tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post116248881375660238..comments2024-03-24T23:01:57.640+00:00Comments on The Justice Diaries: Law Society of Scotland threatens Court challenge against Scottish Executive over LPLA legal reform BillUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger18125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-1163920011876982412006-11-19T07:06:00.000+00:002006-11-19T07:06:00.000+00:00Penny, I think I will do an article on some of the...Penny, I think I will do an article on some of the themes of the posts to my article .. as the debate is now dead from mr anonymous.Diary of Injusticehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00697476580161690118noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-1163865243901130842006-11-18T15:54:00.000+00:002006-11-18T15:54:00.000+00:00Peter, I hope you are going to respond to this per...Peter, I hope you are going to respond to this person.<BR/><BR/>Looking forward to more from you.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-1163766023085752882006-11-17T12:20:00.000+00:002006-11-17T12:20:00.000+00:00Well gentlemen, it does seem that you can miscontr...Well gentlemen, it does seem that you can miscontrue a genuine attempt for debate as a sign that I am a lawyer.<BR/><BR/>As for my support or otherwise of any of the issues we have 'discussed' I can't see that I have stated any other policy other than I don't think it is a good idea to take regulation from lawyers and give it to the Executive.<BR/><BR/>Thanks for offering to provide me with an answer to the question I posed. May I suggest that if you wish to gather support in future that you refrain from pointless point scoring and get to the point.<BR/><BR/>Thanks for your timeAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-1163634861029390002006-11-15T23:54:00.000+00:002006-11-15T23:54:00.000+00:00Archie .. thanks for your support. Seems I have to...Archie .. thanks for your support. Seems I have touched a nerve with this article - a Scotsman journalist called me this afternoon to tell me that Mill is furious over the way the article was handled - even made some verbal hate comments against poor old me .. he does seem to drop his guard sometimes or let his BP get the better of him.<BR/><BR/>Anyway, that's a great point - What would a victim say to their abuser .. but the legal profession expect to be able to abuse people then the victims have to go back for more. After all, they've been doing it for ages, so why let a little thing like the LPLA Bill come along and stop it now ?<BR/><BR/>Mr anonymous is obviously a supporter of such Law Society policy - because his attitude against anyone who dissents from the present system of self regulation of the legal profession is probably one of attack .. just as the Law Society of Scotland constanty attack their victims & critics .. he's only reflecting that policy.<BR/><BR/>First Minister - no way, Archie ! .. Scotland needs a proper government, not a Westminster STOOGE assembly where they are all bought off with vast expenses accounts (bribes & backhanders). Anyway, there are others much more qualified than me to do it .. and as an old friend always said .. be careful of being the emperor .. because it usually turns out you have to get rid of them at some stage !Diary of Injusticehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00697476580161690118noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-1163616828539118862006-11-15T18:53:00.000+00:002006-11-15T18:53:00.000+00:00Hey Pete forgot to askWhy dont you want to be Firs...Hey Pete forgot to ask<BR/><BR/>Why dont you want to be First Minister ? LOL !!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-1163615001477993462006-11-15T18:23:00.000+00:002006-11-15T18:23:00.000+00:00Yeah Pete I see what you mean by this guy.Hey anon...Yeah Pete I see what you mean by this guy.<BR/><BR/>Hey anonymous (lawyer ?)have you ever asked a victim of a horrible crime how they felt about the person who did it to them ? Most people fucked over by someone would like to hang the bastard from the nearest rooftop but you lawyers get away with it because you cover up for each other.<BR/><BR/>Looks like you touched a raw nerve with this article Pete - keep it up mate !Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-1163608654771662802006-11-15T16:37:00.000+00:002006-11-15T16:37:00.000+00:00Anonymous .. it seems you are afraid to even put y...Anonymous .. it seems you are afraid to even put your name to your words. let alone your contact details. Why is that exactly ? You are obviously a supporter of self regulation of the legal profession.<BR/><BR/>You make comments of my reaction to debate being vitriolic or even manic ?<BR/><BR/>The Law Society of Scotland's reaction to my complaint against Mr Penman & his colleagues was to turn their entire resources against me, completely interdict my life & intimidate my every move, even to the point of threatening my life, and intimidating other members of my family. Just how manic can you get ? or do you also condone such behaviour as the Leslie Cumming attack ?<BR/><BR/>I will never be appointed FIrst Minister, thankfully, I'm not into dead end jobs, or dishing out favours to people who would elect me to such a post, but as far as co-regulation goes, there would be none if I were in charge.<BR/><BR/>Solicitors would be bound by the terms of a completely independent complaints investigation body - which would have only solicitor advisory complement & no more influence than that. If they didn't like the way the legal industry would be regulated in that way, then they can go be a plumber or something else.<BR/><BR/> The same would apply to the accountancy profession, whom I note are equally as entrenched in self regulation as the legal profession - and assist one & other when it suits to go up against a common enemy.Diary of Injusticehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00697476580161690118noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-1163590721001786632006-11-15T11:38:00.000+00:002006-11-15T11:38:00.000+00:00Your reaction to debate on this topic is startling...Your reaction to debate on this topic is startling. Such vitriol is bordering on manic.<BR/><BR/>I would be happy to leave my contact details with you but not in a public forum. <BR/><BR/>My question to you is 'If you were elected first minister (perish the thought), what measures would you impliment to replace the current system of co-regulation of solicitors in Scotland?'. By co-regulation, I mean the European, UK and Scottish Parliaments, the FSA etc.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-1163465811486998882006-11-14T00:56:00.000+00:002006-11-14T00:56:00.000+00:00solution to what ? solution to a corrupt Scottish ...solution to what ? solution to a corrupt Scottish legal profession - that even covers up cases of it's own members involved in child abuse ? well - taking away regulation from the legal profession is a start, don't you think ?<BR/><BR/>As for Ministers who may exert way too much influence - well, at the end of the day - they are elected politicians, and elected politicians ultimate regulator has to be the electorate, right ? <BR/><BR/>Complain against a lawyer or expose their fiddles - they usually stay in practice and go on to rob as many other clients as they can because nothing is done... Expose corrupt politicians or rent milkers .. and after the press get onto it .. politician has to go .. not with lawyers though - because they go & threaten the newspapers & careers of journalists who write anti-legal profession stories in the papers - plenty examples of those around.<BR/><BR/>Why not leave your name & phone number, anonymous or is that a wee bit too much for you ? .. clearly you are an opponent of reforms to the legal profession .. and we all know the motives of opponents .. nothing to do with honesty & transparency now, is it.Diary of Injusticehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00697476580161690118noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-1163438736782956902006-11-13T17:25:00.000+00:002006-11-13T17:25:00.000+00:00You again go on to prove my point admirably - wher...You again go on to prove my point admirably - where is your solution?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-1163094895575946482006-11-09T17:54:00.000+00:002006-11-09T17:54:00.000+00:00Dear Anonymous .. again probably sounds like a mem...Dear Anonymous .. again probably sounds like a member of the legal profession.<BR/><BR/>Well, giving the courts the final say certainly does put it back in the hands of the lawyers - after all, everyone from the lawyers to the judge are still members of the Law Society of Scotland.<BR/><BR/>I wonder if Mill will be threatening those in house lawyers of the Executive & Parliament too ? Not the first time it's happened ... so who might the Executive be able to rely on for competent & honest defence of the LPLA Bill ?<BR/><BR/>Credibility isn't an issue with me thanks - nor is it with the many other victims of the legal profession - who have lost their own credibility through their own corrupt behaviour.<BR/><BR/>You could maybe tell me what level of credibility a senior lawyer linked to the Law Society still has, after recently getting off from fraud charges.Diary of Injusticehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00697476580161690118noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-1163093153383873252006-11-09T17:25:00.000+00:002006-11-09T17:25:00.000+00:00Again I read your blog with emotions tipping betwe...Again I read your blog with emotions tipping between increduality and pity.<BR/><BR/>You fail to miss the point on a possible challenge to the LPLA Bill. The Bill as it stands will allow Ministers to exert way too much influence. Although you then harp on about the lack of accountability of the said Ministers. <BR/><BR/>No doubt you will infer that giving the courts final say will simply put the ball back in the hands of lawyers. Offering a workable solution may allow you to secure the credibility that you so crave.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-1162699598456254552006-11-05T04:06:00.000+00:002006-11-05T04:06:00.000+00:00I think you have those guys at the Scotsman a bit ...I think you have those guys at the Scotsman a bit worried. Looks like you are writing stuff before its written.<BR/><BR/>Keep up the good work, and try gettin some sleep sometime kid. Live to fight another day !Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-1162665424439716532006-11-04T18:37:00.000+00:002006-11-04T18:37:00.000+00:00may you be considered the anti-lawyer ?! don't bla...may you be considered the anti-lawyer ?! don't blame you though - obviously these tossers made a mess of your life - why not have a bit of revenge and let everyone know what bastards they are. good on ya kid.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-1162651402666451952006-11-04T14:43:00.000+00:002006-11-04T14:43:00.000+00:00Dear 'anonymous' (on the radiation death of the te...Dear 'anonymous' (on the radiation death of the teenager story in the Scotsman)<BR/><BR/>I hear what you say. <BR/><BR/>Out of my own experience on reports after a medical negligence death ... they are carefully worded to let everyone off the hook anyway, but the family's lawyer will have to put that one right, if he dares to.<BR/><BR/>My sympathies to the family of Lisa Norris. I can't imagine how sad they are over the loss of their child because of this.<BR/><BR/>I can't become involved in cases like this though, as my name is poison in the legal profession and I can't allow lawyers to transfer their hate for me, onto others. <BR/><BR/>Thats why I help people in the background as best I can, and that's why I write about what happened to me here, so hopefully, others can avoid it.<BR/><BR/>If any of you start campaigns against medical negligence injustices, you certainly have my support.Diary of Injusticehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00697476580161690118noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-1162573116078014632006-11-03T16:58:00.000+00:002006-11-03T16:58:00.000+00:00Scotsman need to get off their arse and cover this...Scotsman need to get off their arse and cover this, or are we to be treated to more PR on behalf of the legal perverts. errm sorry I mean lawyers.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-1162518031301821442006-11-03T01:40:00.000+00:002006-11-03T01:40:00.000+00:00Douglas Mill sounds a real TWAT.You commented on a...Douglas Mill sounds a real TWAT.<BR/><BR/>You commented on a story in the Scotsman last week - the girl who had too much radiation & died. Well, the Scotsman are running this story :><BR/><BR/>Radiation overdose girl 'died of cancer'<BR/><BR/>LISA Norris, the teenager given a massive overdose of radiation by mistake, died of brain cancer, a post-mortem examination has concluded.<BR/><BR/>Lisa's family, of Girvan, Ayrshire, said they were surprised the report made no reference to the excessive radiation as a cause of death.<BR/><BR/>She received a dose of radiation 58 per cent higher than prescribed. The mistake was made by an inexperienced treatment planner at Glasgow's Beatson Oncology Centre, a Scottish Executive report concluded last week.<BR/><BR/>Cameron Fyfe, of Ross Harper Solicitors, who is acting for the family, said he intended to instruct a medical expert to look further into the case.<BR/><BR/>A funeral for Lisa, who died on 18 October, will be held today in Girvan.<BR/><BR/>Looks like you were right. Cover up all the way and I wonder if their lawyer is leading them on like what happened to your mums case in the Evening News.<BR/>Please form a group or something or help campaigns against these cover ups and keep your comments in the Scotsman site too. people take notice I just wish there was more we can do against these horrible people who cover things up to protect their palsAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20722989.post-1162493294969360062006-11-02T18:48:00.000+00:002006-11-02T18:48:00.000+00:00sent in guy fawkes to fix 'emsent in guy fawkes to fix 'emAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com