tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post1840587116247069493..comments2024-03-24T23:01:57.640+00:00Comments on The Justice Diaries: One more ex-cop for anti-client Scottish Legal Complaints Commission as Justice Secretary hands out five year quango jobs at £212 per dayUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger69125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-54758039427202615532011-06-03T20:31:00.611+01:002011-06-03T20:31:00.611+01:00same ex-cop..I wonder how secure the information r...same ex-cop..I wonder how secure the information really is haha..<br /><br />http://www.thesun.co.uk/scotsol/homepage/news/2999421/Drug-deal-police-girl-Laura-Young-jailed-for-two-years.html<br /><br />Drug deal police girl jailed for two years<br /><br />By CHARLOTTE THOMSON<br /><br />Published: 04 Jun 2010<br /><br />A DRUG-dealing police worker who also nicked a stash of secret crime files was caged for more than two years yesterday.<br /><br />Scheming Laura Young, 22, of Aberdeen, was caught selling cocaine to a woman at her home.<br /><br />She was nabbed after being suspended from her job as a police custody and security officer for copying reports from Grampian Police HQ.<br /><br />Aberdeen Sheriff Court was told how she even showed one confidential file to the person it had been written about.<br /><br />And she also obtained a list of names of 40 people arrested in Operation Lochnagar - which aimed to clear drug dealers off the streets.<br /><br />Young - who was sacked - admitted breaking data protection rules on five occasions between March and May last year and selling cocaine in April.<br /><br />Yesterday Sheriff James Tierney jailed her for 28 months and fined her £1,250, saying: "The supply of cocaine is the scourge of many communities."<br /><br />Afterwards, Supt Iain McGrory said: "We are satisfied appropriate measures are in place to ensure information held by us is as secure as possible."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-79748535320529745872011-04-20T07:36:31.762+01:002011-04-20T07:36:31.762+01:00thanks for posting this.thanks for posting this.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-75853201321537442512011-03-29T22:30:10.626+01:002011-03-29T22:30:10.626+01:00MacAskill made a big mess of this SLCC although wi...MacAskill made a big mess of this SLCC although with things the way they are in the legal world and Peter the only one reporting the point of view of us consumers or clients the whole thing could have been set up to fail from the beginning.<br /><br />Good thing you had nothing to do with this bunch of apologists for 'crooked lawyers'.I'm sure someone with your experience knew it was going to be a failure from the start anyway.<br /><br />Keep up the good work PeterAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-76985280594513894812011-03-24T23:01:06.699+00:002011-03-24T23:01:06.699+00:00Interesting comment about putting recordings of SL...Interesting comment about putting recordings of SLCC operatives threatening clients on ytube, as I have a similar problem with sheriff court corruption on the grand scale and complaining to the sheriffdom business manager and offering up all the recordings (seven in all) has only led to an internal cover up. Quiet frankly any more harassment from them and I will give you a disc Mr Cherbi so their identity and crimes can be immortalised on ytube for ever.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-62580268441432755642011-03-24T22:31:35.533+00:002011-03-24T22:31:35.533+00:00Hi Peter.I hear you were being discussed today at ...Hi Peter.I hear you were being discussed today at the SLCC..<br />I dont think they like you too much..Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-23457148797379489552011-03-24T16:46:36.973+00:002011-03-24T16:46:36.973+00:00YOU CANNOT SUE A LAWYER, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE SO DO NO...YOU CANNOT SUE A LAWYER, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE SO DO NOT MAKE THEM YOUR EXECUTOR, THEY ARE ALL EVIL AND THEIR INSURANCE ARRANGEMENTS MEAN YOU WILL NEVER BE ABLE TO GET COMPENSATED. <br /><br />THESE PEOPLE WOULD BAULK IF WE CALLED THEM CRIMINALS BUT THEY ARE.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-89476001983589647992011-03-24T15:58:55.701+00:002011-03-24T15:58:55.701+00:00Thanks for the info in the first comment,I hadnt r...Thanks for the info in the first comment,I hadnt realised Jane Irvine was Lay Inspector of Constabulary.<br />Given the poor performance of the SLCC I wonder what good any of these people including those currently on the board have actually brought to consumers?<br />Nothing?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-9081233081739077912011-03-24T14:21:54.102+00:002011-03-24T14:21:54.102+00:00Stuffing a complaints quango with ex cops and lawy...Stuffing a complaints quango with ex cops and lawyers doesnt do much for its claim of 'independence' and remember clients are ultimately paying for this lot.Disgusting.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-87842597502922387092011-03-24T13:36:45.521+00:002011-03-24T13:36:45.521+00:00An Earlier Article of Peters.
A legal insider to...An Earlier Article of Peters.<br /><br /><br />A legal insider today advised people making a will to make sure they left some form of second copy with a trusted source other than their lawyer, (SPEAKS VOLUMES ABOUT THE INTEGRITY OF LAWYERS) as it is now becoming increasingly popular due to the recession and ever decreasing profits of law firms for Scottish solicitors to abuse the contents of a deceased client’s will (GRAVEROBBERS) and pocket the money themselves, with the tactics used by Karus, telling one beneficiary it had went to charity, and informing the charity a new will had been discovered, becoming commonplace.<br /><br />THE SLCC DO NOT DO ANYTHING ABOUT LAWYER CROOKS. THE LAW SOCIETY PROTECT THEM. DANGER CLIENTS, DON'T LET THESE GRAVEROBBERS TAKE YOUR LIFE'S SAVINGS AND PROPERTY BECAUSE IF MR MACASKILL THOUGHT THIS CONDUCT WAS UNACCEPTABLE HE AS JUSTICE MINISTER WOULD DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT. LEAVING YOUR LAWYER AS EXECUTOR OF YOUR ESTATE IS LIKE LEAVING A FOX IN YOUR HENHOUSE.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-1606276647946772282011-03-24T13:27:37.638+00:002011-03-24T13:27:37.638+00:00We all know what happens to clients when self regu...We all know what happens to clients when self regulators receive complaints. <br /><br />The greater the power of any profession the greater the need for independent policing of the profession so as not to create tyranny. <br /><br />The latter reflects the current situation. As I always tell people Ms Irvine, TRUST NO LAWYER. Then I give them a list of internet sites and tell them Peter's blog, SACL, solicitorsfromhell.co.uk. Have a read I say, and think twice DO YOU NEED A LAWYER? Only criminals self regulate, and those that protect them are worse.<br /><br />Au revoir ma cherie.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-40067746846540163312011-03-24T12:41:27.490+00:002011-03-24T12:41:27.490+00:00Very good Peter I'm glad to see the move to bu...Very good Peter I'm glad to see the move to buy you off with an SLCC post didn't achieve its unstated aim.<br />Keep giving my former colleagues as many headaches as you can manage.<br /><br />PS.Hi Jane.If you are reading!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-30879980559689432862011-03-24T12:18:31.078+00:002011-03-24T12:18:31.078+00:00# Anonymous @ 23 March 2011 13:41
I'd say &qu...# Anonymous @ 23 March 2011 13:41<br /><br />I'd say "Do it" and provide other media outlets with a copy at the same time ...<br /><br />Clearly whatever the content of the recording is, it is certainly in the public interest it be disclosed ...<br /><br />If this is the Montgomery/SLAB recording I am looking forward to hearing itAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-14049422254360482092011-03-24T12:08:40.737+00:002011-03-24T12:08:40.737+00:00Peter they read your blog because it reflects the ...Peter they read your blog because it reflects the reality of the situation, your blog exposes lawyers and also those like MacAskill, a lawyer politician who believes we owe his chums a great debt. MacAskill is a bum justice minister, selective in who he thinks should be prosecuted. <br /><br />He is on television at times but he never mentions a Diary of Injustice because it reflects the truth, not the coverups behind his and his predecessor who wanted to use the legal system to silence SACL. The SLCC Law Society protect lawyers behind a veil of corruption.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-83882562585696493462011-03-24T11:57:24.872+00:002011-03-24T11:57:24.872+00:00# Anonymous @ 23 March 2011 21:37
The SLCC and ap...# Anonymous @ 23 March 2011 21:37<br /><br />The SLCC and apparently Jane Irvine actually do read the comments section, apparently with some vigour ... to the point they pay a company to monitor this blog. I will feature more details on this in a future article ...<br /><br />Yes Peter it is in their interests to read your blog and lets face it they would want self regulation ended if they were in our shoes. They do not care if it does not affect them. <br /><br />Lawyers are bad news and so are those who protect them.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-84719176574919848262011-03-24T11:16:44.288+00:002011-03-24T11:16:44.288+00:00Nice of you to say Peter although I think you are ...Nice of you to say Peter although I think you are in a bit of a unique position to write the way you do and expose these legal thugs for what they are - trash<br /><br />Keep up the good work!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-79354123172925493502011-03-23T23:58:28.345+00:002011-03-23T23:58:28.345+00:00# Anonymous @ 23 March 2011 22:03
Thanks ...
Of ...# Anonymous @ 23 March 2011 22:03<br /><br />Thanks ...<br /><br />Of course, the blog like a part of any campaign is a collective effort on the part of myself and all of you who comment, those of you who suggest ideas, cases to investigate or ask for advice.<br /><br />With regards to a comment received this evening at 8:18pm which cannot be published, I will look into the case if you forward some details to me via scottishlawreporters@gmail.com<br /><br /># Anonymous @ 23 March 2011 21:37<br /><br />The SLCC and apparently Jane Irvine actually do read the comments section, apparently with some vigour ... to the point they pay a company to monitor this blog. I will feature more details on this in a future article ...Diary of Injusticehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00697476580161690118noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-42256426079468239392011-03-23T22:03:14.846+00:002011-03-23T22:03:14.846+00:00Fantastic blog you have here Peter.Great to see so...Fantastic blog you have here Peter.Great to see someone ripping into the legal thuggery which goes on all around us.Taking apart this ridiculous image of lawyers being picture perfect is one of the best ways to educate the uninformed those who use justice to prey on people are the worst of the worst.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-79311110005784074192011-03-23T21:37:32.336+00:002011-03-23T21:37:32.336+00:00Yes I'm sure the quango positions will start f...Yes I'm sure the quango positions will start flowing in for these new additions to the gang.In fact I bet the SLCC already have them reading Peter's report on their appointments.Hello SLCC I hope you are reading my comments and all the others here.Do you want to tell us why you are letting all the crooked lawyers off the hook ??Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-64433146268208404772011-03-23T20:36:23.443+00:002011-03-23T20:36:23.443+00:00The three new ‘lay members’ who are supposed to ‘b...The three new ‘lay members’ who are supposed to ‘balance’ up the Law Society tilted Scottish Legal Complaints Commission will be happily receiving a very wallet friendly £212 per day for the next five years, for a remarkably little time commitment of up to six days per month, along with the usual expenses claims, which currently average out to a massive £10,000 approx per SLCC board member and the many other perks associated with being on what one msp called “A front company for the Law Society of Scotland.”<br /><br />THIS IS THE PRICE OF PROTECTING CORRUPTION IN SCOTLAND UNDER THE SNPAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-60341359774024257302011-03-23T19:55:35.028+00:002011-03-23T19:55:35.028+00:00A funny thing happened on the way to the office - ...A funny thing happened on the way to the office - a colleague who read your blog all last night agreed the Law Society and the SLCC should be axed because both are self serving organisations who care nothing about consumers or the best interests of the legal profession.<br />Think about it Peter.Self interest and self preservation is more of a priority for the LSoS and the SLCC than the interests of those they claim to represent.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-81684922838885098732011-03-23T18:31:03.080+00:002011-03-23T18:31:03.080+00:00Good Evening Mr MacAskill,
You are good at regula...Good Evening Mr MacAskill,<br /><br />You are good at regulation, I see you on the TV News acting as a front of a justice minister, but your kind of justice is what the SLCC have done since it's birth. <br /><br />You are doing what I expect, keeping your lawyer colleagues safe and I hope you get a pasting in May.<br /><br />The Law Society or the University of Glasgow will provide a post for you.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-78418588982425878832011-03-23T18:14:47.551+00:002011-03-23T18:14:47.551+00:00http://www.intmensorg.info/doctors.htm
Two doctor...http://www.intmensorg.info/doctors.htm<br /><br />Two doctors who left a trail of damaged and abused women during careers that lasted decades were allowed to continue practising because of a culture of complacency, separate inquiries reported yesterday. The scandals of the disgraced gynaecologist Richard Neale, who botched operations on women over more than a decade, and the GP Clifford Ayling, who was jailed for sexually abusing his patients over 30 years, have gone down in the annals of medical dishonour as among the worst in memory.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-5529165817756216532011-03-23T18:12:24.063+00:002011-03-23T18:12:24.063+00:00http://www.intmensorg.info/doctors.htm
A family d...http://www.intmensorg.info/doctors.htm<br /><br />A family doctor described as a 'deviant' for downloading child-sex stories has escaped being struck off.<br /><br />Dr Nicholas Spicer, 55, read the paedophile fantasies on his home computer between 2003 and 2007 while working with children as a GP. He was hauled before a General Medical Council disciplinary hearing, where he was described as 'a sexual deviant with an interest in children'. But he was cleared of misconduct and banned from practising for just six months 'on grounds of health'.<br /><br />He was removed from NHS Herefordshire's list of GPs but is free to return to work in another area of the country from as early as July. Spicer, who worked at the Nunwell surgery in Bromyard, Herefordshire, has also evaded criminal charges because the stories are legally available on the internet. Child safety groups and even Spicer's wife yesterday condemned the GMC's decision not to strike him off the medical register. Spicer's disgusted wife Patricia has started divorce proceedings.<br /><br />She said: 'People and professionals that I have spoken to are mystified about the decision. 'The GMC's mission statement is "protecting doctors, protecting people", but they are not living up to it.' Spicer is unrepentant and claims his behaviour was down to a medical condition.<br /><br />He said: 'I have never been accused of being a paedophile, but it is obvious that people might wonder. 'I was examined by seven experts in the field of child-sex offences and six out of seven concluded that I'm not a paedophile. 'They concluded that I was suffering from a mild, well-capsulated medical condition, exacerbated by domestic problems.'<br /><br />Michael May, spokesman for sexual abuse charity Survivors UK, said: 'I'm appalled by the actions of the GP and the response of the GMC. 'I find it extremely concerning that an educated professional, with intimate access to the most vulnerable members of our community, has been able to exploit a shameful loophole in the law.' At the hearing, Jason Macadam, solicitor for the GMC, branded Spicer 'a sexual deviant' and said the material was 'abhorrent and repugnant'.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-90268015198312004852011-03-23T18:05:21.961+00:002011-03-23T18:05:21.961+00:00Any profession who treats clients like dirt and ex...Any profession who treats clients like dirt and expects those victims to be passive need their heads examined. <br /><br />The Law Society is a union dedicated to ruining clients, and lawyers reputations are suffering for it. We clients are tenacious, defeat if not on the agenda, we will destroy the reputation of all lawyers, by warning others of the evil who enjoy ruining clients and heap insults on us for fighting back.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-89213879198632505712011-03-23T17:55:34.525+00:002011-03-23T17:55:34.525+00:00The word regulation and the phrase legal professio...The word regulation and the phrase legal profession are mutually exclusive. <br /><br />The Scottish Solicitors Discipline Tribunal stating not one lawyer prosecuted since the SLCC's inception proves that the SLCC are passing complaints to the Law Society for burial.<br /><br />It also proves that the SLCC staff love lawyers and hate clients. The only logical conclusion we can draw from this is that lawyers are more dangerous now than they ever were. <br /><br />The educated derelict at the SLCC who referred to Law Society Suicide Victims as "frequent fliers" is a nasty piece of work and representative of this low life profession.<br /><br />Trust no lawyer.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com