years in March this year <br />A Merseyside GP, jailed for indecently assaulting female patients who went to him with gynaecological problems, has been struck off. <br />The General Medical Council (GMC) told Stephen Crosby that his examinations were invasive, indecent and went beyond what was medically justified. <br /><br />In March, Liverpool Crown Court heard how the father of seven, assaulted seven patients over a 21-year period. <br /><br />Mr Crosby is currently serving a five year jail term. <br /><br />Hotline set up <br /><br />He was also ordered to sign on the Sex Offenders Register for life. <br /><br />The offences at the Village Surgery in Formby came to light in 2002 when Crosby had to admit to Southport and Formby Primary Care Trust he had been given a police caution for indecent exposure. <br /><br />A hotline was set up and a letter sent out to female patients some of whom had made sexual allegations against the GP. <br /><br />He was suspended in October 2002 and was originally charged with 26 separate sex attacks on women patients. <br /><br />Crosby - who denied the offences - was convicted of seven and cleared of five. The remaining 14 counts were ordered to lie on the file. <br /><br />(Another shocking case.)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-39882875654536689962009-04-23T15:29:00.000+01:002009-04-23T15:29:00.000+01:00PATIENTS NEED GREATER PROTECTION
A rogue doctor c...PATIENTS NEED GREATER PROTECTION<br /><br />A rogue doctor could still get away with murder despite a shake-up of the coroner's system designed to deter another serial killer like GP Harold Shipman, according to the judge who led the inquiry into his crimes. <br /><br /><br />The Shipman Inquiry concluded nearly five years ago that loopholes in the coroner's system had allowed the family doctor from Hyde, near Manchester, to cover his tracks by signing death certificates himself, avoiding the involvement of a coroner. <br /><br />It found Shipman murdered at least 215 victims by giving lethal morphine injections, during a killing spree lasting from 1975 to 1998. (How do you detect the silent killer?)<br /><br />He was convicted in January 2000 of murdering 15 of his patients and jailed for life but died after being found hanging by his bedsheets in his cell at Wakefield Prison in 2004. <br /><br />Dame Janet Smith, who chaired the inquiry, told the BBC she was concerned about the lack of progress in implementing her recommendations on tightening up the way deaths are recorded. <br /><br />She said until the details of reforms to death certification are published, it is difficult to see how the system could prevent another "dishonest" and "malevolent" doctor getting away with murder. <br /><br />"I really was shocked to find how totally our system of death certification is dependent upon the honesty and integrity of a single doctor." (Very dangerous).<br /><br />She added: "Once you realise that you can have a dishonest doctor and a malevolent doctor, then it is obvious that under our system that doctor can get away with murder." <br /><br />However, Justice Minister Bridget Prentice told the programme she was confident the "possibility of something as horrific as Shipman will have very, very little chance of happening again". (Brave thing to say).<br /><br />"There will be this need to have two doctors examining certificates, there will be the opportunity for families to query what's on the death certificate," she said. <br /><br />"I think a number of aspects like that will make sure that we don't see another Shipman." <br /><br />The Coroners and Justice Bill was published in January - nearly five years after the Shipman Inquiry ended. <br /><br />Under the proposed reforms to the coroner's system, a second doctor will be required to review deaths which have not been referred to a coroner. <br /><br />The Government also proposed changes to cremation procedures to allow families to inspect the medical forms of deceased relatives so they will be able to draw the medical referee's attention to any concerns about unexpected symptoms or discrepancies in the case. <br /><br />The regulations were introduced as an interim measure and precede longer-term Department of Health plans to create the role of a Medical Examiner, who will deal with all deaths. <br /><br />("Shipman thought he was doing nothing wrong. His attitude to investigating officers "How dare you question me, I am a medical practitioner"). A patronizing murderer indeed. If ever a reason existed for patients to know about complaints against their GP, this case is it. This article was in the press, comments in brackets are by the respondent).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-32274635981829343782009-04-23T13:20:00.000+01:002009-04-23T13:20:00.000+01:00Law Society client intimidation :
Waterboarding: ...Law Society client intimidation :<br /><br />Waterboarding: Aimed at simulating sensation of drowning. Used on clients who claim or complain against crooked lawyers<br /><br />Insect: Deadly insect to be placed with client in 'confinement box', client to be told the insect would sting. Used on clients who dont pay their overcharged faked up legal bills<br /><br />Walling: Client slammed repeatedly into false wall to create sound and shock. Used on people who expose the Scottish Legal Complaints Commission as a bunch of crooks.<br /><br />Sleep deprivation: Client shackled standing up while Law Society staff take turns to whip them. Used often on clients who don't take to Law Society whitewashes, once for 180 hoursAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-65759286517345296362009-04-23T11:41:00.000+01:002009-04-23T11:41:00.000+01:00Six offences committed by Rowlands between August ...Six offences committed by Rowlands between August 2004 and June 2006 -two assaults, three breaches of the peace and a breach of bail conditions - were considered “matters of serious concern“ by the GMC.<br /><br />-----------------------------------<br /><br />The General Medical Council are correct about Dr Rowlands. <br /><br />Donal MacIntyre's website showed they allowed a convicted rapist who was a Gynaecologist back to work and did not tell his patients. What is going on here, women are being examined by this consultant and he was jailed for raping a patient. Clearly a convicted rapist treating patients is not a matter of serious concern for the General Medical Council, although Dr Rowlands violence is. I am not defending Dr Rowlands, but surely there are warped people in the GMC if they allow a rapist back to work.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-28592638662172006312009-04-23T01:07:00.000+01:002009-04-23T01:07:00.000+01:00Paedophile doctor caught in Derbyshire, other doct...Paedophile doctor caught in Derbyshire, other doctor beats up wife and assaults new partners husband, doctors distorting medical records, mass serial killer doctor, doctors making money through corrupt organ scams overseas, doctor on sex charge, the theft of childrens organs at Alder Hay, Bristol heart scandal, doctors helping insurance companies to avoid compensating victims of asbestos exposure, doctors covering up injuries in litigation cases, employers employing doctors to avoid litigation cases, there must be some good ones?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-77095163991558769432009-04-22T21:46:00.000+01:002009-04-22T21:46:00.000+01:00THE HAMILTON ADVERTISER
Insurers challenge asbest...THE HAMILTON ADVERTISER<br /><br />Insurers challenge asbestos ruling<br />Apr 21 2009 <br /><br />Insurers have launched a last ditch challenge against a law giving victims of negligent exposure to asbestos the power to seek damages in Scotland.<br /><br />The industry argues that the law contravenes the European Convention on Human Rights and insurers' economic rights.<br /><br />The decision by MSPs last month overturned a landmark House of Lords ruling that people with pleural plaques - a symptomless thickening of lung membranes - cannot claim compensation<br /><br />I noticed this in the paper this week Mr Cherbi, the industry argues that the law contravenes the European Convention on Human Rights and insurers' economic rights. <br />How pathetic these lawyers are they would do anything for money, filthy morals.<br />Other lawyers wanted to use the human rights act to allow them to continue, investigating complaints against their own profession.<br />Clearly they are not interested in the human rights of asbestos victims or lawyers clients. The asbestos victims must be compensated at all costs.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-13103900508868437612009-04-22T20:59:00.000+01:002009-04-22T20:59:00.000+01:00Rowlands’ lawyer had told Hamilton Sheriff Court h...Rowlands’ lawyer had told Hamilton Sheriff Court his client suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder after attending the scene of a helicopter crash in Shetland.<br /><br />(AGAIN WE SEE A PROFESSIONAL IN TROUBLE HAS SOME CONDITION), MENTAL ILLNESS? WHO WILL DIAGNOSE IT, A DOCTOR OF COURSE.<br /><br />Prior to the fine being imposed solicitor Gerry Devanney told Sheriff John Stewart that Rowlands had been offered a four-month contract at the A&E department of Bristol Royal Infirmary. It later emerged there had been no formal job offer and the GP did not take up the post.<br /><br />(WAS THE SOLICITOR LIED TO ABOUT THE JOB IN BRISTOL OR IS THE SOLICITOR TELLING LIES?)<br /><br />Doctors have no mental illness when they are treating patients. I know one (not Mr Rowlands) who fabricates patients mental illness when he is in a difficult legal position.<br /><br />At lease Mr Scullion did not say he was mentally ill, that age old lawyer trick.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-90133794992662626022009-04-22T19:01:00.000+01:002009-04-22T19:01:00.000+01:00HAMILTON ADVERTISER
Lawyer banned for drink-drivi...HAMILTON ADVERTISER<br /><br />Lawyer banned for drink-driving<br />Jan 8 2009 <br /><br />A HAMILTON lawyer was last week banned from the road after admitting a drink-driving charge.<br /><br />Nicholas Scullion snr was also fined £400 at Hamilton Sheriff Court, where he regularly appears to defend clients.<br /><br />Scullion was stopped by police in Motherwell while driving his Jaguar in September.<br /><br />He had been slightly over the limit – a blood test had found he had an alcohol count of 91mg. The limit is 80mg.<br /><br />Nicholas J Scullion and Co run the website roadtrafficdefence.com with the slogan Saving Your Licence.<br /><br />It claims that the firm specialise in drink driving, speeding, careless and dangerous driving offences.<br /><br />Colleagues were said to be stunned when they saw the 61-year-old lawyer in the dock at the end of a day’s business last week.<br /><br />Scullion, of Bothwell, had slipped into Hamilton Sheriff Court by the back door and was represented by his son, Nicholas jnr.<br /><br />A sheriff from another area had been brought in to deal with the matter.<br /><br />A legal source said: “He was the very last case in court, but no one knew about it. Those still in court were shocked.<br /><br />“He must be embarrassed by the whole thing – especially since the firm specialise in driving offences.”<br /><br />The firm, which earlier this year moved into new premises in Cadzow Street, boast about their expertise in helping motorists.<br /><br />Their website states: “It is often thought that there are no defences to a charge of driving with excess alcohol or failing to provide a specimen.<br /><br />“There are loopholes that can be exploited to help you avoid disqualification.”<br /><br />Sheriff Maggie Neilson imposed the fine and disqualified him from driving for a year. His licence was also endorsed.<br /><br />The Campaign Against Drink Driving described Scullion’s 12-month driving ban as “lenient.”Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-27361913704291919182009-04-22T18:35:00.000+01:002009-04-22T18:35:00.000+01:00AN ATRICLE ABOUT A DOCTOR, LOOK INTO THIS ONE MR C...AN ATRICLE ABOUT A DOCTOR, LOOK INTO THIS ONE MR CHERBI.<br /><br />Disgraced Bothwell GP is facing serious sex allegation<br />Apr 9 2009 by Alastair McNeill, Hamilton Advertiser <br /><br />A DISGRACED Lanarkshire GP who beat up his wife is facing a ‘serious sex allegation’.<br /><br />Police have passed to the procurator fiscal a report containing claims Dr Christopher Rowlands carried out a sexual assault.<br /><br />A Strathclyde Police spokesman this week confirmed that officers had investigated Rowlands and matters had been referred to the procurator fiscal.<br /><br />She said: “A report on the circumstances of the allegations has been submitted to the procurator fiscal in Hamilton.<br /><br />“However, no warrant has been issued for Dr Rowlands’ arrest.”<br /><br />A police source confirmed that the complaint against the doctor was of a “serious sexual nature”.<br /><br />A spokesman for Hamilton procurator fiscal said they had received a report on a 53-year-old man and the matter was under consideration.<br /><br />In 2004, Rowlands was convicted of battering wife Anne-Marie at their family home in Bothwell and was fined £1100 for the offence.<br /><br />Rowlands had repeatedly punched his wife on the head and body, dragged her across the floor and stamped on her head to her injury.<br /><br />He left Blantyre’s Rowallan Medical Group early in 2004 on health grounds, and later left Mrs Rowlands for hairdresser Patricia Freeman who walked out on her husband David.<br /><br />Rowlands went on to commit further offences including an assault on Patricia Freeman’s husband with a set of keys. He was barred from practising after a General Medical Council Fitness to Practise Panel concluded Rowlands’ ability to work had been impaired due to his criminal record.<br /><br />The suspension was due to be reviewed at the end of the month.<br /><br />Six offences committed by Rowlands between August 2004 and June 2006 - two assaults, three breaches of the peace and a breach of bail conditions - were considered “matters of serious concern“ by the GMC.<br /><br />Rowlands’ lawyer had told Hamilton Sheriff Court his client suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder after attending the scene of a helicopter crash in Shetland.<br /><br />Prior to the fine being imposed solicitor Gerry Devanney told Sheriff John Stewart that Rowlands had been offered a four-month contract at the A&E department of Bristol Royal Infirmary. It later emerged there had been no formal job offer and the GP did not take up the post.<br /><br />The GMC website states the Fitness to Practise Panel is scheduled to review Rowlands’ case, of impairment by reason of a conviction or caution, between April 30 and May 1.<br /><br />“The panel will review the case of Dr Rowlands whose registration is suspended by virtue of a determination of the Fitness to Practise Panel in August 2008,” the GMC website adds.<br /><br />“The original conviction, from August 2004, concerned assault and breach of the peace.”<br /><br />CHRIS ROWLANDS: report of allegations sent to the procurator fiscal.<br /><br /><br />IT WILL BE INTERESTING TO SEE THE OUTCOME OF THIS CASE?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-19812754477672995492009-04-22T17:21:00.000+01:002009-04-22T17:21:00.000+01:00Lawyers can never be allowed to regulate themselve...Lawyers can never be allowed to regulate themselves and as you say it must come to an end.How do we go about it Peter ? I want to do soemthing on this to helpAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-69005415995972548992009-04-22T17:06:00.000+01:002009-04-22T17:06:00.000+01:00Peter. As a solicitor let me just say I absolutely...Peter. As a solicitor let me just say I absolutely cant stand clients at all and from what I see of John's case they got what they deserved.<br /><br />-----------------------------------<br /><br />This fool has shown he hates clients, loves lawyers, and lacks the impartiallity necessary to investigate complaints. <br />If John O'Donnell had treated the idiot who wrote the above statement the way O'Donnell treated his victims, that idiot would want O'Donnell hung, drawn, and quartered. We are dealing with chronic hypocrytes, and this disease runs through every law office. Lawyers are full of toxic venom, and hate those who go against their profession. This lawyer has shown what we all know, they will shake your hand at the first meeting, GET YOU TO FILL IN THE LEGAL AID FORMS) AND STAB YOU IN THE BACK. Not a very intelligent person in my view.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-75821331384269924552009-04-22T16:42:00.000+01:002009-04-22T16:42:00.000+01:00Good Evening Mr Cherbi,
Today I have been printin...Good Evening Mr Cherbi,<br /><br />Today I have been printing some your articles and giving them to my friends, who are most interested. I have also advised them to visit Mr Ushers site Scotland Against Crooked Lawyers. <br /><br />Lawyers a little test for you. The lawyer who left the message stating he could not stand clients, and John O'Donnells victims deserve what they got, if you know his name, tell us, someone must work with him? Only a fool would state he cannot stand clients, he could be a lawyer anywhere so without his name we must assume you all cannot stand clients and you all think John's victims deserved what they got. Talk about shooting yourself in the foot.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-89786317029631645212009-04-22T10:14:00.000+01:002009-04-22T10:14:00.000+01:00SOLICITOR THANK YOU FOR THIS STATEMENT. IT SPEAKS ...SOLICITOR THANK YOU FOR THIS STATEMENT. IT SPEAKS VOLUMES WHY YOU CANNOT BE ALLOWED TO REGULATE YOUR OWN PROFESSION.<br /><br />Peter. As a solicitor let me just say I absolutely cant stand clients at all and from what I see of John's case they got what they deserved.<br /><br />-----------------------------------<br /><br />But you will take Legal Aid money, and do nothing to help your client, perhaps you will be next at the SSDT? <br />Mr Cherbi posted your comment as it is full of supurating venom against clients and chronic bias in favour of John O'Donnell. Talk about letting your mask down, your detestation of clients overides your common sense (if you have any)? What chance would any client have of winning their case with you representing them? Your statement means we must assume that all solicitors have the same view of clients as you have, because we do not know your identity.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-49095197197110150922009-04-22T07:28:00.000+01:002009-04-22T07:28:00.000+01:00Just as well you are not on this slcc Peter.The wh...Just as well you are not on this slcc Peter.The whole thing has turned into a fiasco from what I've heard privately.<br /><br />Good work.The thing was ill conceived from the very start as the former Ombudsman Linda Costelloe Baker said herself.She appears to have been spot on as you might say.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-48758722809725569702009-04-22T01:24:00.000+01:002009-04-22T01:24:00.000+01:00I think anyone who argues they have a right to reg...I think anyone who argues they have a right to regulate themselves are crooks - just look at what happened with the banks who basically did what they wanted and regulated themselves or twisted the regulators round so they weren't doing their job.From what I read of the whole thing most of those at the fsa used to work in banks and look where it got us.Now we have the same with the legal profession and big surprise - they are moaning about it now people want it changed !<br /><br />Self regulation = corruption in anyone's book except crooksAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-31284981124618653782009-04-21T23:50:00.000+01:002009-04-21T23:50:00.000+01:00Peter. As a solicitor let me just say I absolutely...Peter. As a solicitor let me just say I absolutely cant stand clients at all and from what I see of John's case they got what they deserved.<br /><br />Readers, please read between the lines regarding what this solicitor is saying, he cannot stand clients, they got what they deserved. He clearly loves John O'Donnell, this love between solicitors is the reason you and I cannot get justice against the legal profession. Professional love eliminates the possibility of a fair and just legal system. How can this person possibly look at a complaint from a client and judge what is happening on the written evidence. Your documents would go on the fire.<br />Solicitor you said you cannot stand clients, you are a fool for saying this. How can you represent a person fairly if you cannot stand them. You are a coward because you do not want us to know your name. You demonstrate a person does not have to have a great intellect, to be a lawyer.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-15069584110885833092009-04-21T23:28:00.000+01:002009-04-21T23:28:00.000+01:00Surprised you published my comment
Boohoo to thos...Surprised you published my comment<br /><br />Boohoo to those who complain.Tough.<br /><br />At any rate your response demonstrates why only solicitors can be on the SLCC.What mistakes we make if we make them must be dealt with by the profession itself rather than outsiders,the majority of whom (perhaps not including yourself) who have no understanding of what actually goes on in a solicitor's office.<br /><br />NO WAY WILL YOU KEEP REGULATING YOURSELVES, WE ARE NOT TALKING ABOUT GENUINE MISTAKES, WE ARE TALKING ABOUT GENUINE CORRUPTION. LAWYERS INVESTIGATING COMPLAINTS AGAINST LAWYERS = CORRUPTION, IT YOU DON'T LIKE THIS, TOUGH.<br />I HAVE NEVER SEEN A LAWYER TAKING LEGAL ACTION AGAINST ANOTHER LAWYER FOR A MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC. YOUR JUSTICE IS COVERING UP, AND AS LONG AS THE STATUS QUO REMAINS CLIENTS WILL HAVE NO JUSTICE. WHAT HAPPENS IN A LAWYERS OFFICE IN MANY CASES IS CRIMINAL ACTIVITY, WITH A CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS SYSTEM WHICH COVERS EVERYTHING UP.<br /><br />7:59 PMAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-53667269737942133872009-04-21T23:09:00.000+01:002009-04-21T23:09:00.000+01:00I noticed that Douglas Mill - made ridiculous suic...I noticed that Douglas Mill - made ridiculous suicide jibe in the Scotsman after Herald reported the Justice 2 confrontation between Swinney & Mill over interference in claims & access to justice. <br />Mr Mill I cannot speak for the Law Society but as far as Mr Cherbi's supporters are concerned, I can assure you, you won't be missed. If you were an honest man you would still have your old job.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-12961200529149673622009-04-21T22:37:00.000+01:002009-04-21T22:37:00.000+01:00I agree Peter - the whole complaints system agains...I agree Peter - the whole complaints system against lawyers should be criminalised and just as you say when a lawyer is charged they should be stopped from working straight away.Brilliant idea from you which comes as no surprise reading your stuff but to stop the cops and Crown Office whitewashing the case too there would have to be an extra layer of scrutiny to keep them straight too wouldn't you agree ?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-7067629768649870822009-04-21T21:03:00.000+01:002009-04-21T21:03:00.000+01:00Mr Yelland has been at Client Relations for so lon...Mr Yelland has been at Client Relations for so long because he's good at his job which is seeing to it that complaints against his bent colleagues hit the waste basket.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-84669636464068702332009-04-21T20:34:00.000+01:002009-04-21T20:34:00.000+01:00Scottish Solicitors Discipline Tribunal, with the ...Scottish Solicitors Discipline Tribunal, with the punishment John O'Donnell got it should be renamed the Scottish Solicitors Tribunal.<br />Discipline seems to out of the scope of their remit.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-5357036310219391802009-04-21T19:59:00.000+01:002009-04-21T19:59:00.000+01:00Surprised you published my comment
Boohoo to thos...Surprised you published my comment<br /><br />Boohoo to those who complain.Tough.<br /><br />At any rate your response demonstrates why only solicitors can be on the SLCC.What mistakes we make if we make them must be dealt with by the profession itself rather than outsiders,the majority of whom (perhaps not including yourself) who have no understanding of what actually goes on in a solicitor's office.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com