tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post2664883688200980634..comments2024-03-24T23:01:57.640+00:00Comments on The Justice Diaries: Insults fly at Scottish Legal Complaints Commission as Law chiefs launch bitter tirades against campaign groups & law reformersUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger30125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-79283188641938933352009-04-01T10:58:00.000+01:002009-04-01T10:58:00.000+01:00I noted that theScotish Legal Complaints Commissio...I noted that the<BR/>Scotish Legal Complaints Commission Chief Executive Eileen Masterman agreed campaigners<BR/>were "offensive". <BR/>Good morning Eileen. They are not offensive, they are telling the truth. The question is why are the offended lawyers not "Smokin em out" as the ex American president would say. I will tell you why. It is because they are not just offended lawyers, they are guilty offended lawyers. <BR/>The Scottish Legal Complaints Commission and the Law Society are like a building riddled with dry rot. Everything needs torn out and replaced to make sure no rot remains. Eileen people like you should not be offended, you should be taking legal action to prove the pressure groups are dishonest.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-37051687829810835912009-03-30T22:34:00.000+01:002009-03-30T22:34:00.000+01:00Just a quick comment about the medical profession ...Just a quick comment about the medical profession and the NHS. The Healthcare Commission for England and Wales has stated that, patient complaints are not taken seriously by the NHS. <BR/>I can prove in a court of law (if I could get there) that NHS Primary Care leave dishonest doctors working with patients. I believe patients have a right to know if their doctor has been distorting medical records. Harold Shipman was murdering old ladies and distorting their medical records in the afternoon of the murder. The Police investigations confirmed this.<BR/>Shipman as I understand it also had a drug problem. If patients had been told about this, they may not have wanted him as their GP, and perhaps some victims would have been saved.<BR/>The complaints handling systems for doctors and lawyers needs overhauling. NHS managers who protect corrupt doctors should be prosecuted with them. The crooks at the Law Society should be prosecuted with the lawyers they protect. If clients and patients are to obtain justice against these crooks, jail sentences will be necessary. That is the only option to clean up these professions.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-66621930394573327922009-03-30T14:52:00.000+01:002009-03-30T14:52:00.000+01:00YOU ARE BEING INJURED AT WORK. YOUR INJURIES ARE N...YOU ARE BEING INJURED AT WORK. YOUR INJURIES ARE NOT VISIBLE. YOU WANT TO SUE YOUR EMPLOYER. I HAVE TRIED IT, HERE IS HOW IT WORKS.<BR/><BR/>You will need medical evidence. Your employer your GP, all consultants you see for medical reports, and all lawyers in your case will all be insured by the SAME COMPANY. If your case gets to court (I doubt it) the Sheriff will be a paid up member of the Law Society of Scotland. The Law Society is a criminal organisation who looks after lawyers.<BR/>The consultants cannot be sued when they give a medical report about you. Even if they lie they still cannot be sued. <BR/>When people are injured in this type of litigation here is what they are up against.<BR/>If the doctors say your have been injured, their own insurers will have to pay you damages. So they are laying the boot into their own insurance companies.<BR/>If your GP lies in your medical records, NHS Primary Complaints Handling will protect him or her never you. These people taught me the true meaning of unaccountable criminals. <BR/>REMEMBER THIS, DOCTORS AND LAWYERS GET PAID MORE FOR PROTECTING THEIR INSURERS, SO YOUR LITIGATION CASE IS LOST AS SOON AS YOU SIGN THE LEGAL AID FORM.<BR/>My medical records showed that I had been seeing a consultant psychiatrist for twenty years (A LIE) and when I was referred to the incapacity benefits doctor the form asked if I had any mental illness. My GP put a line through that box, because he knew I was not mentally ill. He was trying to stop my incapacity benefit and was telling Hamilton Sheriff Court I was mentally ill at the same time. <BR/>WHAT DID THE NHS DO TO HIM, NOTHING. He was accused of corruption in public and did not take any legal action. <BR/>Do you know why litigation solicitors and doctors are filth? It is because they allow you to start litigation proceedings (they are making money) and if you have been injured they will cover it up for their insurers.<BR/>If after reading this you still want to sue your employer YOUR GP WILL FIGHT AGAINST YOU AS IF HE WERE PAYING YOUR DAMAGES OUT OF HIS OWN BANK ACCOUNT. When my GP was caught he asked me if I would put it behind me to save his neck? You work out who has the mental health problems. <BR/>Have you ever heard the saying "Trust me I am a doctor".Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-65288053505696640752009-03-30T11:35:00.000+01:002009-03-30T11:35:00.000+01:00Anyone who thinks Scotland Against Crooked Lawyers...Anyone who thinks Scotland Against Crooked Lawyers are offensive, must work in the legal profession.<BR/>No matter where I go, I tell people to check out the www.SACL.info and write it down for them. I also tell them about Peter Cherbi's site. You can reach a lot of people by word of mouth. I urge all readers (except lawyers) how sarcastic am I, to tell everyone they know about crooked lawyers.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-76437985056768598532009-03-29T21:56:00.000+01:002009-03-29T21:56:00.000+01:00As an individual who found it impossible to get co...As an individual who found it impossible to get compensation from the Law Society, please please please never trust any lawyer. <BR/>This profession rip your heart out and spit in your eye. In litigation your family GP of thirty years will fight against you so hard, you would think he or she was paying your damages. <BR/>When individual professionals are so powerful no lawyer will help you, you will stand alone aganst these ruthless criminals. <BR/>If Harold Shipman had used a firearm the gun laws would have changed overnight. Please note I mean no disrespect against victims of gun crime, or Shipmans victims. He used a syringe therefore he was harder to detect. Has the law changed to protect patients from another deadly doctor since the Shipman enquiry? I rest my case.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-63301559115737131712009-03-29T12:09:00.000+01:002009-03-29T12:09:00.000+01:00Good Morning Mr CherbiThank you for your warning r...Good Morning Mr Cherbi<BR/><BR/>Thank you for your warning regarding clients leaving money with law firms. If clients have not been able to get compensation out of the Law Society fund in the past then the money in the pot now is probably going to stay there.<BR/>Your warning about a lawyer using a clients house purchase money for his firms liquidity does not shock me. Look what this pressure group say about those at the top of the legal profession.<BR/>Scotland Against Crooked Lawyers have named the following professionals as crooks.<BR/><BR/>Former Sheriff Hugh Neilson.<BR/> <BR/>Lord Gill-Lord Justice Clerk.<BR/><BR/>Lord Cullen-Former Lord President. <BR/><BR/>Gordon Jackson QC.<BR/><BR/>Lord Hamilton-Scotlands Lord President. <BR/><BR/>Readers please check www.SACL.info/rogues.htm for more information.<BR/><BR/>Regarding the above five individuals Scotland Against Crooked Lawyers stated<BR/>"We chose them because of their positions at the top of the Scottish arbour mafiosa. The judges named and shamed are big time crooks whose main function is to conceal criminal activity by their fellow lawyers and their associates. They should have all been jailed years ago".<BR/>If the people at the top are crooks what does that say to the general public about the rest of the legal profession. Take Mr Cherbie's advice DO NOT LEAVE YOUR MONEY WITH LAW FIRMS OR YOU STAND A GOOD CHANCE OF LOSING IT.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-63580451859470258302009-03-25T22:03:00.000+00:002009-03-25T22:03:00.000+00:00We want to thank Mr Cherbi and Scotland Against Cr...We want to thank Mr Cherbi and Scotland Against Crooked Lawyers for their internet sites and campaign. <BR/>It is an indictment of the current system that you have to go to these lengths to change things.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-60334893631183243102009-03-21T23:20:00.000+00:002009-03-21T23:20:00.000+00:00Having dealt with dishonest lawyers myself it is f...Having dealt with dishonest lawyers myself it is frightening how much power is bestowed on people who read a particular subject at university. <BR/>Peter you and Scotland Against Crooked Lawyers are NOT OFFENSIVE. You deserve the full support of the public. <BR/>If people are unfortunate enough to have similar problems with dishonest doctors, you will find that they are also protected to the same extent as lawyers. In my view two of the most self protecting, corrupt professions on the planet. <BR/>Please keep up your excellent work Peter. The Law Society, and the Scottish Legal Complaints Commission, hate you because you tell the public how it is. The Scottish people need more Peter Cherbi's and more pressure groups like Scotland Against Crooked Lawyers. The current system provides no legal remedy for victims of crooked lawyers. Why should any lawyer be honest if the penalties for corruption are a cover up. The fact that lawyers do not want independent complaints handling, dictates that they have much to hide.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-42236526220378096662009-03-19T23:39:00.000+00:002009-03-19T23:39:00.000+00:00Peter Cherbi and Scotland Against Crooked Lawyers ...Peter Cherbi and Scotland Against Crooked Lawyers must be supported at all costs.<BR/>The legal profession have too much power for the good of their clients and the general public. Lawyers and the Law Society only have themselves to blame. They are the driving force for pressure groups and individuals like Peter. Give the Scottish people justice by obliterating self regulation.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-33976328727524231792009-03-18T08:13:00.000+00:002009-03-18T08:13:00.000+00:00Looks like those who start the insults are the one...Looks like those who start the insults are the ones with the most to hide.<BR/>Do they have booze ups at the SLCC on our money ?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-61735807748010235652009-03-13T20:32:00.000+00:002009-03-13T20:32:00.000+00:00I dont think anyone at this slcc has a right to ha...I dont think anyone at this slcc has a right to have a go at anyone after what I've read on this blog!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-91213965135654874242009-03-13T16:01:00.000+00:002009-03-13T16:01:00.000+00:00Having a go at the crooked lawyers mob is one thin...Having a go at the crooked lawyers mob is one thing but the comments against the Scottish Consumer Council are way out of line.<BR/><BR/>The SCC has done a lot more for consumers than this bunch of numpties at the slcc will ever do !Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-55992473717228701022009-03-13T15:09:00.000+00:002009-03-13T15:09:00.000+00:00Great public service work Peter.Just what do these...Great public service work Peter.<BR/><BR/>Just what do these people mean as 'Offensive'? I think that they should be asked to explain just exactly what they mean,...Is this libellous?<BR/><BR/>Is it 'Offensive' in our society to warn the public about those who do damage to our society?<BR/><BR/>Is it 'Offensive' for mere plebians to have the timerity to think they can report crooked lawyers and perverse systems which are against the public interest?<BR/><BR/>Is it 'Offensive' to tell the truth about what is going on?<BR/><BR/>Or Is it 'Offensive' to these people that they are now being exposed as crooks when some have become too used to considering themselves as being above the law!<BR/><BR/>Maybe the Public should speak out against these people who have a starting position of being anti-public (SACL), as being 'Offensive' to the Public and to stop using them until such times as they properly represent the Public instead of maintaining the status quo which has been proven as corrupt.<BR/><BR/>Judy CAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-27709449331965975252009-03-13T14:50:00.000+00:002009-03-13T14:50:00.000+00:00I agree MacAskill is responsible for all this luna...I agree MacAskill is responsible for all this lunacy but it will take someone else to clean it up because he will NOT.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-53316377942009734562009-03-13T13:25:00.000+00:002009-03-13T13:25:00.000+00:00exactly which bit of the sacl website does scanlan...exactly which bit of the sacl website does scanlan find offensive ?<BR/><BR/>any of her friends happen to be crooked lawyers up on the page ?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-22277841502417997022009-03-13T13:04:00.000+00:002009-03-13T13:04:00.000+00:00If they are too busy stacking the deck against cri...If they are too busy stacking the deck against critics maybe they should go find another job to do because they are obviously not there to help the public from what I can see of those emails.<BR/><BR/>Good workAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-23890810857656869672009-03-13T11:01:00.000+00:002009-03-13T11:01:00.000+00:00These people were chosen by MacAskill (a lawyer) t...These people were chosen by MacAskill (a lawyer) to make sure no one else except lawyers could handle complaints against themselves and this is the result.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-89391150582839470932009-03-12T22:11:00.000+00:002009-03-12T22:11:00.000+00:00Sounds like you were right all along about this bu...Sounds like you were right all along about this bunch.They will do no good for anyone except themselves and lawyers just like beforeAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-3970686343947535412009-03-12T21:15:00.000+00:002009-03-12T21:15:00.000+00:00dont really care much about sacl(their website is ...dont really care much about sacl(their website is less offensive than some tabloids)but your sources have a point - it it wasnt for crooked lawyers there wouldnt be an sacl !Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-37648041899925023152009-03-12T20:49:00.000+00:002009-03-12T20:49:00.000+00:00I liked the comment about regulators turning as cr...I liked the comment about regulators turning as crooked as those they regulate.Very apt in the current climate.<BR/><BR/>Anyway I'm sure there will be some at this slcc wishing the black ink was used on your foi Peter.<BR/><BR/>Good work anyway and nice to see you catch them out once again.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-21953402630161116732009-03-12T20:12:00.000+00:002009-03-12T20:12:00.000+00:00Good one Peter keep up the good work !Good one Peter keep up the good work !Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-85365994165239220512009-03-12T20:01:00.000+00:002009-03-12T20:01:00.000+00:00# Anonymous @ 4.25pmI assume the respected Profess...# Anonymous @ 4.25pm<BR/><BR/>I assume the respected Professor knows he is supposed to be part of an organisation to help consumers out of the mess the Law Society has created, however I agree with what you say in that the SLCC does look the same as the Law Society now.<BR/><BR/>#Anonymous @ 4.33pm<BR/><BR/>Dogged determination and good sources ...<BR/><BR/># Anonymous @ 4.54pm<BR/><BR/>Thanks for the link. Interesting story, sanitised of all truth too ...<BR/><BR/>Good investigative journalist still exists .. its just you have to look harder for it these days ....<BR/><BR/># Anonymous @ 5.13pm<BR/><BR/>I entirely agree.<BR/><BR/># Anonymous @ 5.58pm<BR/><BR/>I agree with your comments. A source tonight seems to feel it was the Law Society who saw to the appointments of the SLCC's board members, and Mr MacAskill simply waved them through. <BR/><BR/>More to come on that soon ...<BR/><BR/># Anonymous @ 5.59pm<BR/><BR/>Good point. <BR/><BR/># Anonymous @ 6.54pm<BR/><BR/>Thanks, and I agree entirely with your comment.<BR/><BR/># Anonymous @ 7.28pm<BR/><BR/>Yes, the SLCC is certainly demonstrating it needs external oversight of its own operations ...Diary of Injusticehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00697476580161690118noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-37339861064570775132009-03-12T19:28:00.000+00:002009-03-12T19:28:00.000+00:00Only solution here is to sack the whole SLCC and s...Only solution here is to sack the whole SLCC and start again and I agree with you it needs to be watched.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-21036877724779053002009-03-12T18:54:00.000+00:002009-03-12T18:54:00.000+00:00All of which proves my point that regulators end u...All of which proves my point that regulators end up as crooked as those they regulate !<BR/><BR/>Good work Peter !Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-70191536038945453552009-03-12T17:59:00.000+00:002009-03-12T17:59:00.000+00:00disgusting attitudewould Mags also condemn parents...disgusting attitude<BR/><BR/>would Mags also condemn parents against pedophiles?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com